I enjoyed R4... didn't like R3.
Well, part II is more iconic than FB, but yeah, the first is the best. I doubt the new film will be as good as FB. I hope this film is better than R4 tho.
Part 2 was one of the greatest times I ever had in the movies... But it has not aged well at all. I am not even sure I would say its a good movie. Its far better the part 3 though.
Rambo 4 was not great but easy enough to sit through and enjoy.
FB is lightning in a bottle and a film that cant be replicated due to the type of story it was.. I mean I he going to go to another town and get picked on by a sheriff?? They had to go in the direction they went. So I don't expect this to be FB quality but I hope its not as corny as part 2 or 3. I hope its a bit more fun then part 4
Even the videogame was more like 2 than FB lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think part II is good. The score is great, the action is pretty good overall, and while the plot is very simple and straight forward, it's solid for an action film. I like how the film slowly builds from stealth and low key action towards the third act climatic one man army all out attack.The film even had a "strong" female character rescuing the "macho" hero of the film. How often did you see that in the 80's? I give it credit for being so drastically different from the first film. They could have easily done a remake of the first film in a new town or something silly, but instead they made a film that was not only different, but also copied and parodied endlessly. It created the prototypical image of the shirtless muscular action hero with a big gun of the 80's. Interestingly, every Rambo sequel including the new one follows the premise of part 2, which is Rambo coming out of exile or retirement to rescue someone. In a way, part 2 was for better or worse far more influential than FB. The weakest part of part 2 and every other sequel is the lack of a great main villain, but I don't really hold that against the film or franchise. Many other franchises like Indy, John Wick, Bond, Bourne, Die Hard, Lethal Weapon..etc, didn't have memorable or great villains in the sequels.
Even the videogame was more like 2 than FB lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't know how big of a hit FB was in the theaters.. I think it got its second wind on home video and HBO.
Rambo 2 made the character a phenomenon.
First Blood was a hit, but not in the top 10. It was 13th. It made 125 mill world wide with a budget of 14 million, so it was a really big success. However, Rocky 3, which came out the same year, was the second biggest film of 1982 and made 270 mill world wide.
I guess the success of FB and later the home video and television exposure made it more popular, because just 3 years late in 85, Part 2 made 300 mill world wide and was the second biggest film of the year, while Rocky 4, which also came out the same year was the third biggest film with another 300 mill. Talk about a one-two punch.
First Blood was a hit, but not in the top 10. It was 13th. It made 125 mill world wide with a budget of 14 million, so it was a really big success. However, Rocky 3, which came out the same year, was the second biggest film of 1982 and made 270 mill world wide.
I guess the success of FB and later the home video and television exposure made it more popular, because just 3 years late in 85, Part 2 made 300 mill world wide and was the second biggest film of the year, while Rocky 4, which also came out the same year was the third biggest film with another 300 mill. Talk about a one-two punch.
50% of that due to Mr T and "Eye of the Tiger"
Enter your email address to join: