The Amazing Spider Man 2 (2014)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
it doesn't matter. you'll still get this...
ScreenShot2014-02-03at094045_zps39fc2124.png


LOL

*must remove mask to show my cry face. **** sakes.

Great. More Crying. Can't wait.

Gwen better be dead! :cuss
 
Gwen better be dead! :cuss


She will be

I actually think this film is going to be better than most think. I don't expect it to rival SM2, (never know though it could) but i think we could be in for a pleasant surprise.

I'm really starting to like where this series is going. Just too bad we had to deal with ASM (origin again) Like i said before now that it's out of the way the fun can begin. Hopefully Chris Coopers Goblin takes care of the sympathetic Villain this time. (even if it's only at the end)
 
Last edited:
When acting with a mask you have to express your emotions through your body actions. Slumped shoulders and lowered head can indicate defeat and sadness. Shaking can indicate anger and frustration. You have to become a more Physical actor to convey your feelings.

The movies have the added advantage that he can speak, music and camera direction. Remember the scene where Spidey webs the criminal on the wall? Garfield did a good job with the silliness Spidey displays when using his web shooters. He danced around, pretended to sneeze, etc. you could see Spidey's emotion through his actions.

Then he snapped to attention and the music even darkened once he focused on the guy's wrist tattoo. You could tell it was a tense and serious moment as was Spidey's attitude behind the mask.

I'm a bit confused now. You were arguing vociferously that we need to see faces or physical changes in the mask of some kind to appropriately convey emotion, yet here you seem to admit that you don't need to take the mask off to show emotion?
 
No, but i appreaciate the way Bardoon articulated his point and added to the discussion in a mature and positive manner.

One doesn't have to fully agree with anothers opinion to respect the way in which they present it.
 
No, but i appreaciate the way Bardoon articulated his point and added to the discussion in a mature and positive manner.

One doesn't have to fully agree with anothers opinion to respect the way in which they present it.

Hey now don't say that . It's positive and we don't like a lot of positive up in this *****. You better say somthing negative or yo *** is gonna be branded as a positive Nancy.

Lol jk
 

I've heard complaints that the suit is to cartoony and I couldn't help but laugh. Some people really don't understand the concept of a "comic book" movie. Yea it can be dark but for the most part it should be fun and vibrant. Atleast for a character like spidey. But he can be dark to
 
I've heard complaints that the suit is to cartoony and I couldn't help but laugh. Some people really don't understand the concept of a "comic book" movie. Yea it can be dark but for the most part it should be fun and vibrant. Atleast for a character like spidey. But he can be dark to

You sure they meant cartoony in that way? Several of the shots posted, even several of the small scenes I saw in the trailer, seemed a bit "video gamey." Something that's also been not only noticed by others, but has also been commented on.
 
I hear those kind of critiques no matter how good the CGI is. Some people are never going to be happy with it. But if they want this kind of comicbook-like action, they have to deal with the CGI. It really can't be done another way.

As for looking like a video game... that's a damn good looking video game. :lol
 
I remember everybody making a big fuzz in the Wolverine thread and praising the Jackman for his Wolverine and saying he's a much better Wolverine without the suit and mask.

"mneh mneh mneh Da mask iz seelleey and it don't werk on moveez" :rotfl

Yeah, the cgi in this movie looks videogamish, but only cause Spiderman videogames in the past have made a great job translating Spidey's moves an moving medium.
 
I remember everybody making a big fuzz in the Wolverine thread and praising the Jackman for his Wolverine and saying he's a much better Wolverine without the suit and mask.

"mneh mneh mneh Da mask iz seelleey and it don't werk on moveez" :rotfl

Yeah, the cgi in this movie looks videogamish, but only cause Spiderman videogames in the past have made a great job translating Spidey's moves an moving medium.

HughJackmanWolverinemask.jpg
 
Bad pic, we already went through it, remember? :lol if an amateur cosplayer can make a semi decent costume and a youtube channel can get the costume to look good, there's no reason a professional designer can't do wonders with it.

Just ignore the socks gloves :lol

tumblr_mmfw6nIPRC1razpcvo1_500.jpg
 
Bad pic, we already went through it, remember? :lol if an amateur cosplayer can make a semi decent costume and a youtube channel can get the costume to look good, there's no reason a professional designer can't do wonders with it.

Just ignore the socks gloves :lol

tumblr_mmfw6nIPRC1razpcvo1_500.jpg

That still looks hokey as ****. I think the mask looks better in the X-Force colors like the vs. Batman vid:

maxresdefault.jpg
 
I hear those kind of critiques no matter how good the CGI is. Some people are never going to be happy with it. But if they want this kind of comicbook-like action, they have to deal with the CGI. It really can't be done another way.

As for looking like a video game... that's a damn good looking video game. :lol

I wish Spider-Man video games looked this good :lol
 
Back
Top