InArt: The Lord of the Rings - Gandalf 1:6

[hoodonit00]

Correct, davejames is the only person I've seen make it look good. I got it in hand, still hated it and immediately sold it.

I will continue to hate it for the rest of my days.

Ok

 

[Wor-Gar]

View attachment 602986

Thanks for those. Still not feeling as good about it as I did from the proto photos. Maybe its the undersized, really un-weathered hat?

 

[Tolkien Nerd]

That off-centered name is killing me.

Yeah, same with me. Noticed it straightaway. I can just about live with it, as long as they sort that beard out - as in make it longer!

 

[Gipetto0812]

That off-centered name is killing me.

The name itself is actually on center with the overall width of the base, it's the black area that the name is on that's off center with the base.

 

[Bo Shrek]

Here are two close up images of Gandalf, I'm surprised no one posted them yet. Beard needs to be longer but I can see the sculpt looks good. As long as they work on it and the final product is better we should be ok. View attachment 602985View attachment 602986

Ive seen LOTR & HOBBIT a million times. Was his cloak that brown colour? I thought it was grey.

 

[Bo Shrek]

I think the figure looks nice but still has a "doll" quality that I don't like.

 

[Hando]

Was watching the stream and... ooooftt. That gandalf looks rough

 

[user 72759]

Was watching the stream and... ooooftt. That gandalf looks roughView attachment 603031

The elves are going to have a higher bar to live up to this holiday season.

 

[Antarion]

I think the figure looks nice but still has a "doll" quality that I don't like.

I was sure this would happen once we see inhand pics. The prototype shots all had that perfect dramatic lighting that makes it look more real and more interesting than any normal lighting pic could deliver. It will always be just a doll.

InArt marketing art is just good.

 

[noheddardstark]

I was sure this would happen once we see inhand pics. The prototype shots all had that perfect dramatic lighting that makes it look more real and more interesting than any normal lighting pic could deliver. It will always be just a doll.

InArt marketing art is just good.

That, and many folks have convinced themselves InArt/Queen will save them from whatever they don't like about Asmus, Hot Toys, etc. Even though they haven't delivered a single figure yet.

I'd like an upgrade for my Asmus Gandalf, sure. But so far, this doesn't look much better.

 

[Xman1990]

Apart from the eyes I’m quite happy with my asmus version over this.

 

[user 67236]

 

[chrisstbh]

Looks great to me, spot on. If anyone says that's not a massive step up from the Asmus then they're fooling themselves .

 

[dantes2501]

Trust somewhat restored after seeing the video.

 

[user 67236]

Beard has to be quite bigger and with smooth texture.

 

[user 67922]

Still very confused by the use of the word prototype here, is this the one on display in Vegas or not?

 

[Waiden]

Looks stellar as I expected. People love to jump ship so quickly lol

I commented on Justin's videos (Joker prototype review) and asked him why he reviews a prototype and not the final product when it is supposedly done. He said that it was actually a final product review and he made mistake ... So this could be the same case.

 

[Cap'n Cook]

Looks good.

 

[gaiden1992]

This should be the production piece shown in Vegas (the beard is different from the prototype). Honestly, the headsculpt looks insane. Even better than I thought.

 

[Cap'n Cook]

The fact that Justin said about ‘being flown out to review’ seems to suggest these are literally the Vegas pieces to me.