RATE or REVIEW The Last Movie You Watched.

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Just watched Sam Raimi's first two Spider-Man films since I haven't watched them in a while. Both are great superhero classics each worth four out of five stars for what they are, IMHO. I'm in the process of watching Spider-Man 3 to get a better idea as to the true differences between it and the previous two (aside from the obvious), and what really makes it bad by comparison.
 
Beauty and the Beast 6/10

A Disney Fan review
People are raving about this, but its really not better then the animated one. As much as I like to look at Emma Watson, the auto tune, phaser and other effects they laid on her voice are just so obvious its painful to hear. They should have gotten an unknown who could actually sing the parts....because her acting would have likly been on par with Waston.

The singing for the rest of the cast is lack luster....the CGI is also ......even for a kids film. There were a few nice changes, but for he most part ...very forgettable remake of a film that required no remake.

Note: if you want to a true complete story of B&B i highly recommend the Broadway play. It is outstanding. once you see that, you will really appreciate how unneeded this film is.

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
Well I finished watching Spider-Man 3 last night, and I'm sorry to say that there are multiple problems with it aside from Venom.

First, the whole film just doesn't have the same feel/charm as the first two. It starts out good and you expect that it will be like the first two, but it isn't. Second, compared to her role in the previous films, Mary Jane's character seems a lot more self-centered. Third, after two films, they expect us to believe that Flint Marco was actually responsible for killing Uncle Ben. It's one of those common "you thought this was true from the beginning but it isn't" stories that often appear in trilogies. I won't even bother talking about Topher Grace's Eddie Brock/Venom because you all know darn well why he wasn't well received.

Spider-Man 3 is one of those movies where when I'm watching it I ask myself "Am I being too hard on it? Is this actually an OK superhero movie?" However, when left to think about it, I can't help but feel that it was a massive waste of potential. 3 out of 5 stars.
 
The Legend of Tarzan: 5.5/10

I felt like I wasted 2 hours of my life, but not in... "bad" way. Just... I didn't need to see this flick, and I'm not glad I did, but... eh, I've seen worse...
 
Transformers - 6.5/10 It wasn't so bad. I expected perpetual eye rolling, but I liked it, pretty cool background noise for work.

The action did make me stop working though, very well shot action.

I expect the sequels to take a dive from here on out though.
 
Transformers - 6.5/10 It wasn't so bad. I expected perpetual eye rolling, but I liked it, pretty cool background noise for work.

The action did make me stop working though, very well shot action.

I expect the sequels to take a dive from here on out though.

I like the helicopter scene, when it turns into a Trasformers and attacks the military base and Optimus Prime's speech with the Linking Park song.
 
Now this we can agree on :lol

If you had to pick, which would you say was better GF1 or GF2?

GF1

The first 20 minutes alone has more iconic quotes and moments than most films.

However, I love GF2's ending. The flashback and then Michael by himself thinking about the past.

Maybe my favorite ending of all time.

The flashbacks are all great too.

I can see why some might prefer it over the first film.

GF3 is underrated, and only because it's not as good as two perfect films.
 
Agreed.

I think GF1 is better by just a hair.

It's been years since I've watched GF3, I remember hating it a lot, mostly because of Sofia Coppola. I have to give it another watch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top