Unless Mando figures prominently in the next movie trilogy that would follow after Rey's adventures.
Then they are crossing streams, which we all know from Egon is a bad thing to do.
Yep, in order for the two realities to have any kind of simultaneous but separate coherence with the general public they couldn't have confusing overlap.
Like how Agents of Shield and Netflix Marvel acknowledged the films but not the other way around.
This kind of thing can only work if the creators/writers and audience are willing to accept major plot holes. This is what I was referring to the other day about the WBW opening up a mess of nonsense.
Like I had said in a previous post, an alternate timeline *already has to exist* because of that WBW episode of Rebels. That was already a given. Ezra became the catalyst for the "Prime" SW timeline that has been playing out on screen, while the timeline where Ahsoka never gets pulled out went unseen by the audience.
Remember, Ezra takes Thrawn out of the picture in the timeline where he saved Ahsoka. That's a huge deal. And she's the one who talked Ezra out of saving Kanan. And that itself is relevant because Kanan's sacrifice led (indirectly *and* directly) to the Thrawn/Ezra hyperspace escape. A timeline without Ahsoka would mean a completely different ending to the Rebels series, including what happens with Kanan and/or Thrawn.
The idea that the butterfly effect could lead to these two timelines *both* happening on screen (where one leads to the ST and one doesn't) means that the OT would play out *differently* in each timeline. What happens (or doesn't happen) to Thrawn pre-OT changes the landscape of the Empire. You can't credibly say that the events of the OT would not have differed regardless of the presence of Ahsoka and Thrawn (and potentially Kanan) for an extended period of time.
If LFL/Disney were to ever go through with something like this, the inevitable plot holes will end up being monumental. There are plenty of SW fans who aren't stupid, and are very capable of deconstructing logic flaws that would end up undermining so much credibility from these stories.
That's why I'd separate the two canons between "movie SW" vs. "movie + TV SW." In other words one canon would just be the self-contained "Skywalker Saga," the end. Rebels wouldn't exist in any fashion, so Ezra and the WBW would be a non-issue. In the Skywalker Saga there is no multiverse whatsoever. Or just the Skywalker Saga + RO/Solo works too. Then you could just throw out all of TCW (it was always goofy having Ahsoka so prominent but somehow not being in the films anyway), throw out all of Rebels as well as The Mandalorian.
People who want Ahsoka, Rebels, and Mandalorian as part of their "canon" can have them but then also have to accept the utter X-Men level cluster****** of continuity plot holes. They get their "ST free" cluster******y SW and we get our much simpler movie only SW. Works for me.
Last edited: