RATE or REVIEW The Last Movie You Watched.

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Over the past two weeks watched the following:

Logan - 8.5
Lethal Weapon - 8.5
Lethal Weapon 2 - 8.0
Fight Club - 8.0
Tombstone - 7.0
Jerry McGuire - 7.0
Private Parts 6.5
 
John Wick 2 is a 8.5/10 for me. If you liked the 1st one, you'll like the sequel.
Logan 7.5/10 for me. Easily the best Wolverine solo movie, but that ain't saying much. It was pretty predictable IMO. However, the chemistry between the 3 leads was very good and the action is what we've been waiting a long time for. No punches pulled in this one.
 
Poltergeist 3D (remake) - 4/10

A decent attempt, and I love most of Sam Rami's stuff (minus the turkey baster lol). I give it points for having a couple of tense scary moments. Otherwise what really ruined it for me was that they used every generic scare tactic. It's like they exhausted the scary movie bag of tricks. Not to mention it's a movie that didn't need to be remade, but I leave that out of my judgement of the film.
 
Super 8 7/10

Evil ET.....but fun, definetly the precursor to Stranger Things...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
I also like Super 8, I remember when it came out it got lackluster reviews so I never felt like watching it, until I did, and I liked it a lot.

I still wonder if it's somehow tied to the Cloververse.
 
Logan had a handful of very touching moments. Beautiful really. Had me tearing up tbo. Great movie.
 
Super 8 was a classier, more restrained version of Stranger Things. . .but I liked it a lot less.

Justice League: Dark: 7/10

*spoilers* I liked a lot of this one, particularly Constantine (who was the star of the movie really), but was disappointed with how Swamp Thing was integrated and used. They shouldn't have even bothered including him if they couldn't think of a better rationale for it, but since he's one of the more recognizable Vertigo-types, I guess they felt obligated. At least they kept his drive and moral focus more or less the same as it was in the Moore run. Not sure why Holland's body was still inside him, though? Or what happened when he was separated from it? Seems like they should have addressed that. . .

Also, I guess this is Nu 52 Dr. Destiny, but I thought he was much more interesting as handled by Neil Gaiman in Sandman. Essentially the equivalent of a Bat-villain nut-job who just so happens to have these powers, and whose powers drive him madder and madder over time, rather than some super powered wizard from medieval times. If you haven't read it, that was one of the more memorable, and disturbing arcs of the whole Sandman run, btw.

Zpki7JO.png
 
Back
Top