I will be getting this but for the price they should have fabric boots instead of a split boot for articulation.
There’s nothing hinting at them not doing the full Fellowship...
these are selling very well
they just keep doing more and more characters.
I'm sure the usual suspects will be along in no time to tell you how it's somehow not true because InArt is perfect.Except their own words.
It could be deceiving because the collar is also covering up a lot of his neck. Makes it seem like his head is smallerI know this isn’t the most scientific way of evaluating the figure’s proportions but, since he was first shown, he’s had something of a pin-head going on.
View attachment 753225
And yes, the outfit should definitely be tighter around his waist.
There is still much to be ‘optimised.’
Nevermind then. Gimli fans, continue..:Except InArt said Frodo and Sam will be their last.
If they ask good and confirming questions.Will foxification is interviewing Inart on Sunday. We should get answers then. https://www.youtube.com/live/fGjD6ENJQr8?si=4L_qSNyPbSj-QTLZ
When comparing heads, I look from the chin to the top of their dome, so one could wearing a turtleneck and the other a V-neck T and the one with the larger head should still be apparent.It could be deceiving because the collar is also covering up a lot of his neck. Makes it seem like his head is smaller
Haha I like the analysis. I see your point. My experience in photography is limited but couldn't focal lens, angle, etc. have a part to play in this difference?When comparing heads, I look from the chin to the top of their dome, so one could wearing a turtleneck and the other a V-neck T and the one with the larger head should still be apparent.
OK, you've left me with no alternative but to bust out the head measuring eggs of doom!
View attachment 753371
Orlando Bloom, a perfectly proportionate 7 eggs stature vs InArt's 7.6 - 8 eggs depending on the angle.
A part yes. Not a whole eggs worth though, and these angles aren’t particularly severe- especially the first head-on shot of InAt Legolas. If anything, the camera is slightly angled down, which should make his head appear larger- and it’s still way too small.Haha I like the analysis. I see your point. My experience in photography is limited but couldn't focal lens, angle, etc. have a part to play in this difference?
Yeah fair enoughA part yes. Not a whole eggs worth though, and these angles aren’t particularly severe- especially the first head-on shot of InAt Legolas. If anything, the camera is slightly angled down, which should make his head appear larger- and it’s still way too small.
We already know InArt aren’t great at scaling heads with Joker having a massive noggin and Batman having a puny one, along with the other random scaling issue of Superman just being an absolute giant.
This is something they need to really work on.
I like Pinheadolas.Pinhead Legolas. Bah!
Pingolas!
Yeah isn't there a big fuss about the batman figures head being under scaled too? I have him and I honestly cant tell, but same to be said about quality control issues on the slow decline if he does come out to be Pingolas lmfaoI like Pinheadolas.
I’m sorry to point it out but I see a pattern forming and InArt need to start paying closer attention to human proportions.