That’s sort of my point....maybe it was not suppose to be disguised?
I mean it is a new SW lead by a female producer who is vocal about women’s rights?
Disney has been trying for many years to be inclusive of as many cultures and religions as possible. Which is in their financial interest to do so. As a stock holder , I agree with that call.
What people are pushing against is they want SW to remand the same, and not be a female lead with amazing powers. Has Rey been Ryan I doubt the complaining would have been as loud. Especially the agenda word, which makes me ill every time someone says it...
Had Anakin been Annakin, I am quite sure the same arguments would have been waged.
Fact is many people spit out the word Agenda to make it seem like a vast conspiracy is afoot to change their beliefs or corrupt their children or something....it’s real tin foil hat stuff....persecution complex....
Female producer makes female strong film? Well yeah?!??
I think it would be better for people to drop the code words as flat out say they do not like female leads or many changes to the OT they grew up with.
The whole argument of Rey not being trained, too powerful , etc etc is the real code words for some folks who just do not want to see a female character out perform the male hero’s of their youth without justifiable cause.....
But why not?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Again, back to the idea that if people have issues with female character portrayals, they are automatically sexist even if they don't want to admit it.
Even if they have perfectly valid points to make, still sexist. I'll let my girlfriend (who's kinda SJW actually) know.
I am vegan. I had issues with the animal rights messages in this movie. Does that make me not vegan? Do I need to pay more attention to what I eat because I'm actually eating meat every day without noticing? ****ing ridiculous.