newe82
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2010
- Messages
- 348
- Reaction score
- 0
EPIC, BEST PIECE of THE YEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EPIC, BEST PIECE of THE YEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey Binny,
First off Sabretooth is gonna be awesome. With all of your negative comments I am starting to think you are actually Buzzybean using a different screen name. You must like it because you keep posting about it.
Secondly, Nebraska is going to get their A$$ kicked coming into the Big Ten. OSU is going to own you every year. Enjoy your last cake schedule in 2010 because their are not nearly as many gimmies as you have in the Big 12. That felt good, I like talking a little junk with college football right around the corner.
No doubt the sculpt is great, but that's all IMO.
Notice the definition that is nowhere to be found on the PF.
Defense wins games... always has, always will. Bo knows defense and Bo knows Big 10 country. I'm not worried at all about schedule strength. Washington, Texass, Mizzery, A&M, and a likely championship game against OU aren't exactly 'cake' games.
Nebraska will more than hold their own in the Big 10. Not saying they'll dominate right away, but they'll be just fine.
No doubt the sculpt is great, but that's all IMO.
Notice the definition that is nowhere to be found on the PF.
Defense wins games... always has, always will. Bo knows defense and Bo knows Big 10 country. I'm not worried at all about schedule strength. Washington, Texass, Mizzery, A&M, and a likely championship game against OU aren't exactly 'cake' games.
Nebraska will more than hold their own in the Big 10. Not saying they'll dominate right away, but they'll be just fine.
The face sculpt is not bad, but the wonderful body sculpt and definition is really lost under the cloth. Maybe it's just a preference of taste but to me, this would have been really awesome if it was done more like the Gambit PF or Black Panther PF. I wonder if this will be the last we see of the cloth covered muscles in male PFs.
highly doubtful since they still sell quite well depending on the choice of character.
No doubt the sculpt is great, but that's all IMO.
Notice the definition that is nowhere to be found on the PF.
i dunno about you guys but having come over from collecting 1/6, PFs seemed to be the natural choice.
The clothes may hide the muscle definition some but it looks more realistic.
While i like fully sculpted pieces as well, PFs offer a variety to just sculpt and paint.
What i really hope SS would do is STICK to 1:4 scale whether PF or comiquettes
i dunno about you guys but having come over from collecting 1/6, PFs seemed to be the natural choice.
The clothes may hide the muscle definition some but it looks more realistic.
While i like fully sculpted pieces as well, PFs offer a variety to just sculpt and paint.
What i really hope SS would do is STICK to 1:4 scale whether PF or comiquettes
Don't see Sideshow making comiquettes and PF all 1:4 scale at all. Why standardize it when they can sell the same character twice in 1:5 and 1:4?
i dunno about you guys but having come over from collecting 1/6, PFs seemed to be the natural choice.
The clothes may hide the muscle definition some but it looks more realistic.
While i like fully sculpted pieces as well, PFs offer a variety to just sculpt and paint.
What i really hope SS would do is STICK to 1:4 scale whether PF or comiquettes
I just don't get how a person could say that the cloth makes comic-based PFs more 'realistic'. The idea of taking a cartoon and trying to make it look real obviously doesn't translate well. The muscles and definition just can't be replicated with cloth and that's my issue with most PFs.
I want a statue to look like a 3-D replica of what I see on the pages of a comic. The diorama of these two does that extremely well, so sadly that will stay as my representation of these for now.
Don't see Sideshow making comiquettes and PF all 1:4 scale at all. Why standardize it when they can sell the same character twice in 1:5 and 1:4?
Doesn't bother me a bit as long as the top characters get representation in both lines.