- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 35,160
- Reaction score
- 2
Oh, I get it. It was 'meta', I get it. I'm saying I would've liked it more if it wasn't. If it was like Inception, Primer, or Donnie Darko where there was a bigger picture and the audience had to figure out what was going on. For example, if this film had no scenes 'in the control room', they only hinted and left clues that something larger was going on.
I'm saying if this film was more psychological or cerebral and made me think, instead of just 'entertaining' me, I would've felt it was more rewarding. But to be honest, that's not how Joss/Mutant Enemy works, and don't get me wrong, I wasn't expecting some brain-twister ending. I was just thinking about how another director could've handled the concept.
A lot of people wanted this. And I don't agree...sorry. I think the problem is horror movies today either try to be too dumb, or too smart. They miss the point of their existence, either scare, or entertain.
And then when films try to be scary, they're just gross, and boring.
I think the scary horror devices got spent in the early 80's. Aliens, babies, monsters, killers, ghosts.....almost all the scariest films of all time came from that era. And then they evolved to being entertainment.
And now they're trying to revert back to it. But it's not working. Saw isn't scary. Possessions aren't scary, PG-13 killers and ghosts aren't scary.
So I say, bring back the goofy stuff.