It's acknowledged and is a major spoiler.How do they acknowledge Shia LaBeouf’s absence - if at all?
It's acknowledged and is a major spoiler.How do they acknowledge Shia LaBeouf’s absence - if at all?
Yes, I liked it for the most part. As indicated earlier I wish they'd have shortened the intro as I didn't think the de-aging held up throughout that sequence. But the story was well conceived and while still fantastical much closer to a Raiders or TLC feel as opposed to KOTCS. Plus it had a couple of emotional beats that surprised me. Earlier I said the last scene didn't quite work for me. I should clarify: I liked where Indy & company ended up it just felt bittersweet, whereas I thought it could/should have felt more uplifting.So you liked it mostly? Or it just wasn't as bad as we've been predicting, is all?
Agreed but I think their acknowledging that even Indy can't beat the ravages of time is the only way this works as a movie. Maybe not quite an Indy movie of yesteryear but a movie. And that said they still had old Indy doing a few too many young Indy stunts, but not so many that it was ridiculous. I did think there were too many chase scenes, but in retrospect old Indy is more believable as a driver or passenger so maybe that played a part lol...Indy adventures don't need 'drama'. I'm sure they worked because we're old men now, but my younger self would just roll his eyes: Come on, more danger and fighting!
I did think there were too many chase scenes
Somehow I sense that the feeling would be mutual.Wretched.
Just wretched.
I'd rather sit through an Admiral Holdo prequel trilogy than suffer five more minutes of Helena.
Just pictured him saying as a adult ‘ This is no time for love’ super awkwardBut if Short Round says "Indy, I love you" at his age now, it takes on a whole other meaning, and a real mess for Indiana Jones. Not the adventure he was looking for.
Slap on the backWow... movie's getting a much better pat-on-the-back than I expected.
Wait a minute -- you're all a bunch of doll collecting freaks. What do you know?
You have one of the best directors for these types of films… you have Harrison and you can tell he actually cares… you have Mads… who always brings it but this is not what he will be remembered for to say the least, but again you can’t go wrong… and you have probably one of the most relevant revolutionary talents in Phoebe Waller-Bridge all in one film. So it’s kind of impossible for it to fail.
A bit dull yes. It’s not magic but it’s damn enjoyable
Or just pay 18 dollars and watch it in a theatre?
To each his own… and I didn’t mean to criticize, I’m one of those advocates that COVID revolutionized the workforce and remote work is here to stay no matter what corporate greed tries to dictate and force with the inane push to office backtracking as of late … so I get it on a lot of levels even if it’s not the same thing,A theatre?
I don't have any inclination to watch any film in one of those. I haven't set foot in one since 1991.
I prefer to avoid people as much as possible, plus the idea of planning to watch something at a specific time in a specific place is completely alien to me.
To each his own… and I didn’t mean to criticize, I’m one of those advocates that COVID revolutionized the workforce and remote work is here to stay no matter what corporate greed tries to dictate and force with the inane push to office backtracking as of late … so I get it on a lot of levels even if it’s not the same thing,
Having said all that I do think it’s important to support film, as much as the studios gobble up most of the profit there are so many talented and hard working production people and performers who are due their fair share.
But again thsts my POV only and I’m not here to judge, only partake in discussion… and I understand why someone would want to avoid public in a general way.
Irregardless of how I think it’s worth the watch, but a big screen and clear picture is best for a film like this I think
One thing we agree on is I’m interested in the hot toy… it’s such a good effort and the film was likable enough to me to make me want an old Indy in my collection
No, I’m not speaking subjectively I’m speaking objectively about Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s near universal acclaim.
I wasn’t a big fan of fleabag, but it seems the critical and mass audience consensus disagrees with me and I can’t argue behind her talent.
Single-handedly she had received best writing, acting and best series awards… britanica outstanding artist of the year… time magazine most influential people…
She is one of the most coveted talents in Hollywood. For example Daniel Craig refused to continue with No Time to Die unless Phoebe was brought in to rewrite most of the script knowing her voice was imperative to bring credibility to that project.
No one can “Mary sue” argue her out of this.
Like it or not, she’s one of the most credible and coveted choices for a film like this.
Her agreeing to be in this film is actually kind of a big deal… She doesn’t need it, she actually brings the role and the film up.
It doesn’t matter if you or whoever else likes it or not, it’s true.
No, I’m not speaking subjectively I’m speaking objectively about Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s near universal acclaim.
I wasn’t a big fan of fleabag, but it seems the critical and mass audience consensus disagrees with me and I can’t argue behind her talent.
Single-handedly she had received best writing, acting and best series awards… britanica outstanding artist of the year… time magazine most influential people…
She is one of the most coveted talents in Hollywood. For example Daniel Craig refused to continue with No Time to Die unless Phoebe was brought in to rewrite most of the script knowing her voice was imperative to bring credibility to that project.
No one can “Mary sue” argue her out of this.
Like it or not, she’s one of the most credible and coveted choices for a film like this.
Her agreeing to be in this film is actually kind of a big deal… She doesn’t need it, she actually brings the role and the film up.
Enter your email address to join: