The Mandalorian (Star Wars Live Action Series)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Khev you are the one losing your grip. Once again, I know the content exists in the real world. I'm just not a sheep who accepts the story group's definition of what Star Wars content is. It's no different than having a "personal cannon" that you are touting.

This discussion has nothing to do with personal canon. It's whether or not having a personal canon means you must detach yourself from reality and live in a fantasy world of your own creation. There is literally no subjectivity as to whether the "Skywalker Saga" is the official name of the nine episodic SW films. None.
 
This discussion has nothing to do with personal canon. It's whether or not having a personal canon means you must detach yourself from reality and live in a fantasy world of your own creation. There is literally no subjectivity as to whether the "Skywalker Saga" is the official name of the nine episodic SW films. None.
What kind of nonsense is this?
fdd344b55e000eaed337ba042d9cae61.gif


Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 
Apparently Season 3 begins production in April

https://www.comingsoon.net/tv/news/1161537-the-mandalorian-season-3

According to the Film & Television Industry Alliance, Lucasfilm is currently expecting to start production on the highly-anticipated third season of The Mandalorian on April 5, 2021, in Los Angeles. This news comes after more than two months since the popular Star Wars series concluded its 8-episode second season.

https://productionlist.com/production/mandalorian-season-3/

Tho I'm dubious about the direction this show is going:horror...also, it's a LONG wait anyway.
 
Khev.....you lost me. I couldn't seem to find a coherent point in your rambling posts.

Somehow it's OK to dismiss the dreck churned out by Chuck Wendig which gets the Disney SW stamp of approval, yet I MUST accept the movies which also have the Disney stamp of approval?

What's the difference?

I personally don't like everything Lucas did, but at least he had the authority to dictate what is and isn't canon within his own creation, no matter how stupid it was. He created Star Wars. He controlled Star Wars. He didn't do it alone, but the seeds of it all came out of his imagination.

He had nothing to do with anything Disney has churned out. None of it has any true legitimacy. That Chuck Wendig ******* doesn't get to tell me what is or isn't "real" in the SW universe. Neither does Kathleen Kennedy.

What are you getting all upset about? Disney sold a box set called "The Skywalker Saga" so I'm supposed to accept it in my heart for some reason cause it's printed on a box?

I don't know what you want from us. Your typing is all unhinged and crazy.

The Disney Trilogy simply doesn't exist to me. It was extremely poor fan fiction, that's all. It's completely illegitimate in my mind, like when a company acquires the rights to a property and slaps a name on a movie that has nothing to do with the original.

"American Psycho 2." That's what the Disney movies are to me. They're the SW equivalent of American Psycho 2.
 
Khev.....you lost me. I couldn't seem to find a coherent point in your rambling posts.

Somehow it's OK to dismiss the dreck churned out by Chuck Wendig which gets the Disney SW stamp of approval, yet I MUST accept the movies which also have the Disney stamp of approval?

And when did I ever say that.

You both seem very, very confused about the difference between something that merely exists vs. something that you "accept."
 
Khev you are the one losing your grip. Once again, I know the content exists in the real world. I'm just not a sheep who accepts the story group's definition of what Star Wars content is. It's no different than having a "personal cannon" that you are touting.

^^^^Who is confused again?
 
^^^^Who is confused again?

That would be you, stated point blank with your own words:

Okay I'll give you an opportunity point blank to show whether you're a "personal truther" or not.

Is the official name of Star Wars Episodes I-IX "The Skywalker Saga" or not?

Super easy yes or no question. Have at it. :)

Lol, I just said several times that it isn't.

You think that reality is only reality if you "accept" it. That just isn't how objective truth works but I realize that I'm wasting my time talking to a wall at this point.
 
This has already all been discussed above at length but again yes I know that Kennedy wants to call Episodes 1-9 the "Skywalker Saga". I just don't acknowledge the ST as Star Wars content. You are insisting I accept this as gospel because Lucasfilm printed it on a Blu Ray box set but then out of the other side of your mouth ignoring other Star Wars content yourself and making up your own personal cannon. You at least have to be consistent or it makes you look crazy.
 
So acknowledging that there's an official term for Star Wars Episodes I-IX is simply beyond what you're capable of understanding. It literally "doesn't make any sense" to you. Wow, lol.

In the post below #1 I acknowledged that Lucasfilm says 1-9 is "The Skywalker Saga" and I go on to say that I don't acknowledge the ST as Star Wars content. Which apparently is a big problem now, but not in your other response #2


#1) Lol, I just said several times that it isn't. According to Kennedy's Lucasfilm it is but that doesn't make it so. A stroke of a pen can change the corporate definition at any given moment.

#2) Otomofan: yet I MUST accept the movies which also have the Disney stamp of approval?

Khev: And when did I ever say that.

Also Khev: There is literally no subjectivity as to whether the "Skywalker Saga" is the official name of the nine episodic SW films. None.
 
In the post below #1 I acknowledged that Lucasfilm says 1-9 is "The Skywalker Saga" and I go on to say that I don't acknowledge the ST as Star Wars content.

The first part in bold has literally *nothing* to do with the second part in bold. Nothing. They are two separate and completely unrelated statements. We aren't talking about what you "acknowledge as SW content." What you or I accept into our personal canons is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
 
Yes I know that Kennedy/Lucasfilm have corporately labeled 1-9 "The Skywalker Saga". We have discussed that several times and you keep circling back. Can somebody call JYE and tell him Khev needs a ride home?
 
Yes I know that Kennedy/Lucasfilm have corporately labeled 1-9 "The Skywalker Saga".

And yet earlier you thought that stating that "doesn't make any sense" and that simply acknowledging that I-IX is called the Skywalker Saga means that you somehow, inexplicably, must "accept" the ST as part of your personal canon. :cuckoo:

There's lots in the "Disney Canon" that I don't accept but I'm not gonna be an idiot and say that "there is no Disney Canon" just because I don't accept it. Come on now, quit going full Happy Gilmore on me, lol.
 
Now that Mando Luke is being hailed as the greatest single modern SW event they should change the title to:

Mandalorian: The continuation of the Skywalker Saga

That way it will be a perfect fit for when it eventually connects to the ST lol
 
I'll accept the backpedal while still recognizing that that's exactly what you're doing. ;)



No you can't do this all day. If you could then you'd be able to stand your ground without needing the validation of "millions of other fans." Waiting until *after* the portals open before mustering the courage to go to battle just isn't Cap's way. ;)

Of course I don't recognize Ghostbusters 2016 as being part of an ongoing story with GB 1 and 2. GB2016 doesn't even consider itself part of the same story, lol. Dark Fate certainly does and if the studio started calling T1, T2, and DF "the Cameron Saga" then I'd have no problem acknowledging the actual moniker when talking specifically about those three films as a whole. You don't have to like something in order to acknowledge reality. I usually bristle at calling Star Wars "ANH" since that isn't what it was originally called but it *is* the official episode subtitle and often times it's just easier to use as a point of reference.

Marvel started all this with "Phase I,", Phase II," "The Infinity Saga," and so on and since SW is just going to keep going on apparently forever just like Marvel then compartmentalizing certain sections just makes logical sense. Calling it out as phony or desperate is just silly and intellectually dishonest.

Khev, how about you stop using the validation of the corporate overlords and try to defend the argument of the existence of a “Skywalker Saga” on your own merit and defenses?
 
So is American Psycho 2 "canon?"

Bret Easton Ellis didn't write it. Christian Bale wasn't in it. But there's a movie with the title "American Psycho 2" and it's owned by the same people that own the copyright to the title of the first movie.

So is it "canon" even though nobody that had anything to do with American Psycho was involved with it? I mean....the label on the DVD says "American Psycho 2" so I suppose it's an official part of the Patrick Bateman Saga, even though he's not played by Bale and he gets killed in the first few minutes by Mila Kunis. Even though it was literally another movie that they retitled "American Psycho 2" at the very last minute to cash in on the popularity of the first movie, it still counts right?

I guess it's canon. Khev said whoever owns the copyright gets to dictate that....not the creators of the actual story.
 
Back
Top