It's a hard pill to swallow, especially when you already have the first version. In all seriousness, it's okay to not get this one. I seriously would've been totally fine with my 1.0 if I wasn't such a hardcore Jabba fan.....gotta collect 'em all and all that....to me it doesn’t seem like you’re straddling both sides to be honest. Besides the absolutely obvious like the paint job. But you see what you see
I thought the exact same thing with using the nearly closed eye on the right side - a bit too closed. Even though there's scenes were Jabba looks like that, it would've been nice to have gotten an inbetween eye set.The first thing I tried was the "sleeping" eye on the left and the regular one on the right, but I thought it looked a little off -- like the sleeping eye is a bit too closed. But the nice thing about this figure is that you can mess around with things like this. I might actually go back to using both of the normal eyes.
Beautiful. That's how I plan on doing mine..with the eyes and mouth at least. Not sure if I'm going to have them holding their chalice, pipe, frog or nothing at all.I like the lazy eye look myself, paired with the slightly open mouth and one raised arm- he looks pretty good.
View attachment 442529
Yes, that's what I've been saying for years. Jabba doesn't look like the height of an average American guy. Definitely more in the 5' 6" range as opposed to what they're listed at. I've never seen Vader as some 7' guy, but when seeing an R2 unit in person..it's definitely bigger than I would've imaged.The Jabba puppet's less than 5'-6" tall to the very top of the head.
The other issue is, while the new one is easily 50% more volume than the old one,
The oversized new Jabba arms/hands also makes the figure read larger at a glance - but those new hands are 50% too large.
..how the eye on our left droops noticeably. You can see that even though his eyes are very expressive, onscreen Jabba's eyes are dead straight in relation to each other. I was wondering if you can rotate the Sideshow eye on our left upward so its more level but I don't think it's possible.
You can see the issue here in agp's comp pics - where the screen Jabba's eyes are dead straight in relation to each other, whereas you can see the SSC fig has the drooped eye on the left side.
It's because asterix's were being strategically placed for no reason. Can't get the damn things to go away..glitches in the matrix and all.And like that, Chalor's posts ... disappear.
[/IMG]
C'mon man, we can all get along..right? We're a tiny microcosm community here. Gotta maintain the brethren..especially since most of the people actually around us don't get this maddening obsession we're all appart of. We're like the cyber Loosers' Club here.You are kind of amazing sometimes. First you say no one said anything. Then when I chime in, you suggest I was wrong... about something that has since been proven correct no less. What is the point of your response to me except to be an *** and say I'm incorrect is my assessment somehow because I couldn't know that, didn't have the right tools, or was somehow emotional?
You know, people don't always need calipers to make an accurate call, Talibane.
You are kind of amazing sometimes. First you say no one said anything. Then when I chime in, you suggest I was wrong... about something that has since been proven correct no less. What is the point of your response to me except to be an *** and say I'm incorrect is my assessment somehow because I couldn't know that, didn't have the right tools, or was somehow emotional?
Yes, I knew SS Jabba was under scale just by looking at pictures, same thing we all do to this day. For the record, I always knew Vader 14" was too tall also, that always bothered me, I know you remember that.
Oh, Talibane and I have gone at it much worse than that. I like him, and know I can be just has much a hardass, but that doesn't mean I won't call someone out when they're challenging me. Again, I think it was unfair of him to suggest my belief that Jabba was underscaled was somehow incorrect because my methods were crude or simply too 'feely' to be accurate.
But don't you worry, I'm certain he's piecing together a lengthy retribution against my comment right now.
I wasn't meaning to come across as an ***,
This debate has to happen, even though I know it comes across to some as "haters vs defenders," just as it does in thread after thread over the years. As jackboots and missions.
I posted these pics in the old Jabba thread but I'll post them here as well since this argument continues despite pretty damning proof that old Jabba is significantly too short. Not my photos, I think genghis took them.
One photo shows that on the same level surface the new one is a good bit taller than the old. The next two show that if anything the new version may still be slightly too short next to Boba Fett, meaning the old Jabba is definitely and significantly too short.
Sent from my LG-US996 using Tapatalk
I think the new size is better but isn’t Fett a step down in that screen shot? Yet the height difference looks similar to your shot where they’re on the same plane.
pretty damning proof that old Jabba is significantly too short. Not my photos, I think genghis took them.
Yep. This was going to be my next pic to repost. I thought this was pretty clear in showing the difference without excuses of distortion or anything else.
Enter your email address to join: