SuperHotties - No matter who loses, WE WIN!!!!

[Lejuan]

Let me guess... you're not a fan of makeup either, are you?

Here we go...

 

[Blackthornone]

But who are you to say what "true human beauty" is. I have body modifications which were not done for any medical reason. No, I was not born with them, but for you to claim that it's not "true human beauty" is ridiculous solely for the fact that it's not something some one has when they're born.


I get it. Fake is fake. Silicone is far from what one has in their body. I get that.

But then you have women who put saline or silicone in their chests but get them inserted under the muscle for a more natural, not-porn-star look. They hang, they sit naturally, they're at a standard size & they'll look real. So because they're not necessarily real, you're saying that it's not a valid representation of what a female body looks like even if millions of women already look like her? That's not fair at all.

You also have to remember those who lose their breasts from cancer. Women usually get implants after breast cancer for aesthetics, it's not medical, it's not necessary, it's just so a woman can feel like herself again. It's sad to think that you'd think she's not a representation of real human beauty just because she may have 350CC's of silicone in her body just so she can feel comfortable again.

Let me guess... you're not a fan of makeup either, are you?

Who am I to say what true human beauty is? I'm not. Only nature or God has the right to do that. A person can change their body how they see fit, but it doesn't make it an accurate representation of humanity. I have heard of under the muscle implants, but again, it isn't original equipment. It is a fair assessment so long as it applies to everyone.
Whether it is fair that one person is more naturally beautiful is fair or not is a different question. I'm saying it isn't a valid representation of what SHE, that individual woman really looks like and who she really is. Lots of things are fair, but unappealing to some. They are still fair assessments so long as they apply equally to all.

I understand the breast loss to cancer issue and how a woman would be motivated to get exact replacements to try to feel more like themselves as they were again. That is an example of RECONSTRUCTIVE surgery, like putting someone together after an accident, which isn't the same as elective plastic surgery.
Incidentally, the bags that breast implants are made of break down into toluene as it is in a human body, constantly releasing a small amount over time. Toluene is carcinogenic.
I read that in a book called How To Prevent Breast Cancer.

As far as make-up, I think it should look as if it has not been applied. The best looking women don't need it anyway. Often it is to make a woman look more beautiful in spite of poor health habits. Fit, healthy women have a natural glow of beauty about them that make-up really can't duplicate, that is more beautiful than make-up can achieve.

To me, Make-up with extreme colors either looks hyper-sexual or weird.
Sometimes I am in the mood for hyper sexual, or If I can see the woman is beautiful anyway, I don't let the make up distract me, but it doesn't really appeal to me.

I'm not against sexy make-up unless it is on children in those beauty pageants with 6 year olds looking like 20 year olds who have no business having sex in the first place, or even looking sexy. To me, sexy make-up isn't appropriate unless you want to get down. It's not authentic or honest and is distracting at best unless sex is intended.



By the way, you don't need any help in the beauty department.

 

[DreaAlGhul]

Who am I to say what true human beauty is? I'm not. Only nature or God has the right to do that. A person can change their body how they see fit, but it doesn't make it an accurate representation of humanity. I have heard of under the muscle implants, but again, it isn't original equipment. It is a fair assessment so long as it applies to everyone.
Whether it is fair that one person is more naturally beautiful is fair or not is a different question. I'm saying it isn't a valid representation of what SHE, that individual woman really looks like and who she really is. Lots of things are fair, but unappealing to some. They are still fair assessments so long as they apply equally to all.

I understand the breast loss to cancer issue and how a woman would be motivated to get exact replacements to try to feel more like themselves as they were again. That is an example of RECONSTRUCTIVE surgery, like putting someone together after an accident, which isn't the same as elective plastic surgery.
Incidentally, the bags that breast implants are made of break down into toluene as it is in a human body, constantly releasing a small amount over time. Toluene is carcinogenic.
I read that in a book called How To Prevent Breast Cancer.

As far as make-up, I think it should look as if it has not been applied. The best looking women don't need it anyway. Often it is to make a woman look more beautiful in spite of poor health habits. Fit, healthy women have a natural glow of beauty about them that make-up really can't duplicate, that is more beautiful than make-up can achieve.

To me, Make-up with extreme colors either looks hyper-sexual or weird.
Sometimes I am in the mood for hyper sexual, or If I can see the woman is beautiful anyway, I don't let the make up distract me, but it doesn't really appeal to me.

I'm not against sexy make-up unless it is on children in those beauty pageants with 6 year olds looking like 20 year olds who have no business having sex in the first place, or even looking sexy. To me, sexy make-up isn't appropriate unless you want to get down. It's not authentic or honest and is distracting at best unless sex is intended.



By the way, you don't need any help in the beauty department.

Alright, I think I get your point of view a little bit more. Sorry if I came off a rude, it was just extremely hard for me to wrap my head around the fact that I thought you were claiming one that alters her appearance isn't a real woman at all. You just find your definition of true beauty is what's natural like a lot of men do & there's nothing wrong with that. It's your opinion & hey, it's much better than thinking true beauty comes in HH sized breast implants & over processed hair, etc. like a lot of men do these days hah.

Also, trust me when I say that makeup can duplicate a 'healthy glow' no problem these days. You'd be surprised. And thank you for the compliment.

 

[Mr. EcKo]

Back on Topic again

 

[crows]

Who am I to say what true human beauty is? I'm not. Only nature or God has the right to do that. A person can change their body how they see fit, but it doesn't make it an accurate representation of humanity. I have heard of under the muscle implants, but again, it isn't original equipment. It is a fair assessment so long as it applies to everyone.
Whether it is fair that one person is more naturally beautiful is fair or not is a different question. I'm saying it isn't a valid representation of what SHE, that individual woman really looks like and who she really is. Lots of things are fair, but unappealing to some. They are still fair assessments so long as they apply equally to all.

I understand the breast loss to cancer issue and how a woman would be motivated to get exact replacements to try to feel more like themselves as they were again. That is an example of RECONSTRUCTIVE surgery, like putting someone together after an accident, which isn't the same as elective plastic surgery.
Incidentally, the bags that breast implants are made of break down into toluene as it is in a human body, constantly releasing a small amount over time. Toluene is carcinogenic.
I read that in a book called How To Prevent Breast Cancer.

As far as make-up, I think it should look as if it has not been applied. The best looking women don't need it anyway. Often it is to make a woman look more beautiful in spite of poor health habits. Fit, healthy women have a natural glow of beauty about them that make-up really can't duplicate, that is more beautiful than make-up can achieve.

To me, Make-up with extreme colors either looks hyper-sexual or weird.
Sometimes I am in the mood for hyper sexual, or If I can see the woman is beautiful anyway, I don't let the make up distract me, but it doesn't really appeal to me.

I'm not against sexy make-up unless it is on children in those beauty pageants with 6 year olds looking like 20 year olds who have no business having sex in the first place, or even looking sexy. To me, sexy make-up isn't appropriate unless you want to get down. It's not authentic or honest and is distracting at best unless sex is intended.



By the way, you don't need any help in the beauty department.

I crown you the New Teemu!

 

[Blackthornone]

Alright, I think I get your point of view a little bit more. Sorry if I came off a rude, it was just extremely hard for me to wrap my head around the fact that I thought you were claiming one that alters her appearance isn't a real woman at all. You just find your definition of true beauty is what's natural like a lot of men do & there's nothing wrong with that. It's your opinion & hey, it's much better than thinking true beauty comes in HH sized breast implants & over processed hair, etc. like a lot of men do these days hah.

Also, trust me when I say that makeup can duplicate a 'healthy glow' no problem these days. You'd be surprised. And thank you for the compliment.

You are welcome.

 

[thenammagazine]

so you want organic women?

let me as you something bro, if your tooth chips, you are going to let it rot then?
because you cannot put something that is fake into your body,

I guess you would be against wearing glasses, since humans were not born with them, or what about clothes? or shoes, if you say you wear clothes or shoes you are crazy,

(YES I know Thats different, the implants go inside the body)
but then, like I said about the tooth,

Don't even bother. He's been hypocritical on just about every aspect of his pathetic attempts at an "intellectual" conversation, making exceptions when it suits him to do so, but condemning it outside of his extremely narrow-minded, lowbrow perspective.

 

[devilof76]

He doesn't even make sense. He could contradict himself 40 times in a single post (I'm being generous) and not know it if the contradictions were subsequently nailed to his forehead.

Porn stars are beautiful...

 

[crows]

He doesn't even make sense. He could contradict himself 40 times in a single post (I'm being generous) and not know it if the contradictions were subsequently nailed to his forehead.

Porn stars are beautiful...

they are good to look at

 

[Blackthornone]

He doesn't even make sense. He could contradict himself 40 times in a single post (I'm being generous) and not know it if the contradictions were subsequently nailed to his forehead.

Porn stars are beautiful...

Sasha Grey.....

 

[devilof76]

And the fact that she's a whore (flaming whore) makes her revolting.

But even going on looks alone, you're going to have to do better than one or two exceptions.

 

[thenammagazine]

And the fact that she's a whore (flaming whore) makes her revolting.

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks." I have a hard time believing you wouldn't dip your wiener if the opportunity presented itself.

 

[crows]

Sasha Grey.....

 

[thenammagazine]

Did she do a movie as a Mormon sister-wife?

 

[devilof76]

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks." I have a hard time believing you wouldn't dip your wiener if the opportunity presented itself.

Nope.

I've slept with women a hell of a lot more attractive than Sasha Grey. The fact that she licks toilets does not improve her chances.

 

[crows]

Did she do a movie as a Mormon sister-wife?

I tried to find the most innocent looking pic and found this LOL,
I don't know why she's dressed that way

 

[thenammagazine]

Nope.

I've slept with women a hell of a lot more attractive than Sasha Grey. The fact that she licks toilets does not improve her chances.

Like you've never had your face that deep in a toilet.

 

[devilof76]

I wasn't doing it for fun or money, and I can safely say I've never ventured a lick.

 

[crows]

Nope.

I've slept with women a hell of a lot more attractive than Sasha Grey. The fact that she licks toilets does not improve her chances.

there are really hot porn star girls, Lela Star is one that makes me crazy,
Zeina Heart is pretty cute, and Chanel Preston is pretty too

 

[Boba Ben]

We're talking about beautiful porn stars now? All right, I'll participate. Although she's skanky, she is quite lovely in my opinion. I feel kind of sorry for people in the life, though.