lerath666
Super Freak
Both were pretty Bad, for different reasons.
out of those two, i'm gonna have to say Green Lantern was better.
out of those two, i'm gonna have to say Green Lantern was better.
I have to go with Amazing Spider-man. Man of Steel is up there, but I feel Amazing Spider-man did it better. Not ONLY with Peter Parker himself, but it also built the development of the REST of the cast, something that MoS lacked outside of Superman.
Coming out of both movies, I was much more pleased and excited about ASM than I was MoS. And considering how they're doing with Amazing Spider-man 2 and the excitement THAT is generating shows there was much more confidence behind that than what MoS did. Unfortunately Superman can't get a sequel on his own and Batman has to be thrown into the mix.
I wouldn't really call Osborn a mentor, since he doesn't really teach Peter much or bond with him. Sympathetic in some ways but not a mentor or fully sympathetic. Otherwise, the films are pretty similar yeah, such as the ending with Peter nearly pushing off the love interest.ASM and SM are both about Peter Parker's origin, down to his uncle getting killed, and a mentor/sympathetic scientist who uses green chemicals to turn him into a supervillain. There are superficial differences (Gwen Stacey, the Lizard, Peter's parents, etc.) but it's still a beat for beat retelling of the 2002 film.