Were there a bunch of negative comments earlier in the thread that were deleted?
I’m going to guess it was probably the Chinese collectors being fine fellows as usual. There’s been some criticism here but nothing over the top, and someone else said Facebook is happy (I’m not on there).Were there a bunch of negative comments earlier in the thread that were deleted?
I don't see any negative comments, but RRX is implying the response is overwhelmingly negative. I'm confused
Hehe, I never knew that. I only mostly played the main story and then the online so i never managed to get all the side quests. I'll have to go back and play it! Looks like a fun accessory to hide in anyone's collection haha.You get it after doing a few very rage inducing hunting missions for an old taxidermist lady, JM is quite fond of it and thinks it's "art" much to the dislike of his wife who constantly hides is in the most outlandish places, including a mountain top, once you find and retrieve the squirrel from all it's hiding places you get the "It's Art" trophy for your efforts.
Are the pants going to have the small tears to fit over the spurs? I always loved that detail in the first game. I understand if it isn't there to preserve the integrity of the pants.Thanks for the support guys, we're listening to all the feedback and we will fix the stuff you don't think looks good like we've always done.
The tailoring on the pants will be improved to be less baggy and we're also going to look at what can be improved on the denim vest.
As far as the first game sculpt we're going to see how it changes with proper paint but we'll probably change it with more rough sculpt details, the scowl is already there I think what's different is the eyebrows that aren't as arched as they should.
Aside from those not sure what else is there to fix but we're open to feedback.
im in california, around what time PST because i definitely dont wanna miss this!
Those tears are actually not there in the first game only the second but we'll see what can be done about it, big tears like that isn't ideal for 1/6 scale clothing.Are the pants going to have the small tears to fit over the spurs? I always loved that detail in the first game. I understand if it isn't there to preserve the integrity of the pants.
You and your colleagues are doing a grand job most of your customer base is very pleased, however the icing would be Dutch.Thanks for the support guys, we're listening to all the feedback and we will fix the stuff you don't think looks good like we've always done.
The tailoring on the pants will be improved to be less baggy and we're also going to look at what can be improved on the denim vest.
As far as the first game sculpt we're going to see how it changes with proper paint but we'll probably change it with more rough sculpt details, the scowl is already there I think what's different is the eyebrows that aren't as arched as they should.
Aside from those not sure what else is there to fix but we're open to feedback.
The material on the spurs will be different to avoid breaking.Loaded question I know, I understand the hesitancy to change anything about the second batch of Arthur to maintain the integrity of the figure for all collectors, but are there plans to address the fragile nature of the spurs/guns/etc for John?
It seems even on the second batch, guns were falling apart. I know on my first batch Arthur, cylinders fell off, and spurs broke, (I'm not familiar with gun parts, forgive me) but the panel above the lever/trigger on the rifle fell off. Will these parts be glued in place during production?
Maybe just include a second set of spurs in the figure, in case the first set breaks? Maybe make the spur "holder" out of a softer/more flexible material, so it doesn't snap? Is there some middle ground of soft PVC for the holder, and hard ABS for the spur? Just trying to brainstorm how you produce something hard enough to hold the spinning spur, but soft enough to avoid breakage.
The negative comments came from like one or two people..Were there a bunch of negative comments earlier in the thread that were deleted?
I don't see any negative comments, but RRX is implying the response is overwhelmingly negative. I'm confused
Enter your email address to join: