Who cares? Move on already.![]()
I'm the one being subject to abuse![]()
Good price?!
It's 20" tall with a huge base. The pictures are so dark it's hard to see any detail.
It's a bloody joke! The es is taking longer and longer to be revealed.
When did MOS go up?
No Ex suits me, U.K collector; but I can't see them doing it as standard. They would lose a huge amount of direct sales.
Lack if Es sucks!
Your sig...
Now that's a pose I like!
This looks like your dad at a disco.![]()
$400 for a 16" fully sculpted statue, with minimum detail, on a 4" rocky base reasonable?!![]()
And pretty small for a 'big robot'![]()
And that exactly what I was doing until these two jerks calked me out![]()
Here, I did it. These are what I thought was incessant bemoaning. Not moaning as you misquoted me.
My work is done here...
I didn't even realize it WAS you!![]()
This one was alright. The one from Australia was the coolest to me at comic-con.
I agree. Striker Eureka looks much better. I'd prefer a different pose on Gipsy Danger.
I'm torn on this piece. I absolutely loved the fight scenes in Pacific Rim and loved the jaegers even more. Gipsy has some serious weapons which, to me, seem like an obvious choice to include on a very detailed (and pricey) statue. I'm not sure if I want to drop $400 on a product with such an awkward pose (a pose that I hope to overlook).
And I agree with the light up feature. It would be great to see the reactor glow IMHO.
I agree. Missed opportunity. Should have had the plasma caster at the very least.
Please tell me that Hot Toys is doing an articulated light up version of this bad boy!!
I positively hate the negativity in this thread.
But I do love Pacific Rim!![]()