I have used some specifics and if you want more you can read my review. I've also tried to explain from someone who has spent a lot of time in the last 12 years getting to know this world why your line of thinking misses the mark. I've also said some of the same things others have said then you're like, "oh I see." It makes for a frustrating conversation for me. I'm also mindful to not go on and on about it. I as a mod don't want to make Dave look bad and as a staffer at TORn don't date make them look bad. So I just try to make my point quick and quiet.
.
But you are proving my point again...
You are coming at this as someone who has spent a lot of time the last 12 years getting to know this world. You may think I am "missing the mark" and that is fine. Perhaps I am as someone who is just trying to enjoy a film without taking a college course on it. But I know how I felt watching the film. I am not "missing any mark." I am watching this film without 12 years of study. I would hope that I don't have to have 12 years of study to understand this film.
We are just discussing a film here. I could be wrong but it feels to me like I can except that you enjoyed a film for all the wrong reasons (In my view) while you don't seem to be able to accept that I don't like the film, for all the wrong reasons (in your view) or as you so definitively put it "why your line of thinking misses the mark." I don't know if you know how that sounds but it's not the first time you have sounded that way. Personally I try and go out of my way not to make comments like that.
I don't mean to frustrate you but I feel I have shared with you why I thought your comments were not as "helpful" as the others. You may think you were getting the point across but something was getting lost in the translation between you and I. It may have something to do with your "showing me how I am missing the mark" way of putting things. Perhaps it was done in jest but that is getting lost somewhere also.
But here are your responses to me since I saw the film the 2nd time.
After I posted that I thought the score was the weakest of the three.
The score is really nice as usual with these movies. I love the way the OST came out myself.
OK cool. No specifics but cool.
Nothing happened? Really? Ok
Not sure how I should take that... So I laughed.
Jaws no offense but I don't feel like answering that post. If you really think nothing happened then it's not worth my time explaining why you're incorrect.
O...K..
You really need to read the book to find out why the places and things that happen are important.
Even without reading the book those places and events are important. Reading the book might help you understand this. This film does stand on its own.
I'm sure you're not alone. Beorn's introduction is important as he comes into play in film three. The spider sequence is important as it shows that Bilbo isn't the same Hobbit that left the Shire and we get the see the naming of Sting. Both these happen in the book. They get captured by elves in the book the movie way is a little better. The stuff in Thranduil's halls is fantastic. You get the great argument between Thorin and Thranduil. The hate that exists between the two and the greed of both is really well done. It also gives us a great character moment between Tauriel and Kili. Despite the hate between the leaders two can try to understand each other. We also get to see Bilbo show off his burglar skills and prove his worth to Thorin/company. The barrel sequence has a couple issues but is a little more exciting for most folks than the book sequence. Lake Town introduces us to Bard and what he's all about. He's kind of important to the story. You also get to see the corrupt nature of The Master and how bad Lake Town is. This plays into things in the future. I love most of the stuff in Erebor. Bilbo v Smaug was great. I would have taken some of the action out and put other stuff in earlier in the movie.
There are some nice character moments. Kili/Tauriel, Balin/Bilbo, Bilbo/Balin, Bilbo/Smaug. It had more than the book does really at this point. As far as the panoramic shots the areas we visit don't lead to much of that to be honest. I don't think you will find any place in NZ that looks like Mirkwood, Thranduil's halls, Lake Town, and inside of Erebor. All of these places had to be done the way they were done.
I thought there was plenty of dialogue.
This was a nice well though out argument.. Very much enjoyed this response. You made lots of nice points comparing the film with the book and why you liked or did not like some scenes and why you thought my arguments were incorrect. I responded with my own arguments and got this.
I don't know what to tell ya Jaws. I respect you're right to your opinion but for me it couldn't be more wrong.
I responded to this very well. No hard feelings. For you I could not be more wrong
Well, we will have to totally disagree. The music once again was simply fantastic and gave even more life to an already awesome movie.
.
No problem. No Specifics but no problem.
You keep saying they could have gone to Lake Town and nothing would have been missed. I can assure you that it would have and it would have pissed off a lot of Tolkien fans. Those moments are actually important to the story. As someone who knows a bit about Tolkien trust me on this.
More Book defense which has been your number one defence of the film.. Nothing about the film by itself. This has been my point to you from the beginning on why our opinions probably differ. I am coming at this purely as a film viewer... Not a fan (and I don't mean that in a bad way) of the books.
A one movie idea is a terrible terrible idea. Thank god Jackson didn't do that. Talk about finding a way to make things that are important to the story and making them not important. Thankfully the route he has gone has not diminished the events that are important to the story while adding several things that add to it. These aren't perfect and have some things I'd change, but as a whole things are pretty fantastic with these films.
That quote is totally incorrect.
I said the one movie thing once... I mostly have said two films.. You the kind of sort of make sense but to someone who has not read the book I think the whole Making things important not important is a bit lost on me. It's why when Ween said Smaug only had 3 pages in the book it really hit home. It was an excellent example.
You then seemed to get rid of this quote.
"It's amazing that I say these types of things and it just goes in one ear and out the other."
My point to all of this... I don't think you have been as specific as you think you have been other then using the book. You did this with our disagreement about the Sauron scene in the film also earlier in the thread.
Others have given specifics. Yours have been more general. It's why I have not been "getting" it with you.
As far as making Dave or TORn look bad... I hope you are never to the point of getting angry about talking about a film where you might post something and make others look bad... If that is the case then please Ignore my last 15 to 20 post. I will discuss with others. I don't want to make anyone angry over something like a movie.
I loved LOTR, I Love AUJ, I don't care for DOS.
But I am happy for the you and the other fans that love it.