4/10
Im a Tolkien fan because of the books. LoTR seemed a solid series to me simply because putting the source material into the cinematic medium and making it work, specially I was impressed how they managed to actually make The Two Towers work.... But with the Hobbit, I just feel PJ is stretching it too far.
1. It doesnt feel as 'organic' as the LOTR, the CGI rendered goblins/Wargs or the HFR.
2. In LOTR he chopped off the right bits of the book like Tom Bombadil and all which made it work, here to stretch things he ADDS characters like Azog and all which I feel really does nothing.
3. The HFR really made the movie feel like a HD BBC Telefilm in wierd way, I cant really explain but you guys will understand what Im trying to say.
The Best Part of the Film?
The Riddles in the Dark part... Gollum redeems every bit of the film. The patheticness of his character Im sure managed to invoke pity from the audience. The sequence really proves how great some of the source material from the film could be like
A lot of sequences specially Radagast and all was not a part of the source, events were remade, but I can see the only reason for that was to extend the film. It did nothing more. Im sure those who are fans of the 'film franchise' because of the films - which may have been their introduction to the world of Tolkien can maybe be delighted by this, but no it didnt work for me personally as my mind was constantly shuttling back to what I had read 10 or so years back.
The movie didnt match upto my expectations which were pretty low ever since I got to know it was going to be made a trilogy. It just doesnt seem to have the 'heart' as such. Something like TDKR, only TDKR was the ending of a trilogy. To best sum it up can be Tolkien's own words...
The Reviewer at The Daily Telegraph summed up EXACTLY my feelings about the film
"Like butter that has been scraped over too much bread” was how JRR Tolkien described the supernatural world-weariness of Bilbo Baggins in the opening chapter of The Lord of the Rings.
This phrase, incomparably Tolkien-esque in its syntactic neatness and semantic beauty, is also a perfect description for the first installment in Peter Jackson’s three-part adaptation of The Hobbit, which I now fear is doomed to be referred to as a ‘prequel’ to Tolkien’s fantasy magnum opus.