DarkMagic
Super Freak
Look up psychofant.![]()
I did. Initially, Google came back with "Did you mean: sycophant" but then I saw the urban dictionary slang entry right under it. The most voted definition:
psychofant 28 up, 15 down
psycho + sychophant. Used to describe fans who are so obsessively sychophantic that they will like anything a band or artist does, and will like anything that band or artist likes to the point of freakish creepiness.
Interesting. I am a fan of the Nolan movies I have seen, but I admit, I haven't seen all of them. However, on these boards I rarely, if ever, spoke about his non-Bat films. I really liked the Batman movies, you really liked Avengers. How do you make the distintion between someone simply being a fan of an artist/character/actor/director and someone who is a "psychofant"? Because honestly, I don't see myself as being that extreme a fan or unreasonable with interpretations of his films, but of course, I may be biased. But then, so is every fan of any comic-book movie. By that broad definition, we're all "psychofants".
And using ancient Greek mythology as "modern myths" doesn't work.![]()
Reread my post. I said comic-book characters, not ancient Greek mythology, are our modern myths.
My point is simply, as you do with my posts, you read way too much into something and turn it into something it's not in an effort to make it more meaningful (when it doesn't have to be). For an example of this, see my "Nolancompoop" post in the Avengers thread where I essentially did exactly what you do with Nolan's Batman films.
I did read your "Nolancompoop" post in the Avengers thread. It was a well-thought out and solid argument. (Flattered that you would call that your "Nolancompoop" argument though, haven't come up with an Avengers-centric name yet?
![Dunno :dunno :dunno](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/old/Dunno.gif)