The best Vader is the Vader 1 by Attakus. That one is near perfect...
The reason I prefer a pose where his lightsaber is on his belt is that Darth Vader is so much more than a saber-fighter.
He is an imposing, intimidating and threatening character. Just by his mere presene and stature, this is evident. This further establishes his connection with the force. His saber is more of a last resort. No anything that should be necessary for him to use.
That's why I prefer him "unarmed". Much like the Attakus Vader 1 shown above.
What scale is that one?
maybe EpVII is also a reason why they hold off her ?
maybe EpVII is also a reason why they hold off her ?
The reason I prefer a pose where his lightsaber is on his belt is that Darth Vader is so much more than a saber-fighter.
He is an imposing, intimidating and threatening character. Just by his mere presene and stature, this is evident. This further establishes his connection with the force. His saber is more of a last resort. No anything that should be necessary for him to use.
That's why I prefer him "unarmed". Much like the Attakus Vader 1 shown above.
I seriously doubt it. No one really knows aside from Lucas, Kennedy and a few others what the movie is going to be. Least of all Sideshow.
:
I seriously doubt it. No one really knows aside from Lucas, Kennedy and a few others what the movie is going to be. Least of all Sideshow.
Kneeling Vader from GG FTW!!
The best Vader is the Vader 1 by Attakus. That one is near perfect...
The best Vader is the Vader 1 by Attakus. That one is near perfect...
why do some of you think they will canon her out of star wars just bc of the new movies?
she is probably one of the biggest EU charactors beside Revan, Malgus, and probably Thrawn. even if she doesnt have a presence in the new trilogy im sure she will be refernced.
no reason to delete a major charactor.
with that said way off topic, but if they do anything to canon or something along the lines off that nature it would be keeping chewbacca from dieng on sernpidal. and who knows when the timeline for the new trilogy is gona be set in. mara and luke didnt marry until 19 ABY before that she tried to kill him.
end Rant sorry ha
why do some of you think they will canon her out of star wars just bc of the new movies?
she is probably one of the biggest EU charactors beside Revan, Malgus, and probably Thrawn. even if she doesnt have a presence in the new trilogy im sure she will be refernced.
no reason to delete a major charactor.
with that said way off topic, but if they do anything to canon or something along the lines off that nature it would be keeping chewbacca from dieng on sernpidal. and who knows when the timeline for the new trilogy is gona be set in. mara and luke didnt marry until 19 ABY before that she tried to kill him.
end Rant sorry ha
After the Battle of Yavin.
These are all good points. I would like to see a Thrawn Trilogy but I think they may focus on the children. You right this all just speculation though.
Enter your email address to join: