faker
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2019
- Messages
- 850
- Reaction score
- 296
it was about a cash write off if anything. Whenever the mcu craze dies down a little more, games with be the next big movie cash in franchise. Then we'll come back to making movies of RE and they might actually be GOOD this time.I had this same thought after watching it. Capcom is on odd beast.
This movie made no sense. Why go through the effort of recreating the Spencer Mansion, and RPD, and naming the characters exactly as is (even including Ben from RE2 ... that's a really out there sub-plot) then just doing "whatever you want" with the story? Then just mashing the stories of RE and RE2 together in one movie. I mean, I guess you can, but why would you? There's plenty of story in either game as a standalone.
Oh, and the stinger with Ada, I thought that was the dumbest thing in the movie.
"Who are you?"
"My name is Ada. Ada Wong"
Like, no f'n poo. That dialogue was horrendous, clunky, and just ... you could tell no one edited the script, as that line should've been cut. And what the hell is even with that in the first place, since when did Wesker work for Ada? She works for him, or at least for the same shadowy group? Didn't the side story from RE4 have her grab the vials for him?
In any case, I think the earlier theory is pretty on the money, these movies are just made for tax-write-off/money laundering purposes.
EDIT: haha, this forum autocorrects '****' to 'poo'
I just don't understand , like you, why they thought re1+2 was a good idea, there's too many characters and plot in both to combine them.