Marvel's Iron Fist: The Netflix Series

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Had to see what all the fuss is about, wow 12%. Did WB make this for Marvel?

But again, who cares. Watch it or don't.

I'll watch it cause I don't have anything to do during the night.
 
I wouldn't know if there are more than one since I don't care enough to search. :lol

My question still stands though; Don't people judge something for themselves anymore?

Snoop, serious question, do you look reviews of statues or figures before buying them? Do you read people's opinions of figures before spending the cash on getting it?

And the show has like 20 negative early reviews and only 5 positive ones :lol :lol
 
Nope.

If I like something I buy it. Other people's opinions don't matter to me; only my own.

giphy.gif
 
I'll watch it because only half the series was reviewed. So maybe it gets better in the second half and gives an ending that is worth it.
 
I just don't trust the reviews for this, at all. They seem to have an agenda. Of the few that I've read, thus far, they all list first, their opposition to Marvel deciding not to reimagine the lead character as a different ethnicity. To me, that has nothing to do with the quality of the stories or the acting. Maybe the show is good and maybe it's not, but I'll decide for myself on this one. I have zero confidence in the objectivity of these reviews.
 
My question still stands though; Don't people judge something for themselves anymore?

Not at all. As soon as BvS garnered its negative reviews people jumped on the bashing bandwagon a week before seeing the film themselves. Same with Trank's FF. People love to hate.
 
Not at all. As soon as BvS garnered its negative reviews people jumped on the bashing bandwagon a week before seeing the film themselves. Same with Trank's FF. People love to hate.

Just like as soon as that crappy Logan movie had some paid critics rave about it people jumped on the bandwagon calling it better than the dark knight even though logan is very mediocre. People dont think for themselves for sure

:exactly: :goodpost:
 
Okay, I went back and read several more reviews from Rotten Tomatoes (currently there are 17 reviews-15 of them are negative). I read about 10 of them, including the two positive ones. I will say that there were a few criticisms about the show, that I could see may have merit. Having said that, of the reviews that I read, all of the following publications listed as either their main or one of their first listed criticisms, Danny's ethnicity not being Asian: 20 Film Ink, IO9, Daily Dot, Entertainment Weekly, A.V. Club, Vulture, and Variety (there may be more, because as I said, I only got through about 10 of the 17). Of these publications, several of them included the criticism about Danny's ethnicity in the first two or three paragraphs. The review in Vulture, while making the criticism about Danny's ethnicity, even included a link to an article that they had previously written titled "Why Should Netflix Have Cast an Asian-American Iron Fist?" In addition to these articles, there was at least one other article that made the same criticism less overtly by choosing their wording a little more carefully. I'm paraphrasing here, but they said something to the effect of, "while Jessica Jones and Luke Cage made their protagonists interesting by showing you the world through the lens of a woman, or an African American, there is simply nothing interesting about the character of Danny Rand." So, at least one publication was a little more careful in its phrasing, but they were basically making the same point.
I'll say again, "Iron Fist" may be a bad show, but after reading several of these reviews, I can tell that many of the reviewers aren't using the same criteria that I will use to determine that. So, I'm just going to make that determination for myself.
 
Just like as soon as that crappy Logan movie had some paid critics rave about it people jumped on the bandwagon calling it better than the dark knight even though logan is very mediocre. People dont think for themselves for sure

:exactly: :goodpost:

I didn't even know what RT had given Logan when I left the theater opening night at 10 and posted "10/10" On my Insta. I found out the day after via all the memes (on Insta).

I'll never nor will ever let a stupid community consensus dictate how I feel about art.
 
I didn't even know what RT had given Logan when I left the theater opening night at 10 and posted "10/10" On my Insta. I found out the day after via all the memes (on Insta).

I'll never nor will ever let a stupid community consensus dictate how I feel about art.

I was called Bizarro crows in the batman v superman thread because of the 180 turn i did after i saw it and became a hater.
I went from extremely hopeful to full hater when i saw it.

But yeah, bvs was only hated because of critics. Had nothing to do with being awful.

Your point goes both ways. Does logan deserve a 90% tomato score? F-- no....

Deserves a 65% at most .... thats being generous. People praise it cuz of the hype
 
I was called Bizarro crows in the batman v superman thread because of the 180 turn i did after i saw it and became a hater.
I went from extremely hopeful to full hater when i saw it.

But yeah, bvs was only hated because of critics. Had nothing to do with being awful.

Your point goes both ways. Does logan deserve a 90% tomato score? F-- no....

Deserves a 65% at most .... thats being generous. People praise it cuz of the hype

I give Logan a 10/10. Seen it three times and my rating hasn't dropped.

The performances are a huge part of what makes it so riveting. Jackman, Stewart, Keen, Merchant and Holbrook are fantastic.

The tone is superb and steady which is something difficult to find in CBMs today (MCU) and the critique it makes of what CBMs have become (MCU) definitely elevates it further.

I've met people that genuinely don't understand Logan. People that have no idea what it says about the Western and about its genre. Mangold inserted so much in there but I guess people still miss it. Also, I keep reading stuff about "The clone was stupid" but the idea wasn't to use a clone but rather a mirror image. A physical manifestation of his greatest torment.
 
I give Logan a 10/10. Seen it three times and my rating hasn't dropped.

The performances are a huge part of what makes it so riveting. Jackman, Stewart, Keen, Merchant and Holbrook are fantastic.

The tone is superb and steady which is something difficult to find in CBMs today (MCU) and the critique it makes of what CBMs have become (MCU) definitely elevates it further.

I've met people that genuinely don't understand Logan. People that have no idea what it says about the Western and about its genre. Mangold inserted so much in there but I guess people still miss it. Also, I keep reading stuff about "The clone was stupid" but the idea wasn't to use a clone but rather a mirror image. A physical manifestation of his greatest torment.

You give logan 10/10, I give bvs a 3/10
My point isnt even to debate your love for logan, but the fact that u say people only hated bvs due to the critics
Which is false. Bvs was a messy movie
 
I just don't trust the reviews for this, at all. They seem to have an agenda. Of the few that I've read, thus far, they all list first, their opposition to Marvel deciding not to reimagine the lead character as a different ethnicity. To me, that has nothing to do with the quality of the stories or the acting. Maybe the show is good and maybe it's not, but I'll decide for myself on this one. I have zero confidence in the objectivity of these reviews.

Right on! :hi5: +1
 
How can you trust reviews that complain about the ethnicity of the main character when that's the one thing they got right?
 
Back
Top