genghisjon
Freaked Out
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2016
- Messages
- 146
- Reaction score
- 1
You really got to hand it to Sideshow - quibbles aside, and also in the context of some pretty awful SSC 1/6 scale figures in the past few years, they have done a pretty great job (twice) on a character that Hasbro, Gentle Giant and others struggled to nail for twenty years...
![]()
I understand the struggle to make the old one seem adequate, but look at this... this is a huge upgrade.
...the size difference in itself is really important.
Almost as much of a struggle to make the new one seem worth nearly a THOUSAND DOLLARS?Believe me, I understand.
I'm waiting until these are in stock in a wider sense - ebay, multiple retailers, then see what discounts I can get. I plan to keep my old Jabba though. I really don't understand the derision - with a repaint it's ROTJ Jabba. I just don't think I can land that repaint however.
Just something I noticed in your video and with this pic..but have you tried the standard look? Basically just like the Jabba picture above your setup; with the regular eye on the left and "sleepy" eye on right. I really think that helps basically eliminate the whole cartoon/caricature look. Either that look or both eyes barely opened.
Yes! I absolutely agree. Owning the original since it came out and this one should be shipping to me in another week..so no biasedness here. Like I was saying, I think the use of that medium opened right eye throws the likeness a bit off; but you have so many options with this piece.Honestly I don't get these "cartoon", "caricature", or "old jabba is more accurate" comments. This new Jabba is light years ahead of the old one. Is it perfect, no. But it's a massive improvement.
Yes it’s a nice sculpt. Just undersized and not pronounced enough.
No toys are worth that much money really, but I think that’s the main reason for not getting the new one. Not the sliiiightly too big hands ;-)
Eh, the open/flat hands are about 50% oversized.
And then there's the mouth seams (and eye seams too under certain lighting,) the totally unusable "tongue mouth" (bad sculpt, bad paint,) the ultra-fragile Salacious (unacceptable) that should have been an articulated plastic figure with actual fur not sculpted again, the too-thick limbs on Salacious, the slightly caricatured Jabba face sculpt that even icruise mentioned (especially noticeable with the wide-open eyes and/or open mouth in place,) the squished lower torso (upper torso is sunken too far down "into" the belly - that's what gives it a slight Hasbro Jabba vibe,) the overdone/too-textured belly and arm sculpts, the straight-tail-only aspect, the statue/resin paint sheen issue, even (maybe) the swap-out parts statue vs articulated arms/waist/PERS eyes plastic figure it could have been...
I think if this was a quintessential Jabba, the ROTJ Jabba puppet shrunken down to 1/6, I'd have less issues with $800-900. And if it was $600, I'd be more forgiving of the figure's shortcomings. But short of HT doing Jabba, this will be the last 1/6 Jabba in a long time, so I don't want to miss out, and obviously the pluses far outweigh the negatives - starting with that gorgeous paint app.
And I'm still not convinced about the scale thing on the old one - it's maybe 1/2" too short, but that's pretty easily fixable, and it looks fine scale-wise next to other 1/6 Palace figs. It seems odd no one brought ever up the scale before Sideshow did in their new Jabba promo video. The new one is quite a bit bigger volume-wise, but a lot of that is in areas you can't see - behind the head and down the back (where it's way bigger than the old fig, but you can't see it - look at the side-by-side pics.)
Let's not sugar-coat this - this new Jabba is a sizable step up on the old one in many ways, but it has issues. Yes, I still think the basic likeness and "attitude"/expression on the old one captures the ROTJ puppet better (icruise and a few others have stated the same thing) - hidden by terrible factory paint like many SSC releases - but the new one is close in that regard and obviously makes for a much more complete Jabba package.
The thing is, I'm straddling both sides of this debate - while I'm getting the new one, I can't help but see a few pluses on the old one that I like better and think I'll keep it (I think at least.) And yes, maybe I'm venting that so many niggling issues are present in a fig I have to pay $800-900 for. For that price, I wanted a home run, and this is more a three base hit - so forgive the rant.![]()
...to me it doesn’t seem like you’re straddling both sides to be honest. Besides the absolutely obvious like the paint job. But you see what you see![]()
Why? Because I had to step in forcefully on one side (and list faults that I and others see) in order to answer someone who's being one-sided? As well as really liking the new one, I see a couple pluses in the old one and some downsides in the new one. That's okay to discuss here, isn't it?
This is a $800-900 figure, and comparisons with the old Jabba are inevitable (and welcome) - just let the discussion play out without the buyers-protecting-turf jackboots.
Ok ok... didn’t want to piss you off. A noble mission you’re on.