Eli26
Super Freak
Eli trollin?
Hey, I am keeping up with the festive spirits that is the Holiday season and the Hobbit! There are trolls in the film, no?
Eli trollin?
I'm shocked that anyone could sum it all up with "cheesy".
Hey, I am keeping up with the festive spirits that is the Holiday season and the Hobbit! There are trolls in the film, no?
I wish the ending for ROTK would be longer. I can never get enough of it. When they get on the ship at the Grey Haven, I keep saying to myself "I need more. This can't be it".
Eh, I don't understand what's wrong with that scene within the context of the story and entire film. On it's own? Yeah, it's pretty cheesy but,
1. It opens up the same way it did in Fellowship of the Ring, Frodo awakening in high contrast light with Gandalf at his side
2. Old friends greeting Frodo, after thinking he died
Over the course of two films the Fellowship had been separated, gone their separate ways. In terms of film, how else do you present the group meeting again for the first time? Gandalf is there again, watching Frodo. Frodo thought he died in film one. So his surprised look is a natural one.
He hasn't seen his two buddies for two films. Last time he saw them, they were being chased by Uruk-Hai and could have been most likely captured and dead. From Merry and Pippin's perspective, Frodo could have died on his journey to Mount Doom, and they haven't seen their friend for two films.
Gimli is just being Gimli.
Legolas is just being Legolas.
Aragorn is just being Aragorn.
Sam comes in. He's been Frodo's bodyguard/friend and ally the entire series. Even after being told to go home, he stuck by his friend's side. There's an unspoken understanding there. None of the other members of the Fellowship have gone what they've gone through with Gollum, Sauron, Mordor etc.
Only thing missing is mention of Boromir or something.
Not sure how else that scene could play. Yeah it's a little upbeat, and the fade to black, trick endings are annoying, but the scene itself? I don't see anything terribly wrong with it. How else are the characters supposed to act.
As much as I love that voice over, yeah, I agree, it works. It's cheesy, but there ain't nothin wrong with cheese. It's supposed to be happy and cheerful. The biggest climax almost ever just occurred, you need a moment of pure joy. It makes you happy. You feel good.
Wish I had been old enough to see the LotR trilogy in theaters.
Finally had a chance to see it today in regular 3D. I would have liked to have seen the 48 FPS, but my schedule wouldn't allow it; my wife and I wouldn't have been able to get our kids from the bus stop (for a brief moment, I thought that they could wait there for a little bit ).
There is no perfect movie. But for a Tolkien fan, this was damn close. A 9 for me. If I could add percentage points, I'd give it a 9.75. Is it better than any of the three LOTR movies? IMO, no. But you can't compare the two "trilogies".
I can understand the casual fan or non-Tolkien fan having issues with the film. My wife commented that Peter Jackson "needs an editor" but the film "was beautifully done". Okay, I understand that. If necessary, Jackson could have left off the beginning that framed the film with "Fellowship". But I can understand why he wanted that in the film.
But sitting in the theater, watching the film start up, and hearing Howard Shore's music and the returning themes brought me back to 2001, 2002, and 2003, which were the happiest moments in cinema for me.
Can't wait to see it again.