Dr.Mirakle32
Super Freak
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
- Messages
- 2,862
- Reaction score
- 31
I watched the Indiana Jones movies alot on VHS when I was little, but hadn't really watched a whole one in about five years. So I went out, bought the Widescreen DVD set and gave it another shot last night.
RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK was by far one of the greatest movie experiences of my LIFE! It really doesn't get much better than this. I remembered it being kind of long, but I was surprised at how fast and action-packed the story was. ROTLA clocks in at just under two hours, but the movie went by like it was only 45 minutes.
By the time the Ark-opening climax came around, I couldn't believe how much more shocking and violent it was then I remembered. By the time the credits rolled, I felt like standing up in my bedroom and giving it a standing ovation.
Defintitely one of the greatest adventure films ever made, the greatest 1930's serial ever made (even though it was released in 1981) and probably one of the top 3, or 4 greatest films ever made, period. Sorry, but CASABLANCA don't have **** on RAIDERS.
And as good as the original Star Wars movies are, I'm surprised they have a larger fanbase than the equally entertaining, if not superior INDIANA JONES films.
I really wasn't a Bond fan until 2002 when I saw DAD in theaters. It prompted me in rewatching the rest of the 007 films and I became a huge fan ever since. I can quote most of the Bond films backwards and fowards and as big a fan as they come. But rewatching RAIDERS in such along time really made me realize what a truly great film it is.
Now there is no doubt of the obvious influence Bond has had on the Indiana Jones character and series. The most two often cited and biggest influences on ROTLA were the adventure serials of the 1930's and 40's and of course the 007 films. So in the sense that Flash Gordon was the father of Luke Skywalker; James Bond was the father of Indiana Jones (years before Bond literally became Indy's father in THE LAST CRUSADE.)
Also, both series are essentially blood brothers: Sean Connery was Indy's father, TLD's General Pushkin John Rhy Davies was Indy's goodfriend Sallah, AVTAK Bond girl Alison Doody was Indy's love interest in IJ&TLC, a young Daniel Craig appeared in an episode of the THE YOUNG INDIANA JONES CHRONICLES, and both series have been copying each other's action scenes and content ever since the beginning.
Now, while I love all of the Bond films, and find them all entertaining, it pains me to admit that ROTLA is a much better film than most of them. Sorry, but as much as I love them, IMHO CR and OHMSS don't have **** on ROTLA.
Am I the only one who feels this way? Now I am currently rewatching INDIANA JONES and the TEMPLE OF DOOM and will later revisit INDIANA JONES and the LAST CRUSADE, but to me, ROTLA alone makes the Indy series just that much better than the Bond series.
RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK was by far one of the greatest movie experiences of my LIFE! It really doesn't get much better than this. I remembered it being kind of long, but I was surprised at how fast and action-packed the story was. ROTLA clocks in at just under two hours, but the movie went by like it was only 45 minutes.
By the time the Ark-opening climax came around, I couldn't believe how much more shocking and violent it was then I remembered. By the time the credits rolled, I felt like standing up in my bedroom and giving it a standing ovation.
Defintitely one of the greatest adventure films ever made, the greatest 1930's serial ever made (even though it was released in 1981) and probably one of the top 3, or 4 greatest films ever made, period. Sorry, but CASABLANCA don't have **** on RAIDERS.
And as good as the original Star Wars movies are, I'm surprised they have a larger fanbase than the equally entertaining, if not superior INDIANA JONES films.
I really wasn't a Bond fan until 2002 when I saw DAD in theaters. It prompted me in rewatching the rest of the 007 films and I became a huge fan ever since. I can quote most of the Bond films backwards and fowards and as big a fan as they come. But rewatching RAIDERS in such along time really made me realize what a truly great film it is.
Now there is no doubt of the obvious influence Bond has had on the Indiana Jones character and series. The most two often cited and biggest influences on ROTLA were the adventure serials of the 1930's and 40's and of course the 007 films. So in the sense that Flash Gordon was the father of Luke Skywalker; James Bond was the father of Indiana Jones (years before Bond literally became Indy's father in THE LAST CRUSADE.)
Also, both series are essentially blood brothers: Sean Connery was Indy's father, TLD's General Pushkin John Rhy Davies was Indy's goodfriend Sallah, AVTAK Bond girl Alison Doody was Indy's love interest in IJ&TLC, a young Daniel Craig appeared in an episode of the THE YOUNG INDIANA JONES CHRONICLES, and both series have been copying each other's action scenes and content ever since the beginning.
Now, while I love all of the Bond films, and find them all entertaining, it pains me to admit that ROTLA is a much better film than most of them. Sorry, but as much as I love them, IMHO CR and OHMSS don't have **** on ROTLA.
Am I the only one who feels this way? Now I am currently rewatching INDIANA JONES and the TEMPLE OF DOOM and will later revisit INDIANA JONES and the LAST CRUSADE, but to me, ROTLA alone makes the Indy series just that much better than the Bond series.