They could do alternative gary oldman as gigantic were-bat/robinwilliams form also.
Do I think Hot Toys should literally remake 12" figures based on the classic Universal horror films? Despite many fans wanting it, I really don't think so and wouldn't be that supportive, even though I do think a HT Karloff Frankenstein Monster or Lugosi Dracula would be amazing.
Why? Sideshow's line is truly iconic, and truly one of the first quality 1/6th scale collections ever produced for any licence. I wouldn't collect the HT or SSC figures I do now, if it wasn't for the Sideshow Monsters. If Hot Toys tackled that licence, not only would they not delve into the wealth of characters SSC did, it would undermine what made that line unique.
However, I would be more than supportive if Hot Toys got the licences to do a line based on remakes/reboots of the Universal horror films. Could you imagine quality, high-end detailed versions of the following:
Bram Stoker's Dracula
Gary Oldman as Vlad The Impaler
Old man Dracula w/ bun-hair, red kimono
London Pimp Dracula
Dracula in golden gown
Anthony Hopkins as Van Helsing
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
Kenneth Branagh as Baron Victor Frankenstein
Robert DeNiro as the Monster
The Mummy
Arnold Vosloo as Imhotep
black robes, w/ mask version
Rotting "Juicy" Mummy version
Egyptian Priest/Fully revitalized version
Brendan Fraser as Rick O'Connell
The Wolf Man
Benicio Del Toro as The Wolf Man
Benicio Del Toro as Larry Talbot (maybe a DX 2-in-1)
Of course HT is busier with some of their juicer, more lucrative properties, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who'd buy more than a couple characters off this list.
Quite frankly, I don't understand how HT doing a line of UM would "undermine" SST's line... that's like saying Medicom's new alien figure "undermined" the ones they did in the 80's. Or that HT's version undermines the original Kenner alien. Or that DiD's WWII figures undermine the old G.I.Joes from the 70's.
Sideshow's fantastic figures will remain fantastic figures no matter what.
And if another company decides to have a go at them and make them better, then that's wonderful.
I have a bunch of Sideshow's UM's and I love them, they are among the best figures Sideshow has ever made and among the best 1/6 figures ever made, period. That doesn't mean I am not aware of the shortcomings of those figures.
Honestly, I don't get why people simply don't want to see better representations of older figures.
I'm not saying I want HT to do them, I'm just saying I find it silly that people don't want better figures.
Save for the body itself, which the Buck was perfect for anyway, how much "better" could HT do them to justify us paying $150 for them?
oldam Drac is an easy one.. you basically have 3+ figs for one character.
Save for the body itself, which the Buck was perfect for anyway, how much "better" could HT do them to justify us paying $150 for them?
Depends on each character...
Lugosi's Dracula is a so-so likeness IMHO, and the paint apps weren't very good. The outfit is pretty bad as well. However, I don't think such a figure would cost 150...
Karloff as Frankenstein's monster has a fantastic HS but, again, the outfit and paint apps are pretty poor.
Nosferatu's sculpt is also very good IMHO, but the suit pretty much sucks.
The Creature is perfect IMHO.
The Mask of the Red Death is pretty much perfect as well, although certain details in the outfit could be better.
And so on and so forth.
Again, to me it is a matter of being able to make them better. If it can be done, then why not?
The market will decide what price people would be willing to pay.
Having said that, I doubt HT would ever go into such a line. They've always struck me as a more modern oriented company. Classics for them are the 80's. Which is also fine by me.
Enter your email address to join: