Not liking that. At all.
Well, it was much more important to add some fight scenes that don't actually happen in the book.
Not liking that. At all.
Not liking that. At all.
Directors Cut....
It's not indulgent, it's proper character development. I'd rather know and understand the protagonists and sacrifice some of the glitz of protracted fight scenes.
It will be very easy to destroy the film from this perspective. The paradox is that this is probably still the best Watchmen movie we could have gotten. But we have to sacrifice depth for "cool scenes" like watching Silk Specter fight some guys in prison and when it comes to Rorshach, let's not bore people with some genuinely mature psychological stuff when we could instead focus on some "bad ass" Saw flashbacks. We got better than I expected but let's not lose sight of the fact this is still Zack Snyder directing and not someone better.
I know I need to get over it, but it still really bugs me that there will be an assembled group of adventurers called "Watchmen"
The movie could most definitely have included the Rorschach scene.
I don't understand why that would be such a huge deal anyway.
I was being sarcastic.
I loved Watchmen all throughout, but when I hit Chapter VI "The Abyss Gazes Also," on a personal level Watchmen transcended the typical...
I want to still be able to enjoy the movie for what it is.
not to mention that Synder wanted the film to be a commentary on the Superhero movie genre
Very graphic.just re reading the book, whats ppl read online reffering to the graphic nature of the movie compaired to the book, i mean not talking of the onscreen rape scenes but in terms of graphic violence etc??
Very graphic.
Exploding people, broken bones, arms getting cut off, ya know....good stuff.
just re reading the book, whats ppl read online reffering to the graphic nature of the movie compaired to the book
The whole movie no but parts were specifically meant to do that like Ozy's nipples being a kin to Batsuit from the 90s.
Enter your email address to join: