SuperHotties - No matter who loses, WE WIN!!!!

[Boba Ben]

who is that?

It's the girl from True Blood.

 

[DreaAlGhul]

My b... detector is going off. She is nice looking and sexy, but she looks a little conceited, shallow, materialistic, competitive and a b....
Are those even real?

I would take Alexis Texas or Natalia Cruz in her prime over her any day.

Is that a real question?

 

[Blackthornone]

Why anyone would want to watch a woman gag on stranger's cocks for a career and then want his chance in the long line is beyond me.

That isn't the point. The point is that they are more beautiful and you can see them. Furthermore, you can see them entirely, so you can accurately assess the quality of the goods as opposed to being misled by push up bras. There was also a time before these women got into porn, too. By the way, what makes you think that real actresses DON'T gag on stranger's cocks?

There are lots of even more beautiful women who aren't interested in porn, or acting, or Playboy, or modeling or any of that, but you rarely see them unless it's in person or a photo of someone's friend.

 

[Blackthornone]

Is that a real question?

I was curious as to whether they were. If they're not real, they're not woman. If you are going to get into plastic surgery, you might as well sculpt a woman out of clay and it would be just as valid a representation of real female beauty. Plus, the sculpture won't age, so it has that going for it. True human beauty is natural.

 

[crows]

The Ultimate Warrior.

*******.

THE GIRL MORON!!!

 

[crows]

It's the girl from True Blood.

thank you

 

[nemesisenforcer]

These are some good choices! I picked Blake Lively!

 

[DreaAlGhul]

I was curious as to whether they were. If they're not real, they're not woman. If you are going to get into plastic surgery, you might as well sculpt a woman out of clay and it would be just as valid a representation of real female beauty. Plus, the sculpture won't age, so it has that going for it. True human beauty is natural.

Having breast implants doesn't make some one any less of a woman. A woman can do whatever she wants with her body, whether it's breast implants, lip fillers, etc. She is still just as much of a woman as the lady who rocks her A cup breasts.

Plus, plastic surgery fades & ages just like real body parts do. Fillers don't last, just like collagen. Implants lose their shape, just like real breasts do.

Granted there's some bad plastic surgery out there, but then you have woman like Scarlet Johanson, Natalie Portman (nose jobs) & Blake Livley (breast implants + nose job) who look beautiful without going over the top. Are you really going to try to say they're less 'of a woman' because they did something to their appearance??

 

[Project_A]

 

[crows]

That isn't the point. The point is that they are more beautiful and you can see them. Furthermore, you can see them entirely, so you can accurately assess the quality of the goods as opposed to being misled by push up bras. There was also a time before these women got into porn, too. By the way, what makes you think that real actresses DON'T gag on stranger's cocks?

There are lots of even more beautiful women who aren't interested in porn, or acting, or Playboy, or modeling or any of that, but you rarely see them unless it's in person or a photo of someone's friend.

Having breast implants doesn't make some one any less of a woman. A woman can do whatever she wants with her body, whether it's breast implants, lip fillers, etc. She is still just as much of a woman as the lady who rocks her A cup breasts.




Plus, plastic surgery fades & ages just like real body parts do. Fillers don't last, just like collagen. Implants lose their shape, just like real breasts do.




Granted there's some bad plastic surgery out there, but then you have woman like Scarlet Johanson, Natalie Portman (nose jobs) & Blake Livley (breast implants + nose job) who look beautiful without going over the top. Are you really going to try to say they're less 'of a woman' because they did something to their appearance??

like this:

I kinda wish I could date a girl with implants, really curious, wish I could meet one, but I never even see girls with implants around, I mean, maybe If I go to Miami, but i dont know.

 

[Project_A]

 

[King Darkness]

THE GIRL MORON!!!

Yeah I know

 

[crows]

 

[Blackthornone]

Having breast implants doesn't make some one any less of a woman. A woman can do whatever she wants with her body, whether it's breast implants, lip fillers, etc. She is still just as much of a woman as the lady who rocks her A cup breasts.

Plus, plastic surgery fades & ages just like real body parts do. Fillers don't last, just like collagen. Implants lose their shape, just like real breasts do.

Granted there's some bad plastic surgery out there, but then you have woman like Scarlet Johanson, Natalie Portman (who've had nose jobs) & Blake Livley (who has breast implants) who look beautiful without going over the top. Are you really going to try to say they're less 'of a woman' because they did something to their apprerance??

The CONCISE definition of a woman or a man or a bear or a dolphin is how nature created it to be, and not how a scalpel altered it to be.

Since we are talking about a woman's appearance, my argument is valid. Are they beautiful? Sure. That's what plastic surgery is usually for, to make people beautiful, but an inanimate sculpture is beautiful too, though it isn't human. I am talking about true human beauty, and not their personality or how they mate or whatever. It's a body. In my opinion, the soul is the person and not the body. The body is just a vehicle, like a car is to a driver, the soul. Furthermore, if plastic surgery is done, is that body still physically THEM, as in an accurate representation of them as they developed, or is it to some degree also a representation of the surgeon's skill, which reduces the amount that one's physical appearance reflects oneself?


A person is still the same person whether surgery or not but since humans are natural organisms, if the body isn't all natural, it cannot logically be an authentic representation of humanity, especially that individual's humanity, even if the parts are all human.
However, implants are made of silicone, and no human is born with or develops silicone body parts as far as I know. Not natural parts= not human parts.

Logically, since dental fillings aren't natural, they aren't human, either, and so they compromise the truth of the humanity of the body that has them. However, no one usually sees those, and they are not done for the sake of artificial aesthetic enhancement, but for medical necessity.
Does plastic surgery really change your personality? For some it does. If it is an artificial alteration, is it truly them, or an artificial construct or an idea they have in their heads of who they want to be as opposed to how they really are?

Since Scarlett Johannson had a nose job, she isn't really as beautiful a woman as she seems, because part of her outward physical appearance is artificially altered.

I am not talking about plastic surgery making one less valuable as a person. It seems like that is what you are inferring from what I am saying.
Breast implants are no more real breasts and no more human than cubic zirconia are real diamonds.


This reminds me from a quote of Saturday Night Live, Strictly From Blackwell :"I feel it's the fault of Madison Avenue. Not the fault of the woman, Because the woman, she in all her glory, and of course there are millions OF her, wants to look fabulous, and make a wonderful statement about WHO SHE FEELS she wants to be seen AS... As a woman.
Next up, we'll be talking about diet, hair care, and plastic surgery, all of the things that make up what WE call... The wonderful world of you."

 

[crows]

Yeah I know

 

[AIR]

Let me get this thread back on track

 

[crows]

The CONCISE definition of a woman or a man or a bear or a dolphin is how nature created it to be, and not how a scalpel altered it to be.

Since we are talking about a woman's appearance, my argument is valid. Are they beautiful? Sure. That's what plastic surgery is usually for, to make people beautiful, but an inanimate sculpture is beautiful too, though it isn't human. I am talking about true human beauty, and not their personality or how they mate or whatever. It's a body. In my opinion, the soul is the person and not the body. The body is just a vehicle, like a car is to a driver, the soul. Furthermore, if plastic surgery is done, is that body still physically THEM, as in an accurate representation of them as they developed, or is it to some degree also a representation of the surgeon's skill, which reduces the amount that one's physical appearance reflects oneself?


A person is still the same person whether surgery or not but since humans are natural organisms, if the body isn't all natural, it cannot logically be an authentic representation of humanity, especially that individual's humanity, even if the parts are all human.
However, implants are made of silicone, and no human is born with or develops silicone body parts as far as I know. Not natural parts= not human parts.

Logically, since dental fillings aren't natural, they aren't human, either, and so they compromise the truth of the humanity of the body that has them. However, no one usually sees those, and they are not done for the sake of artificial aesthetic enhancement, but for medical necessity.
Does plastic surgery really change your personality? For some it does. If it is an artificial alteration, is it truly them, or an artificial construct or an idea they have in their heads of who they want to be as opposed to how they really are?

Since Scarlett Johannson had a nose job, she isn't really as beautiful a woman as she seems, because part of her outward physical appearance is artificially altered.


Breast implants are no more real breasts and no more human than cubic zirconia are real diamonds.

so you want organic women?

let me as you something bro, if your tooth chips, you are going to let it rot then?
because you cannot put something that is fake into your body,

I guess you would be against wearing glasses, since humans were not born with them, or what about clothes? or shoes, if you say you wear clothes or shoes you are crazy,

(YES I know Thats different, the implants go inside the body)
but then, like I said about the tooth,

 

[Blackthornone]

so you want organic women?

let me as you something bro, if your tooth chips, you are going to let it rot then?
because you cannot put something that is fake into your body,

I guess you would be against wearing glasses, since humans were not born with them, or what about clothes? or shoes, if you say you wear clothes or shoes you are crazy,

(YES I know Thats different, the implants go inside the body)
but then, like I said about the tooth,

I mentioned that dentistry was an exception out of medical necessity.

As far as glasses, I think it is first best to always stop what one is doing, whether reading or gaming or watching TV at the first sign of eyestrain, in order to prevent eye damage. Some people just plow through the eyestrain doing whatever they are doing, as if feeling pain in the eyes doesn't mean ANYTHING.
Also, Ophthalmologist Dr. Deborah Banker said that 8 ounces of fresh extracted carrot juice per day will increase your eyesight by 5 diopters after one year.

That said, glasses aren't plastic surgery, nor are clothes or shoes.
You raise a point though, that people are far too obsessed with fashion as if somehow it actually makes THEM look better. Let the clothes be clean, practical, simple, and follow the contours of the human body and they will look best.

People act like earrings make them pretty? There is nothing more beautiful than the human body and no earring is as beautiful as the human ear, no matter how sparkling the stone or shiny the metal. It's ostentatious.

No matter what the jewelry, it can only reduce the magnificence of the simple elegance of the beauty of the human form. It is genius, and yet, people STILL try to mess with it... The same with all other jewelry and tattoos, for that matter. The color and texture of the human body how it naturally is is the beauty of the mineral, vegetable and animal all rolled into one in a majestic synergy that is more beautiful than the sum of it's parts, and to which no man made thing can compare.

 

[Lejuan]

The CONCISE definition of a woman or a man or a bear or a dolphin is how nature created it to be, and not how a scalpel altered it to be.

Since we are talking about a woman's appearance, my argument is valid. Are they beautiful? Sure. That's what plastic surgery is usually for, to make people beautiful, but an inanimate sculpture is beautiful too, though it isn't human. I am talking about true human beauty, and not their personality or how they mate or whatever. It's a body. In my opinion, the soul is the person and not the body. The body is just a vehicle, like a car is to a driver, the soul. Furthermore, if plastic surgery is done, is that body still physically THEM, as in an accurate representation of them as they developed, or is it to some degree also a representation of the surgeon's skill, which reduces the amount that one's physical appearance reflects oneself?


A person is still the same person whether surgery or not but since humans are natural organisms, if the body isn't all natural, it cannot logically be an authentic representation of humanity, especially that individual's humanity, even if the parts are all human.
However, implants are made of silicone, and no human is born with or develops silicone body parts as far as I know. Not natural parts= not human parts.

Logically, since dental fillings aren't natural, they aren't human, either, and so they compromise the truth of the humanity of the body that has them. However, no one usually sees those, and they are not done for the sake of artificial aesthetic enhancement, but for medical necessity.
Does plastic surgery really change your personality? For some it does. If it is an artificial alteration, is it truly them, or an artificial construct or an idea they have in their heads of who they want to be as opposed to how they really are?

Since Scarlett Johannson had a nose job, she isn't really as beautiful a woman as she seems, because part of her outward physical appearance is artificially altered.

I am not talking about plastic surgery making one less valuable as a person. It seems like that is what you are inferring from what I am saying.
Breast implants are no more real breasts and no more human than cubic zirconia are real diamonds.


This reminds me from a quote of Saturday Night Live, Strictly From Blackwell :"I feel it's the fault of Madison Avenue. Not the fault of the woman, Because the woman, she in all her glory, and of course there are millions OF her, wants to look fabulous, and make a wonderful statement about WHO SHE FEELS she wants to be seen AS... As a woman.
Next up, we'll be talking about diet, hair care, and plastic surgery, all of the things that make up what WE call... The wonderful world of you."

While I am a fan of concise, I would love to hear your expanded definition.

 

[DreaAlGhul]

The CONCISE definition of a woman or a man or a bear or a dolphin is how nature created it to be, and not how a scalpel altered it to be.

Since we are talking about a woman's appearance, my argument is valid. Are they beautiful? Sure. That's what plastic surgery is usually for, to make people beautiful, but an inanimate sculpture is beautiful too, though it isn't human. I am talking about true human beauty, and not their personality or how they mate or whatever. It's a body. In my opinion, the soul is the person and not the body. The body is just a vehicle, like a car is to a driver, the soul. Furthermore, if plastic surgery is done, is that body still physically THEM, as in an accurate representation of them as they developed, or is it to some degree also a representation of the surgeon's skill, which reduces the amount that one's physical appearance reflects oneself?


A person is still the same person whether surgery or not but since humans are natural organisms, if the body isn't all natural, it cannot logically be an authentic representation of humanity, especially that individual's humanity, even if the parts are all human.
However, implants are made of silicone, and no human is born with or develops silicone body parts as far as I know. Not natural parts= not human parts.

Logically, since dental fillings aren't natural, they aren't human, either, and so they compromise the truth of the humanity of the body that has them. However, no one usually sees those, and they are not done for the sake of artificial aesthetic enhancement, but for medical necessity.
Does plastic surgery really change your personality? For some it does. If it is an artificial alteration, is it truly them, or an artificial construct or an idea they have in their heads of who they want to be as opposed to how they really are?

Since Scarlett Johannson had a nose job, she isn't really as beautiful a woman as she seems, because part of her outward physical appearance is artificially altered.

I am not talking about plastic surgery making one less valuable as a person. It seems like that is what you are inferring from what I am saying.
Breast implants are no more real breasts and no more human than cubic zirconia are real diamonds.

But who are you to say what "true human beauty" is. I have body modifications which were not done for any medical reason. No, I was not born with them, but for you to claim that it's not "true human beauty" is ridiculous solely for the fact that it's not something some one has when they're born.


I get it. Fake is fake. Silicone is far from what one has in their body. I get that.

But then you have women who put saline or silicone in their chests but get them inserted under the muscle for a more natural, not-porn-star look. They hang, they sit naturally, they're at a standard size & they'll look real. So because they're not necessarily real, you're saying that it's not a valid representation of what a female body looks like even if millions of women already look like her? That's not fair at all.

You also have to remember those who lose their breasts from cancer. Women usually get implants after breast cancer for aesthetics, it's not medical, it's not necessary, it's just so a woman can feel like herself again. It's sad to think that you'd think she's not a representation of real human beauty just because she may have 350CC's of silicone in her body just so she can feel comfortable again.

Let me guess... you're not a fan of makeup either, are you?