What really baffles me is that "better", regarding action figures, will depends on subjective taste.
This is a pointless argument, imo.
Even when people try to use "objective" aspects, they depend on the collectors taste (even to select which objective aspect is more important).
Better articulation: maybe the person collecting is not that into extreme poses. Or a specific asriculation is more important for someone's taste.
More durable soft goods: that's quite hard to compare and test.
"mezflair" or "Ashley Wood style": again depends on your taste.
I do prefer Mezco over 3A, but that's my personal preference and I really don't need any validation from others. My main reason to hand in threads is to see pictures and comments about a figure (specially objective comments, that present characteristic that might help me decide if I want to buy something).
I don't need people telling me what to buy, and I do believe most collectors in this forum are adults and competent enough to make their own decisions as well. The main objective of the forum, in this respect, is to help us make informed decisions (IMO).
Also, this idea that we have to give "Mezco it's due" is strange one imo, that "due" depends solely on each collectors taste and preferences.
Comparing both companies is really healthy and helpful, imo, but give up on trying to convince each other.
Sorry if my post seems harsh (I'm really not sure if it does, language and cultural barriers have played some part in me sounding harsher then intended in the past), I do understand and empathize with both sides regarding their passion for their collections, but you guys are not going anywhere.