ironwez20
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2008
- Messages
- 28,168
- Reaction score
- 6,196
As someone said most of these had no sequels in mind and gotg had appearances before 3
As someone said most of these had no sequels in mind and gotg had appearances before 3
Really? I think he made some bold decisions (some good, some not so much) that are central to why his work was so divisive. I'm all for different opinions, but you can't reference the MCU, and then call Snyder's work spineless by comparison.his entire vision was doomed to fail because it was so spineless
You only get so much pull. Especially on a project of that scale.A stronger film-maker would have held their on regarding any decisions being forced down their throat which they knew to be ill conceived.
If Snyder's contributions amounted to little, then how come he's always brought up in conversation?
If something ain't good, people move on and forget. It's been so many years, and Snyder's work still hasn't faded from relevancy.
His Batman and Superman still sell.
Calling your opinion "the reality" doesn't work for me.Honestly the fact is, the Universe and the stories were left unfinished because they simply did not pull in the numbers they needed to. At the end of the day that's the the reality whether anyone likes it or not. Take his handling of Doomsday and the whole death of Superman saga - i mean, the superman has barely been established, had one film and you decide to stuff introducing Batman, several JL characters AND Doomsday all into a single film? What was the rush? Marvel took a good dozen plus films before they decided to kill any of their main characters. You have to build up the stakes for a death to actually have any impact. And the less I say about Doomsday himself the better...
That is just one of several examples of how his entire vision was doomed to fail because it was so spineless
Yea right dude. You have some kinda alert system on your phone or something whenever Snyder is mentioned. It’s like the bat signal to you.Never been in this thread before. Thought I'd have a look out of mild interest. The last page is mainly Snyder.
Yea right dude. You have some kinda alert system on your phone or something whenever Snyder is mentioned. It’s like the bat signal to you.
SureUgh. Here we go again. Can we all just agree that Snyder had good ideas but they were destroyed by studio interference?
He had interesting concepts but can’t write to save his life and baited his fans for years to think he was coming back when he never was.
Like Snyder wasn’t bad visually but his execution is terrible and I don’t care what any Superfan says you don’t need to be a genius to understand any of his films. He isn’t on that level. And never was.
lol lord . No I didn’t fail to see anything they are just bad movies .Sure
He didn't write them. Baited his fans...into getting a 4 hour movie released that they wanted. How dare he!!
And yet many still fail to
I never said you did.lol lord . No I didn’t fail to see anything they are just bad movies .
I understand wanting to release his cut but baiting his fans and being cryptic about coming back was weird. It was weird. Not giving a solid answer and just trolling to try and stay relevant was odd and yea if you think it’s ok for some guy to constantly kick the hornets nest and feed into the toxic nature of his fans then idk what to tell you buddy.
All he had to say was I’m not coming back I’m onto new things.
The reasoning and excuses from Gunn are weak and actually insulting if he thinks they're legitimate and acceptable reasons that we would buy.
Basically, good films require time. Some people disagree with this apparently.what are his reasonings?
Kinda. And you did now be greatful with what you have.I never said you did.
Got the cut.
Maybe he wanted to come back. Maybe it's not about making you feel better.
Enter your email address to join: