piccolodaimaoh
Super Freak
Other than the body being a little skinny (and I stress a little skinny, he's not as skinny as Chris Reeve), exactly what about this figure is not comic-based? The outfit is clearly comic-based. So is the headsculpt. So are the colors used. The style of belt and boots and cape. The Emblem. I think everyone can agree that they would have preferred him bulkier, but to suggest that it's not comic-style, or only bares "just a passing familiarity" is ridiculous.
And I'll say it again. EVERY iteration of Superman in the comics is an "interpretation". It's that particular artist's interpretation. That's why everyone draws him slightly different. Not all comic versions of Superman were gigantic. Same can be said for Batman...
If this is a comic based figure, which I contend it is not, then tell me what comic is it based on? Yes all comic artists have their own interpretation of a character so tell me what comic artist did they use for their interpretation?
Me saying this is SSC's interpretation is a response to people saying this does not look like a comic based Superman. I do not believe this is a comic based Supes. If it is what about it says "comic?" For example if it was based on Neal Adams work then I would expect it to have a set of Kryptonite chains for him to break or a battle damaged head for his boxing match with Muhammad Ali. This looks like a generic Superman that is based on the idea of the character. If you are gonna hide behind the comic shield you'd better be ready to defend yourself with examples when someone questions your design choices. Saying this is how we view Superman only confirms my hypothesis. Man do I want an Ed McGuinness Superman.