I think you'll be fine. 25k is a ^^^^ load of money. If you can buy food, you're golden soul brutha!
I think you meant to say, 250K!
Yeah, see I knew I was wrong there....I ment 250k...ok so who makes more then that.
Yeah, see I knew I was wrong there....I ment 250k...ok so who makes more then that.
I don't know if anyone else has heard this yet, but Hawaii, the only state in the US to offer a universal health care plan, has ended it today, citing budget shortfalls as the primary reason.
The real reason? Because the way the plan was structured, it was supposed to be a "wealth-sharing" system, where the "rich" would continue to buy insurance out-of-pocket, and the "poor" would be cared for by the state. but after only a few months, many people decided that that they shouldn't have to pay for something that someone else gets for "free", so they started canceling their private coverage and using the state-sponsored system. And then it was unable to meet the demand.
Does anyone really thing that exact same thing will NOT happen if they try it at the federal level? They will either have to triple the taxes collected to pay for it, in order to accommodate the people (like me) who will refuse to pay twice for health insurance, or else they will fail, just as Hawaii has.
Not me, but its still unfair for the small family business. What do you think about Joe the plumber? Or even what if Joe the toy seller wants to expand his business?
I don't know if anyone else has heard this yet, but Hawaii, the only state in the US to offer a universal health care plan, has ended it today, citing budget shortfalls as the primary reason.
The real reason? Because the way the plan was structured, it was supposed to be a "wealth-sharing" system, where the "rich" would continue to buy insurance out-of-pocket, and the "poor" would be cared for by the state. but after only a few months, many people decided that that they shouldn't have to pay for something that someone else gets for "free", so they started canceling their private coverage and using the state-sponsored system. And then it was unable to meet the demand.
Does anyone really think that exact same thing will NOT happen if they try it at the federal level? They will either have to triple the taxes collected to pay for it, in order to accommodate the people (like me) who will refuse to pay twice for health insurance, or else they will fail, just as Hawaii has.
You shouldn't be punished for being successful, and you certainly shouldn't be rewarded through other people's tax dollars for being lazy and not wanting to work hard and hoping someone else takes care of your needs.
It's socialism. I AM COMPLETELY FLABBERGASTED THAT UNITED STATES CITIZENS ARE WELCOMING IT WITH OPEN ARMS.
Does anyone really think that exact same thing will NOT happen if they try it at the federal level?
Or our family biz, my pops takes in over 250k but after he has to pay people it's not even close to that amount. But with obamas super awesome plan My pops, whose body is basicly destroyed can go ahead and work harder to support a buch of lazy slackers!The though of obama in office makes me sick!
Progressive taxation isn't punishment. Federal studies show most people who accept welfare do so for a limited period of time. Your entire second clause is a myth.
98% of small businesses don't make a taxable income over $250K a year. You're supposing that the income tax is on gross income rather than net.
I know that Welfare and Food Stamps helped my Mother immensely when she was taking care of my sister and I, alone.
Well, I know that a couple that are both RN's could make a net income of $250k after busting their butts. It's not just small business, but it does not matter if it's that 98% that don't make the $250k. It would be just unfair. How would you feel honestly if you make $250k next year and found out your money will be spread to the lower income. I would be pissed. I know people would say I would be happy with making that amount of cash. But would you want to give it away after all your hard work?
For example: If a small-business owner makes $210,000 in taxable income, he edges into the 33% bracket, one of the two top tax rates that Obama would like to raise.
But he would pay the higher tax only on the amount that exceeds the cutoff - in 2007, the two top tax rates applied to single filers with income of $160,850 or more and joint filers with income of at least $195,850. As a single filer, this business owner would see his federal taxes increase $1,475 under Obama's plan, which calls for raising the 33% tax rate to 36%.
"While Obama does favor raising the top two rates, the quote is not true because not all the small business income of those in the top two rates is taxed at the 33% and 35% rates," said Gerald Prante, a senior economist at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.
The bottom line: McCain's claim only works by using an overly broad definition of what counts as a "small business" - and even with that definition, fewer than 2% of business owners would be hit by Obama's proposed rate increase. For those who are affected, the increase would be levied only on a part of their earnings, not all of them.
I also think that the health care system needs to be overhauled. My Wife can't get insurance because of a condition she had when she was a teen. I can't be insured for any skin treatments because I had skin cancer. We can't afford insurance at all right now...