I will take the ST over a lot of that....not all of it, but a lot of it.
Well, now... let's be reasonable...

I will take the ST over a lot of that....not all of it, but a lot of it.
Have you actually watched any of that garbage? Its SO BAD.Well, now... let's be reasonable...![]()
Personally I don't believe Lucas is very invested in it anymore. He was on the set of the Mandalorian to witness first hand how technology has finally caught up with his vision for the garage sized blockbuster factory (The "Volume"). He also had his picture taken with Grogu backstage and, if rumors are to be believed, even challenged him to a friendly game of Dejarik. So I guess it's fair to assume they've finally buried the hatchet...So was it in Lucas' sale contract to never talk about or critique any of the material created by Disney?
And if so, does that have a non-disclosure type expiration date?
I would love to hear his actual opinion on what Disney has put out there. Or am I just missing, not seeing all the interviews/articles where he does talk about it (good or bad) ? Any links?
I know he publicly stated he had made some kind of peace with letting it all go. yet he's got to have an opinion on where they've steered the mythology and franchise.
Or is it a case of; if you can't say something nice, ...?
Makes Attack of the clones look like Citizen Kane...Have you actually watched any of that garbage? Its SO BAD.
View attachment 762169
View attachment 762170
I HIGHLY recommend watching it , for some perspective on Lucas and what he thinks SW is
LOL ... pretty sure he has. I remember them. The Ewok Adventure came out in 1984 when I was still a child and I was excited to see *anything* Star Wars related. I tuned in and enjoyed seeing that fantasy world brought back to life, but was also, if I'm remembering correctly ... frustrated that it wasn't really "Star Wars". The special TV event came and went, and I got on with being a kid. This was decades before things like Internet or bored, nostalgic adulthood would drive me to discuss this stuff ad nauseam from behind a keyboard.Have you actually watched any of that garbage? Its SO BAD.
You're not wrong. I don't think Lucas has ever had a firm handle on what it is. Star Wars was edited into success by his wife, ESB was directed into greatness by Irvin Kershner, and ROTJ rode on those coattails but the cracks had begun to show and ... we all know what happened next.View attachment 762169
View attachment 762170
I HIGHLY recommend watching it , for some perspective on Lucas and what he thinks SW is
If it wasn't for the Internet and my sojourn into collecting a decade ago, all Star Wars would be for me would be some tired old quotes to whip out like a dad-joke from time to time, in the wake of a disappointing PT.I have. In its day too. It was so bad, Star Wars became pretty 'uncool' for a period in the late 80's-early 90's (for everyone I knew)... until the announcement of the Prequels and the new Hasbro "He-Man" line of figures.
Don't blame Luke, Dak said he felt like he could take on the entire Empire himself and Luke gave him his chance. No takes-backsies about suddenly relying on approach vectors, lol.So when he was telling Luke "I have no approach vector, I'm not set!"
... let's say T-47s don't have vectored thrust, so he wasn't warning of engine malfunction, but saying he didn't have a heading which he was presumably expecting from some kind of tactical hub back at base directing the fighters.
Luke's ******* response is "Steady Dak!" followed by the decision to fly directly into the AT-AT group's cannon fire, instead of exploiting their limited firing arc via his squadron's superior speed and agility, resulting in immediate casualties. Luke, you stupid hick.
According to Bob Iger's tell-all book they originally had a "do not disparage" clause in the contact of the sale but George refused to sign it. Bob said that George verbally reassured him that he wouldn't go off about the new movies though because he apparently owns a ton of Disney stock. So the movies tanking would literally cost George money.So was it in Lucas' sale contract to never talk about or critique any of the material created by Disney?
And if so, does that have a non-disclosure type expiration date?
I would love to hear his actual opinion on what Disney has put out there. Or am I just missing, not seeing all the interviews/articles where he does talk about it (good or bad) ? Any links?
Glad to see someone remembers that!I have. In its day too. It was so bad, Star Wars became pretty 'uncool' for a period in the late 80's-early 90's (for everyone I knew)... until the announcement of the Prequels and the new Hasbro "He-Man" line of figures.
Glad to see someone remembers that!
Then again, I picked up the Kenner Shuttle , B wing , Y wing , Yak Face with coin and just about every figure for bargin basement prices.
I still remember I got the shuttle for 16.99, along the back wall on clearance, and the B-wing was 12.99.
They stayed in the box till I sold them shortly before the ST for a bundle .....
Glass houses kinda comments to me.According to Bob Iger's tell-all book they originally had a "do not disparage" clause in the contact of the sale but George refused to sign it. Bob said that George verbally reassured him that he wouldn't go off about the new movies though because he apparently owns a ton of Disney stock. So the movies tanking would literally cost George money.
That still hasn't stopped him from letting his sentiments be known through the Charlie Rose interview and other online videos. He always seems to draw a clear distinction between "my six films" and the Disney stuff. He *never* just refers to it as "the Saga" or "the story" anymore.
Yeah, it's easy for us to wish that George had never handed things over to Disney but based on his post-ESB track record what evidence do we really have that he would have made anything coming even remotely close to the quality of Rogue One. Or seasons 1 and 2 of Mando. Many would include Andor as well.Glass houses kinda comments to me.
Shark Park
S H A R K
Sharks of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Shark
Sharkenstein
Ok, thanks! That is interesting to know there was a clause, and he wouldn't sign it.According to Bob Iger's tell-all book they originally had a "do not disparage" clause in the contact of the sale but George refused to sign it. Bob said that George verbally reassured him that he wouldn't go off about the new movies though because he apparently owns a ton of Disney stock. So the movies tanking would literally cost George money.
Yeah the 2015 Charlie Rose interview is where I was referencing he'd made some kind of peace with letting it all go.That still hasn't stopped him from letting his sentiments be known through the Charlie Rose interview and other online videos. He always seems to draw a clear distinction between "my six films" and the Disney stuff. He *never* just refers to it as "the Saga" or "the story" anymore.
It's the only thing I heard him say, yet was curious if there was anything since?I know he publicly stated he had made some kind of peace with letting it all go.
In this 2023 video meeting George did with some high schoolers he made sure they all understood that Disney has gone down a road he never intended and that the current Saga is very much apart from the six films that he created. He obviously considers his story to be timeless compared to the modern identity politics so prevalent in the new canon..
Ok, thanks! That is interesting to know there was a clause, and he wouldn't sign it.
Yet as you indicate, makes sense, he wouldn't disparage any of it, as he's still monetrilly invested.
Yeah the 2015 Charlie Rose interview is where I was referencing he'd made some kind of peace with letting it all go.
It's the only thing I heard him say, yet was curious if there was anything since?
I guess not (unless there are any forthcoming links? Interviews?
Not likely, If as he implies in that interview, for his own sanity he doesn't follow any of it.
Which is to bad, cause I would love to hear his thoughts on it, where the "mythology" has differed on what he imagined.
And mostly his thoughts on Andor, Gilroy's more adult methodical take, if that's something he'd even enjoy?