Double post. Please delete.
Also, hearing how they cant do cargo pants, I quickly went ans checked my 3A figs, cargo pants, with 2 punches on each leg
5: We gotta strike while the iron is hot on these movie releases. Fans of the more classic stuff can and will wait (News Flash: You have both the Marvel and DC movie licensing! The iron will always be hot for the foreseeable near future! 2-4 movies a year between the two of em!
I get what you're saying, but I think I agree with Lee in the sense that there will ALWAYS be a new flavour of the week. By Mezco's logic we will never get those classics we want because there will always be some new superhero film that needs their attention. What they need to be doing is striking while the iron is hot, yes, but also at least sprinkling in some figures based on older interpretations of the characters a couple times a year. Otherwise figures like the 89 Batman will just keep getting pushed back over and over and over.I saw the interview, and I understand their logic in regards to focusing on the current films.
Reeve Sups, Adam West show, 89 Bats, TDK, have all stood the test of time. They will always be popular and new merchandise will sell. And if they say they can wait several years, then clearly it means they know they won't lose the license.
Suicide Squad and BVS? Not so much. Those are just flavor of the month costumes and characters...until JL or the next DCEU film...if they even make more films. So yeah, there's a time limit for those specific versions of those characters since their popularity hasn't been proven yet.
Pierre looks like a great guy and someone Id hang out with, but boy does this hit the nail on the mfing head.The interview really highlights how disconnected they are from the fan base:
1: No Robin because he's unrealistic (cause we're like Nolan...their toys based on comics, it's all unrealistic! 0_O)
2: Accessory packs would cheapen the brand (No...your crappy interpretations do that for you)
3: Wolverine cargo shorts really bring out the outdoorsman in any mutant
4: We had no ideal how popular Knightmare Bats would be
5: We gotta strike while the iron is hot on these movie releases. Fans of the more classic stuff can and will wait (News Flash: You have both the Marvel and DC movie licensing! The iron will always be hot for the foreseeable near future! 2-4 movies a year between the two of em!
Just rewatching it is kinda disappointing to see how out of touch they seem.
Otherwise figures like the 89 Batman will just keep getting pushed back over and over and over.
When are they ever going to have time to release things like a Keaton Batman or TDKR Superman when there are 2-3 superhero blockbusters every year? They'll no doubt make a JL Affleck or JL Cavill
The Robin thing is disappointing too. I don't get it. You could easily make Robin cool. If you don't want him to be a little kid without pants, do what Bruce Timm and Co. did in 1992 for Batman the Animated series and make him a college/university student with a cool costume that has pants.
These walls they're putting up will only make for a boring toy line.
That attitude about Robin....brings back the biggest problem I had with Nolan even at the height of my fanaticism. Robin is as integral to the Batman mythos as Alfred or anything else.
Could have been just a young associate Bruce saved and trained, not necesarily living with him. Kind of a nightwing but dressed as robin, or straight up nightwing.So you wanted a child Robin in the Nolan films? Or even creepier, an adult Robin living with a 35 year old Bruce Wayne?
Doesn't necessarily mean a 12 year old kid in shorts running around, butt I don't see the problem with taking on the concept.
Maybe we'll have a better chance of seeing those classics if after JL and WW, The WB decides to put their DCU on hold, or scrap entirely. But maybe there would be another excuse even still
That attitude about Robin....brings back the biggest problem I had with Nolan even at the height of my fanaticism. Robin is as integral to the Batman mythos as Alfred or anything else.
So you wanted a child Robin in the Nolan films? Or even creepier, an adult Robin living with a 35 year old Bruce Wayne?
I wouldn't mind a child Robin in the DCEU. That world is messed up enough for a Hit Girl type Robin.
Could have been just a young associate Bruce saved and trained, not necesarily living with him. Kind of a nightwing but dressed as robin, or straight up nightwing.
Not that Nolan needed a robin.
The one thing missing for me in the Nolan films was Robin....apart from a decent Batsuit, decent Batmobile and the Penguin.
The Robin thing is disappointing too. I don't get it. You could easily make Robin cool. If you don't want him to be a little kid without pants, do what Bruce Timm and Co. did in 1992 for Batman the Animated series and make him a college/university student with a cool costume that has pants.
No I know, thats what Im saying, there was no need to have robin in the trilogy, but you see how it can easily work in Nolans universe.The way things played out in each film, I don't think there was enough room to include that subplot. They kind of did it in TDKR with Blake, but not really. If Nolan were to make a fourth film and expand on that idea of Bruce returning to Gotham, training Blake, and becoming a team for at least one film, it could work...maybe.
What Im saying is that Mezcos reason to ignore Robin is just dumb.
Enter your email address to join: