greygoose
Super Freak
Seeing this tomorrow.
The Hangover 2
- Thread starter The ill Jedi
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
wHySoSeRiOuS203
Super Freak
which is exactly why I'm watching this, same formula, different jokes, different location. Why mess with an already perfect formula?
batfan08
Super Freak
Certainly no Empire, but I knew that going in. If you liked the first, you'll probably like this one. (As others have stated, it's pretty much the same movie.)
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 35,160
- Reaction score
- 2
I hated it.
It was just the same movie, same plot, same jokes (most of the time) and same exact ending and reason for the entire night.
It's one thing to have the same formula...but it's another to just be the same movie, except in a different location.
It was just the same movie, same plot, same jokes (most of the time) and same exact ending and reason for the entire night.
It's one thing to have the same formula...but it's another to just be the same movie, except in a different location.
DinoLast
Super Freak
Correction: Same Jokes, but done badly.
You feel like you are sharing the ordeal, rather than finding it funny
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 28,342
- Reaction score
- 4,810
Seeing this today.
Not getting my hopes up.
Not getting my hopes up.
DinoLast
Super Freak
All these people that keep thinking that it should be different to the first film make me laugh...silly people
Well it was different in one way, it was not funny.
Voorhees27
Super Freak
I just don't get all the negativity. What do some of you expect from a sequel and in this category? Unless its the Godfather or Terminator, sequels are always worse than their original. Jeez even Porkys had sequels.
This kind of thing has happened over and over again, regardless of genre. Horror, comedy, action, drama, etc. At the end of the day its a freaking comedy, not Star Wars. Its a business, they don't make these films entirely to please you. You also have a choice, don't see it, rent it.
I haven't seen it yet and i'm sure I won't like it as much as the original but who cares.
This kind of thing has happened over and over again, regardless of genre. Horror, comedy, action, drama, etc. At the end of the day its a freaking comedy, not Star Wars. Its a business, they don't make these films entirely to please you. You also have a choice, don't see it, rent it.
I haven't seen it yet and i'm sure I won't like it as much as the original but who cares.
jayveeeusebio
Super Freak
Oh men, so sad to see this one didn't live the hype like the 1st one. Will still gonna watch it though.....in streaming haha!
Boba Ben
Super Freak
I've never seen the first one and my friend really wanted to see this so I went. I don't think it's my type of movie.
Nitro
Super Freak
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2006
- Messages
- 2,899
- Reaction score
- 0
I've seen it. The movie is fine. People had ridiculously high expectations after the first movie (which didn't make me in every single scene either). I liked the first movie and thought it was better...but this one isn't as bad as what people are making it out to be.
in every single scene either). I liked the first movie and thought it was better...but this one isn't as bad as what people are making it out to be.
firefly76
Super Freak
Yea it wasn't that bad, definitely not as good as the first one. I think it could have been funnier. I think the problem was how they showed what happened during the night of partying. It wasn't in depth. As of now Bridesmaid beat this out.
Man, Dino we gotta get you some happy pills. You've been a bit grumpy lately.
-------------------------------------
Haven't seen it yet. If its like the first movie planned out that way I'm sure I'll enjoy it. Maybe not as much as the first but enjoyment all the same.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 35,160
- Reaction score
- 2
The problem is....it's that it's exactly the same. In every. Single. Way.
Look at Ghostbusters 2...not everyone's favorite sequel, but it takes the forumla from the first movie and runs with it...but it does do a lot of different things. We get slime hate, and underground tunnels, more Winston, more action...all that jazz.
You can look at both movies and say they're similar, but not the same.
That's not how this movie plays out.
Long ass rant. Kept in Spoilers.
We start the movie the same way as Hangover..."Hey...we ____ed up....again..."
Alright. Haha. Kinda funny.
We go through the movie, as we are reintroduced to the characters. Funny lines, and jokes. I can dig it. Same kind of set up to the faithful night.
Alan comes back into play, he's just as wacky as ever. He's begging to come to Stu's wedding.
We then meet Teddy. Stu's wife to be's 16 year old brother. Alan feels like he is invading The Wolf Pack. So he automaticly hates him.
We get to the wedding, some hilarity ensues.
Phil and the crew beg Stu to have one drink by a campfire on the beach. Alan offers Marshmellows to Phil, and Phil, using his brain, knows it came from Alan, throws it across the beach. That's funny. And then they drink...
So at this point, the set up is exactly the same. But you know what? I can live with it. Because I know, how they got to the situation would be really funny, and cleaver....like the first.
They go through the waking up. We have....Stu with a tattoo, insted of a missing tooth, A monkey insted of a Baby and a Tiger, and Mr. Chow, who ends up overdosing with some Coke.
They have to hid the body, and it's pretty ____ing dark...but in a good way. I was totally with this movie.
Where's Teddy??? Oh ____! HIS FINGER IS HERE! Dark again! I dig it!
Then things start to go all samies.....they search for Teddy, just as they searched for Doug. They find him in Jail, and i'm thinking to myself...thank god, they found him early, so we can get that BS out of the way.
But no. It's an old monk. They keep searching, going from place to place, which is fine...
Hilarious scene with Stu realizing he got ____ed up the butt by a man.
And then...the reveal.....
IT WAS ALAN WHO DRUGGED THEM ALL AGAIN WITH THE ____ING MARSHMELLOWS.....
I hated the movie after that. Everything was the same.
There was a king pin evil mafia guy (Paul Giamatti) who claimed he had Teddy, but was lying to get to a not actually dead, just passed out Mr. Chow.
They find Teddy in the hotel, in the elevator. They get him back to the wedding. Stu stands up for himself again to a very tough father of the bride, Alan says dumb ____, further making him totally unlikable.
And Mike Tyson shows up.
Then they find pictures of the night in question. Yey.
Alright. Haha. Kinda funny.
We go through the movie, as we are reintroduced to the characters. Funny lines, and jokes. I can dig it. Same kind of set up to the faithful night.
Alan comes back into play, he's just as wacky as ever. He's begging to come to Stu's wedding.
We then meet Teddy. Stu's wife to be's 16 year old brother. Alan feels like he is invading The Wolf Pack. So he automaticly hates him.
We get to the wedding, some hilarity ensues.
Phil and the crew beg Stu to have one drink by a campfire on the beach. Alan offers Marshmellows to Phil, and Phil, using his brain, knows it came from Alan, throws it across the beach. That's funny. And then they drink...
So at this point, the set up is exactly the same. But you know what? I can live with it. Because I know, how they got to the situation would be really funny, and cleaver....like the first.
They go through the waking up. We have....Stu with a tattoo, insted of a missing tooth, A monkey insted of a Baby and a Tiger, and Mr. Chow, who ends up overdosing with some Coke.
They have to hid the body, and it's pretty ____ing dark...but in a good way. I was totally with this movie.
Where's Teddy??? Oh ____! HIS FINGER IS HERE! Dark again! I dig it!
Then things start to go all samies.....they search for Teddy, just as they searched for Doug. They find him in Jail, and i'm thinking to myself...thank god, they found him early, so we can get that BS out of the way.
But no. It's an old monk. They keep searching, going from place to place, which is fine...
Hilarious scene with Stu realizing he got ____ed up the butt by a man.
And then...the reveal.....
IT WAS ALAN WHO DRUGGED THEM ALL AGAIN WITH THE ____ING MARSHMELLOWS.....
I hated the movie after that. Everything was the same.
There was a king pin evil mafia guy (Paul Giamatti) who claimed he had Teddy, but was lying to get to a not actually dead, just passed out Mr. Chow.
They find Teddy in the hotel, in the elevator. They get him back to the wedding. Stu stands up for himself again to a very tough father of the bride, Alan says dumb ____, further making him totally unlikable.
And Mike Tyson shows up.
Then they find pictures of the night in question. Yey.
I'm not askin for the greatest comedy of all time...just something different enough to seperate from the first. I dont even care if it's the same formula...but ____ could've been different. And still funny.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 35,160
- Reaction score
- 2
I wish the opening of the 3rd one, they trick Alan, and send him on a plan to the Artic or something. He needs to go.
hairlesswookiee
PALPATINE CRUSADER!!!!
Man, Dino we gotta get you some happy pills. You've been a bit grumpy lately.
-------------------------------------
Haven't seen it yet. If its like the first movie planned out that way I'm sure I'll enjoy it. Maybe not as much as the first but enjoyment all the same.
You'd think he would be walking on sunshine now that the Superman figure is officially announced.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Asmus Toys: New Gollum and New Smeagol head- Latest: ObiGlennKenobi
-
Present Toys - PT60 - Flight Officer Aliens Ripley
- Latest: Monkey-bite84
