Started my Terminator marathon with Salvation. Can someone please tell me WTF is wrong with this movie? Why does it get bashed? I find it so fresh and original. The previous three had the same format where Salvation dared to bring new ideas into the universe! I personally enjoyed it. The action is unique as it is not over done but just perfect.
Once I read this there was no going back:
Downfall Of Terminator: All That is Wrong with Terminator: Salvation
Just....it was a waste. An attempt to turn the future war into an unnecessarily long trilogy of films where a single good film would have sufficed. Wasting time on some new character that has never been heard of before just because they felt they needed to persist with the idea of one 'good' Terminator. Humans against machines should have been the order of the day, to help create the sense of desperation that T1 had. Marcus, the T-850 and now Pops just cheapens the whole idea of a reprogrammed Terminator, which was a pretty cool idea that worked very well the first time. But dishing it out again and again and again, lame.
And by attempting to structure it as a trilogy it meant leaving out all the juicy stuff that people really wanted to see, saving it presumably for the third film which would never happen because no one cared about the first one. Very frustrating.
Hilariously, Genisys is also supposed to be part of a new trilogy. Maybe they're gonna go ahead with it regardless of the critic and fan reaction this time? If they can afford to do that then fair ****s to them, but otherwise they are being ridiculously over-optimistic.
He was supposed to be a young Reese though, who wasn't quite as beaten down and grizzled as Biehn. Or at least, that's what I thought watching it. He had the essence down, which was more important than looks to me anyway.Too geeky looking to be bad ass Reese.
It's a bit of a commitment to read this but I think it hits just about every nail on the head.
Downfall Of Terminator: All That is Wrong with Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
I skimmed it but it looked like that was just nitpicks galore. But I did forget about the blood orgasm thing. Totally silly.
Did you not read my post? Do you disagree with what I listed as the film's good qualities?
I watched Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines last night. Again, like The Lost World it was the first time watching it from beginning to end in over 10 years.
I was shocked to find that it has aged incredibly well. I don't even see why it'd need to be "ignored." It certainly works as a respectable follow-up to T2. Arnold looked great and his Terminator was cool. John being protected by his own killer? Brilliant!
Other highlights:
1. Solid acting all around.
2. Great action sequences
3. While it did repeat a couple gags like the broken sunglasses it actually did NOT repeat anyone saying "Come with me if you want to live," and most shockingly "I'll be back." I couldn't believe that neither of those lines were uttered. Sure Arnold said "She'll be back," and "I'm back," both technically those are NOT his catchphrase. Bravo to Mostow for not having gratuitous repeats of the most obvious lines of dialogue.
4. The crane truck flip. The Dark Knight totally copied it! The cable that is secretly attached, the loud rumbling followed by a split second of silence and a look of surprise by the driver, then of course the famous "front flip." Everyone is going off about the bus flip in Genisys copying TDK. Nope, it's just repeating the gag from T3 which TDK *also* copied.
5. Arnold determining that John is bluffing about killing himself by reading his facial features, pupil dilation, etc. Ava did this recently in Ex Machina. Very cool, and Ex Machina is a MUCH better movie, but T3 did it first.
6. Getting to see Skynet go live and become self aware seconds later. I actually liked the "global super virus" as an explanation for the US military turning it on before they felt it was really "ready." Also the system going live and then abruptly shutting down the monitors. Ultron did the same thing when he became self aware! Once again, T3 did it first.
7. I liked how the rampaging T1's mirrored the police shootout.
8. The whole "there isn't enough time" tension throughout the second half of the film. In T1 and T2 all the global turmoil happens "a few years from now" and all anyone needs to worry about is the immediate threat of one killer robot. But in T3 it's quite the bombshell that "this whole place" is going to be "gone" in just two hours and 53 minutes. And no one else knows it. Kinda freaky.
9. The T-850. He's all tactics and I love it. And he isn't gentle or really even nice. He just does what he's programmed to do and that's it. I don't even know that he repeats the "good Terminator" routine of T2. Uncle Bob really did seem good to me. Even though he was a machine, he still played as "good." T-850 was just going through the motions of carrying out his programming. And he deceived John and Sarah. He "won," both as a killer Terminator and as a protector whose programming to preserve their lives trumped their wishes of preserving everyone's lives. So in a way he was still an agent of Skynet, a harbinger of the Apocalypse because he did nothing to prevent the machines from having their Day. I thought that was a pretty awesome take on his character and really kept the film separate from both previous films and gave a nice edgy feel to the story. John thanks him at the end and the Terminator responds by reminding him don't worry we'll see each other again when I murder you? Damn...
10. The TX's killings really did bring back an element of horror to the story.
I'll stop there.
Cons:
1. Obviously "talk to the hand" and the pink sunglasses. Yes those were both "stupid," but...Arnold didn't play the T-850 as being "in" on the jokes. He played the hand and the sunglasses as just another tactic for his consideration. He went with the "hand" thing, decided the sunglasses were inappropriate and ditched them. A dumb "ha ha" moment for the audience, but HE wasn't turning and winking at the camera or anything so you can really take it as someone putting a silly hat on a rottweiler or something. The dog doesn't know it looks ridiculous and might still be prone to ripping your throat out.
2. Some handwaving is required to make sense of his programming. Obviously he was programmed to follow Katherine Brewster's commands but he ignored her demands to set her free from the back of the pickup truck. You could say it's a plot hole or that, like self-terminating, he can only follow her commands up to a certain point.
3. Bad TX tactics in the cemetary. The whole dropping the disguise from 30 yards away. Obviously she would have killed Catherine if the T-850 didn't show up but still, no reason for her to do that.
Honestly, not really much else to criticize than that. Which to my mind makes it a pretty damn solid chapter in the story and not in need of being dismissed. Even having John played by a different actor kind of lends itself to the notion of "John 1, John 2," etc., that some of us have enjoyed theorizing about in these threads.
The T 850 was a caricature at best...he even catches a bullet in his mouth like a Looney Tunes character. The actor playing John Connor was whiny, weak, and not what you would expect from a future soldier who was trained by her mother to save humanity. The villain wasn't that original, and in away, she was less advance than the T 1000. The fact that this film makes T2 and the ending of T2 irrelevant, is enough to ignore it, for me. I don't hate it, but I don't think of it as part III, I just think of it as an alternate timeline, like it's part of a multiverse. The action was cool when the T 850 wasn't delivering one liners and talking to the TX.
Anyone who revisits this and finds it a 'satisfying' chapter now is really viewing this on nostalgic terms like "hey Arnold looks young now relative to today" and "hey this doesn't look as bad as the crap to come in Genisys".
The villain wasn't that original, and in away, she was less advance than the T 1000.
The fact that this film makes T2 and the ending of T2 irrelevant, is enough to ignore it
How can the TX control cars and move gas pedals or steering wheels that have no mechanics to do so?
I did read and will read again later. I'm in work and it was simply easier to post that article as it details everything I hate about T3, there's a lot of good points amongst the nitpickery. Not to say that your post doesn't warrant consideration though so I'll go back to it later.
Anyone who revisits this and finds it a 'satisfying' chapter now is really viewing this on nostalgic terms like "hey Arnold looks young now relative to today" and "hey this doesn't look as bad as the crap to come in Genisys".
Enter your email address to join: