Yea - interchangeable terms.
I was just confused whether he meant the old Sideshow figure or something else. Other than the pants, boots and pistol, there's not lot going for that fig.
Yea - interchangeable terms.
I was just confused whether he meant the old Sideshow figure or something else. Other than the pants, boots and pistol, there's not lot going for that fig.
Oh yeah, good point - Dr. Nash - how is the skin tone on the face? Not sure if you got the Hoth figs, but they were noticeably a shade too dark in skintone to read as correct (Han a bit more so than Luke on mine.)
There is no way I am paying over 200.00 for this. This screams buyers remorse at current retail price. 150.00 figure for sure.
I feel that this Luke offering is not bad (with the helmet on), but still far over priced for what it is. At best this is a $180 figure.
The quality is still not up to industry standard, and there are virtually no other offerings within the package.
Happy for anyone that bought this release for sure, just a pass for me.
There is no way I am paying over 200.00 for this. This screams buyers remorse at current retail price. 150.00 figure for sure.
I also value the figure near where you guys would, and perhaps many others do too. But I think we should confess how subjective this all is. I think there are many people outside of this hobby who think $300 is too much to pay for any "action figure". If we are in this hobby, to one degree or another on some level we all are over paying for a bunch of toys that sit on our shelves. Again, Red Five Luke feels like $150 figure to me AT BEST. If enough of us feel that way to the point that we actually don't buy it than perhaps (depending on production costs and other factors too) the price for a figure of this quality will come down. BUT, we are also in a hobby where people pay big bucks that other people may not spend for things they like. Someone liking this X-Wing Luke and paying what they are asking for it because they really like it is not very different than any other figure bought for a lot of money; especially if people have money to burn.
I suppose the price statement are based on what you could buy last year for 150$ (SSC Hoth Luke if it was barebones like this Luke and not triple-sculpt loaded with stuff) and what you can buy right now for the same price (HT Luke with all the Tatooine paraphernalia). This not even counting the overall quality of the product.
Yeah the Chinese care so much about their own people they pay them less than the evil Westerners who take advantage of their cheap laborIt's long been clear that HT manufacturing costs are much lower than Sideshow's. If Disney expects a certain return from each unit sold, then for Sideshow to continue producing Star Wars figures, they price/offering ratio is going to look like X-Wing Luke/Darth Maul 2.0. That's not an excuse, it's just a fact.
It's long been clear that HT manufacturing costs are much lower than Sideshow's. If Disney expects a certain return from each unit sold, then for Sideshow to continue producing Star Wars figures, they price/offering ratio is going to look like X-Wing Luke/Darth Maul 2.0. That's not an excuse, it's just a fact.
Luke looks no worse than Han and Ben here. Looks more like Hamill than they do Ford and Guinness.
If the eyes on this Pilot Luke were better painted and made more livelier and the helmet had a nice worn look to it instead of looking like grey styrofoam, it'd be a little easier to swallow.
Hence why I said there.
Regardless, I don't like how HT Han or HT Ben look, even in beautified photos. Han in particular is a joke to me. Besides not a single soul has photographed this pilot Luke figure professionally, not like the usual suspects for the Hot Toys releases. I'm sure they could make this look good in the right lighting. Not that we'll ever know.
I'll never know what it's like in person (nor that Han and Ben) because I'm not buying them. It's just that, by that pic alone, he looks like he fits in despite not having the same value with his price tag.
Enter your email address to join: