Star Trek Figures -- Playmates, Diamond Select, Etc.

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I unfortunately don't have any Eaglemoss Starships MwNN, so I can't tell you anything about them.
I'm curious about them as well.

Hey Guys.......

Eaglemoss ships do not come out until August.

They were originally due out in February, but they ran into issues with the factory being closed down. They now have a new facility & that is why they were pushed back.

They released the first 5 or so last year in the UK in a limited test market to see what kind of response they would get. Demand was strong enough to produce the line & they will be starting off with the same 5 ships as before. Believe there will be around 75 total ships.

Here is the list:

01 USS Enterprise-D
02 USS Enterprise (refit)
03 Klingon Bird-of-Prey
04 Enterprise NX-01
05 Romulan Warbird
06 USS Voyager
07 K't'inga-class
08 USS Excelsior
09 USS Defiant
10 Borg sphere
11 Miranda class
12 Ferengi Marauder
13 Akira class
14 Vor'cha class
15 Prometheus class
16 Valdore type
17 USS Equinox
18 Bajoran Solar Sailer
19 USS Enterprise-E
20 Xindi-Insectoid starship
21 Raptor class
22 Jem'Hadar fighter
23 Nebula class
24 Suurok class
25 Delta Flyer
26 Breen warship
27 Krenim weapon ship
28 USS Enterprise-C
29 Galor class
30 USS Stargazer
31 Borg Queen's vessel
32 Jem'Hadar battle cruiser
33 Maquis fighter
34 Romulan Bird-of-Prey (23rd century)
35 Hirogen warship
36 T'Plana-Hath (starship)
37 Prototype Klingon Bird-of-Prey
38 USS Enterprise-J
39 Son'a Command ship
40 Runabout
41 D-5 class
42 Romulan drone-ship
43 USS Enterprise-B
44 Jem'Hadar battleship
45 Malon export vessel
46 Federation mission scoutship
47 Scimitar
48 USS Relativity
49 Tholian starship (22nd century)
50 Goroth's starship
51 USS Kelvin
52 Son'a collector
53 Xindi-Reptilian starship
54 Oberth class
55 Suliban cell ship
56 Phoenix
57 Fesarius
58 Steamrunner class
59 Xindi-Aquatic cruiser
60 Vulcan Long range shuttle
61 Saber class
62 Hideki class
63 USS Enterprise-A
64 Romulan Bird-of-Prey (22nd century)
65 Dauntless class
66 Federation holoship
67 Scorpion class
68 Norway class
69 USS Enterprise
70 Species 8472 bioship

NO NUMBERS
Borg probe
Cousteau (yacht)
Borg cube
Galileo

SPECIALS
Deep Space 9
USS Enterprise (alternate reality)
Future USS Enterprise-D from "All Good Things..."
Space Stations
 
I unfortunately don't have any Eaglemoss Starships MwNN, so I can't tell you anything about them.
I'm curious about them as well.

Okay, sorry, I thought you had a few of them.

Hey Guys.......

Eaglemoss ships do not come out until August.

They were originally due out in February, but they ran into issues with the factory being closed down. They now have a new facility & that is why they were pushed back.

They released the first 5 or so last year in the UK in a limited test market to see what kind of response they would get. Demand was strong enough to produce the line & they will be starting off with the same 5 ships as before. Believe there will be around 75 total ships.

Thanks for the info soxpicks. Will they be available in the US?

And Welcome aboard!
 
Last edited:
Okay, sorry, I thought you had a few of them.
Thanks for the info soxpicks. Will they be available in the US?

And Welcome aboard!

I have been badgering them about the US release since I first spied them so long ago during the UK test. :)

They ARE planning on trying to get them to us. I know BBTS is interested in carrying them, but what I really am hoping for is a subscription being offered here. I want the exclusives!
 
Mattel has the license to do ships.
Would they have the exclusive rights for the US and not allow Eaglemoss to sell theirs here?
I hope that not the case!

What is the best version to buy of the Enterprise from Into Darkness?

Do you want a diecast ship or model kit?

Revell Germany is releasing a JJ Enterprise. I don't know if it will be available in the states. From the pix it looks pretty nice, paint job aside.
I have to say the design has grown on me since it's premiere. I didn't care for it at first.
 
Mattel has the license to do ships.
Would they have the exclusive rights for the US and not allow Eaglemoss to sell theirs here?
I hope that not the case!



Do you want a diecast ship or model kit?

Revell Germany is releasing a JJ Enterprise. I don't know if it will be available in the states. From the pix it looks pretty nice, paint job aside.
I have to say the design has grown on me since it's premiere. I didn't care for it at first.

I have a strong feeling that Mattel's license is the reason why the Eaglemoss ships can't come over here, but nothing concrete on why they won't sell them in the US/Canada. BBTS carries a lot of Eaglemoss releases so there shouldn't be anything stopping them other then license exclusivity.

I agree, the Revell model is the best looking one out there. The electronic Playmates Abrams Enterprise isn't very good. It's undersized compared to the other Art Asylum starships, and very poorly painted, I'd avoid it unless you can get one very cheap, like $15, (I've seen it sell for that much). Then there's the Hot Wheels 1/50 Abrams Ent., I don't own one but it looks pretty good for what you pay for it ($15). This one might get a re-release with the new movie and I've heard that the new releases will have more diecast in them so I'd wait and see.
But if you want affordable quality, I'd go with the Revell model kit.


And welcome to the Freaks Soxpicks!
:welcome1:
 
I actually wanted the light up one. Why in the world haven't they re-released it for the new film?
 
I actually wanted the light up one. Why in the world haven't they re-released it for the new film?

This is a pretty good look at it:
https://trekmovie.com/2009/04/16/pl...w-of-new-star-trek-uss-enteprise-vehicle-toy/

Hasbro now has the license for Star Trek toys outside of Mattel's HW stuff. Playmates made the 2009 electronic ship so that's why there's no re-release. Hasbro was going to do 3.3/4" figures like their Star Wars toys but decided not to I guess.
 
This is an interesting article concerning New Star Trek Merchandise:

https://movies.yahoo.com/news/battle-over-star-trek-rights-killed-j-j-024108752.html

A struggle over the U.S.S. Enterprise's past and future helped sour J.J. Abrams on the "Star Trek" franchise and may have contributed to his decision to take on the "Star Wars" universe.

Competing ambitions between Paramount, CBS and Abrams' production company Bad Robot over merchandising surrounding the first film in the rebooted "Star Trek" franchise led the director to curtail plans to turn the series into a multi-platform experience that spanned television, digital entertainment and comic books, according to an individual with knowledge of the dispute.

"J.J. just threw up his hands," the individual told TheWrap. "The message was, 'Why set up all this when we'll just be competing against ourselves?' The studio wanted to please Bad Robot, but it was allowing CBS to say yay or nay when it came to what was happening with the 'Star Trek' products."

"Star Trek Into Darkness" arrives in U.S. multiplexes Thursday with tie-ins ranging from Bing to Hasbro. It is expected to gross more than $100 million at the domestic box office over the extended weekend.

Yet this marketing assault pales compared to the one that Abrams (above) and Bad Robot once envisioned for "Star Trek" and now plan to construct around the new "Star Wars" films.

A major stumbling block: "Star Trek's" licensing and merchandising rights are spread over two media conglomerates with competing goals. The rights to the original television series from the 1960s remained with CBS after it split off from Paramount's corporate parent Viacom in 2006, while the studio retained the rights to the film series. CBS also held onto the ability to create future "Star Trek" TV shows.

Paramount must license the "Star Trek" characters from CBS Consumer Products for film merchandising.

Much to the dismay of Bad Robot, CBS' merchandising arm continued to create memorabilia and products based on the cast of the original 1960s series and market them to Trekkies. The production company did market research and found that there was brand confusion between Abrams' rebooted Enterprise crew and the one starring William Shatner and DeForest Kelley.

TheWrap has learned that Bad Robot asked CBS to stop making products featuring the original cast, but talks broke down over money. The network was making roughly $20 million a year on that merchandise and had no incentive to play nice with its former corporate brother, the individual said. In response, the company scaled back its ambitions to have "Star Trek's" storylines play out with television shows, spin-off films and online components, something Abrams had been eager to accomplish.

Paramount declined to comment for this article and a spokesperson for Bad Robot did not respond to a request to comment.

"As the merchandising rights holder for Star Trek, CBS Consumer Products has ongoing relationships with all our partners, including Paramount," a spokesman for CBS Consumer Products said in a statement. "We have worked closely with them for the last five years to create merchandise to enhance the movies and satisfy fans. We are all looking forward to a successful opening of 'Into Darkness.'"

Despite the initial bumpy ride, it appears that Paramount, Bad Robot and CBS Consumer Products worked more harmoniously on "Star Trek Into Darkness." The parties collaborated on a Star Trek video game (left) that will feature the voices of the film's stars Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto; a graphic novel prequel to the film that was overseen by screenwriter Roberto Orci; and a novelization from Simon & Schuster (below).

Still, Jeff Gomez, CEO of the transmedia consulting firm Starlight Runner Entertainment, says there could have been so many more lucrative tie-ins. He contends that the rebooted franchise has enormous potential outside the multiplex.

"Right now the 'Star Trek' movies are movies," Gomez said. "There is no apparent ongoing transmedia strategy behind them, just a handful of licensing opportunities around the release of 'Into Darkness.'

"Why would that be attractive to an artist who sees beyond the boundaries of the silver screen to envision a true multi-platform narrative all based on a global franchise?"

Abrams' ambitions to create a multi-platform film franchise will find a more natural home at Disney, analysts and industry experts tell TheWrap. As successful as "Star Trek" has been, few franchises match the profitability and cultural prominence of George Lucas' space opera, which would be difficult for any director to pass up.

"Disney has always been oriented to multi-platform revenue stream situations," Seth Willenson, a film library valuations expert, told TheWrap.

Moreover, Willenson notes that Abrams, who has a deal that is believed to include creative and profit participation in "Star Wars" inspired merchandise and spin-offs, will have more control in shaping the legacy of the Skywalker clan than he would have had with developing side projects for the "Star Trek" crew. Unlike with "Star Trek," with its rights split between Paramount and CBS, Disney owns the rights to "Star Wars" outright thanks to its $4 billion purchase of Lucasfilm last year.

"The derivative rights situation on 'Star Trek' is complicated because you're dealing with cross-company cultures, so it makes it harder to implement a grand plan," Willenson said.

As for Disney's grand "Star Wars" plan, it's sounding an awful lot like the one Abrams once envisioned for "Star Trek." There will be television properties, theme park rides and spin-off films all centered around the new trilogy that Abrams will oversee.

It's a page borrowed from Disney's exploitation of the Marvel comic books and if it works out, it should make Abrams very rich indeed.

Interesting that Bad Robot felt there was confusion over old and new Trek from market research, so they asked CBS to stop making merchandise from the prime universe. I'm glad they didn't get their way.
 
I have a strong feeling that Mattel's license is the reason why the Eaglemoss ships can't come over here, but nothing concrete on why they won't sell them in the US/Canada. BBTS carries a lot of Eaglemoss releases so there shouldn't be anything stopping them other then license exclusivity.

Where have you heard they can't sell them? Last I heard (from Eaglemoss) they were still trying to make it happen, and it seemed it wasn't that they couldn't sell them but that they are a non-US company without established distribution in place at the moment.

In fact, on May 9 they posted on Facebook (in response to someone else asking about US subscriptions):
Star Trek Starships: "Hi Mike, We will have some good news for you in the next couple of weeks."

So I wouldn't worry too much, yet.
 
Tray shots of the newest line of figures:

4SaIpZD.jpg


Great shot by DST and Mini-Myte at the Minimate Multiverse:

m2xbeAY.jpg
 
Back
Top