All teams and coaches have cheated. Some get caught (i.e. Belicheck), some don't (ie. Bill Walsh). Case closed.
Atlanta should try cheating right now.
All teams and coaches have cheated. Some get caught (i.e. Belicheck), some don't (ie. Bill Walsh). Case closed.
Steroids is cheating, and 90% of players probably juice. I've seen respected players say that they push the rules as far as they will go in order to get as much of an advantage over their opponents as possible. Where do you draw the line of what is acceptable "cheating" and what isn't?
"There isn't a team in the league that doesn't try to steal signals [but] I haven't heard about teams recording footage like the Patriots were," said one longtime NFL assistant coach. "But you can bet everybody is trying to steal in some way. In fact, you can go to any NFL game and you'll find some coach whose sole job is to look for defensive signals."
Atlanta should try cheating right now.
The thing I don't understand is that Tebow beat Cam Newton out head to head at Florida. He put up better stats then Cam in college. Minus mechanics and being a criminal they both had the same knocks against them coming out. Now all of a sudden Cam and his horrible accuracy can be over looked but Tebow and his issues cant? If all Cam does is win games when is that going to start? Tebow had a better record in his first three games as a rookie then Cam does. I say give the kid a shot.
Seems like a pretty arbitrary distinction to me. . .cheating is cheating. And does the question of whether or not the form of cheating makes the games more watchable or exciting really play a role? Because if so, I say let's classify the WWE as a legitimate sports entity. So they rig the outcomes. So what? It makes for more drama and excitement!Secretly taping their game plan and signals would be a line. Kinda unfair when you know exactly what they're going to do. Most of your game plan is fooling your opponent on offense and defense. And a good majority of the players use performance enhancing substances. Some just to heal quicker and some for a competitive edge. The League actually allows certain substances and college does as well. Body builders use major mass building substances, that's why there's an all natural division in the pros where those aren't allowed. Let's face it, people don't want to see smaller, weaker players in unexciting games.
The Jets are fathoms above what they've been in recent memory. The Pats eeked out a decent win, but still have to play @ NY yet. Plus, the Jets went to the past 2 conference title games. Where were the Pats at? Oh that's right, at home not playing.
Are you are fellow Broncos fan?
what happened to ATL? they were so many experts pick to be in the super bowl this yr. have they really fallen off that much this yr?
I didn't even see anyone pick Atlanta to win their own division. The first two games they tried to be a team they're not. They thought Matt Ryan was ready to be elite and drafted Julio Jones and wanted to be a pass happy Saints clone. Problem is, Matt Ryan is an average qb. Falcons came to terms with this by game three and got back to what they do best, run first and often and play action off of that. They looked good early last night but that leads to the biggest problem. Absolutely no defense and dating back to last year, the inability to finish games.
1. Peter King of SI picked the Falcons over the Chargers in the Super Bowl.
https://insidesportsillustrated.com...cts-falcons-over-chargers-in-super-bowl-xlvi/
2. The NFL has a dearth of good QBs. There are 20 teams out there that would stand in line for his services.
3. I agree with your statement on the Falcon defense.
SI still exists?
1. If he's right, I'm certainly not going to hold it against him.
2. 20 other teams would have an average qb at the end of the day.
3. No chance the D improves next year either since we gave up our draft for Julio Jones. Not unless we go hog wild in free agency.
Enter your email address to join: