The Dark Knight Rises *SPOILERS*

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Eh. Somebody opened a door. Not exactly the sign of a society gone off the rails. People are just jittery at the moment.

SnakeDoc
 
Accurate to the source material didn't make Spider-Man any better, so why would've it made TDKR better?

And so what if it takes you in a unique direction? If you tell me TDKR isn't great because of story, plot, character, writing problems, alright. But if you tell me it's bad because it's not like the comics. Meh to that good sir.

I just pointed that out. B&R was far too close to the source material that it was gaudy on screen. Nolan's TDKR was so far removed from the source material that (IMO) it hurt it as far as being a "Batman" movie.
 
I liked some aspects of each part, but I found Knightfall/Quest/End to be quite bloated, especially the latter two arcs.

it's pretty clear that nolan borrowed from all 3 parts and I think that it hurt the story more than anything

left out important parts & characters/embellished the not important parts
 
I just pointed that out. B&R was far too close to the source material that it was gaudy on screen. Nolan's TDKR was so far removed from the source material that (IMO) it hurt it as far as being a "Batman" movie.

While I can see what you mean where B&R was close to maybe 50's and early 60's camp source material That had pretty much been tossed from the comics. I still don't get what the studio was thinking.

oh wait...action figures...
 
While I can see what you mean where B&R was close to maybe 50's and early 60's camp source material That had pretty much been tossed from the comics. I still don't get what the studio was thinking.

oh wait...action figures...

Most of which probably weren't even based on the ****ing film.
 
I liked some aspects of each part, but I found Knightfall/Quest/End to be quite bloated, especially the latter two arcs.

it's pretty clear that nolan borrowed from all 3 parts and I think that it hurt the story more than anything

left out important parts & characters/embellished the not important parts

I thought Knightfall itself was well done. Someone using Batman's own obsession and his entire gallery of villains to wear him down was pretty awesome.

However I do agree that Knights Quest and Knights End felt over the top and ridiculous.
 

3637640_o.gif
 
I'm going to see this again next weekend. It's definitely worth it. Besides, I think I've seen all of the Batman movies in theaters twice since Batman '89. Well, except Batman Forever and Batman and Robin. >.>
 
I thought Knightfall itself was well done. Someone using Batman's own obsession and his entire gallery of villains to wear him down was pretty awesome.

However I do agree that Knights Quest and Knights End felt over the top and ridiculous.

knightsquest was more about jean-paul going off his rocker :lol
 
One problem with Knight*, death/return of Superman, and giant crossovers like that is even if the story is good, there's always one book's artist that I hate.

I remember the art in Man of Steel being absolute ____ in that era. There were a couple of Bat-books I really didn't like the art in, either. But one of the books was fantastic - I think Detective Comics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top