Would the pharmaceutical industry conceal a cure?

[work13]

The main posters in here are all full of Poo and just like to hear themselves talk......... Lock er up Jen.....

8173 piles of poo just adds to the stink. Just leave the thread and it will smell much better. Where's the love thrift??

 

[devilof76]

If the main posters are in agreement, why would it be locked up, unless a select minority like yourself disagrees with it and can't beat their arguments?

You aren't making arguments. You are compiling statements with zero factual basis, repeating them, and evading direct contradictions to your point of view.

You would sooner see it locked up to support your opinion by removing contrary opinions to your own from being expressed? Why not just move on then?

Your opinions are dangerous, if for no other reason that they ignore all rational standards of scientific knowledge. Why not move on? Because soapboxing by those advancing the theories of charlatans is hardly welcome here (and hopefully, never will be).

Furthermore, you make the assumption that the main posters like to hear themselves talk when perhaps they just have a lot more to say than others have.

And perhaps they simply like to hear themselves talk. They certainly have no decent respect for rational challenges to their arbitrary claims.

Talking in depth about a topic is what you do in a serious thread about serious subjects when people want more than just grunts and ahhs, to simply either agree or disagree, without any in depth discussion. Intellectual discussion is not for everyone.

No kidding. As I said before, science is hard.

You might want to look into that.

If you have no interest in said topic, or in discussing it more than you already have, why not move on rather than put a wet blanket on OTHER people's edification from the thread by locking it up? Too threatened by opinions contrary to your own, expressed with more knowledge than you have on the subject?

There is no discussion taking place in this thread, other than what occurs between those who have recognized the specious legitimacy of the scientific claims being proffered. Those who believe that cancer can be cured by prayer or eating your vegetables are merely regurgitating the spiels by which they became convinced, and then either casting those who disagree as slavishly ignorant, or grossly immoral.

There is no science to debate. There is no evidence of hidden cures for pecuniary gain. There is merely supposition based upon envy and distrust of companies that make ungodly amounts of money, and the proper response to such is not to dignify it with refutation, as though it were a simple misapplication of logic. It is an affront to logic.

The thread is useless, except for those with an axe to grind/agenda to promote.

 

[Niltusk]

OMG! I wondered where this steaming pile of posts went. I thought some mod pulled the plug and invis'd the whole thing. So is this where all the dirty secrets are hidden? Kinda like what a cat does in the Sandbox.

 

[Blackthornone]

The science of the effectiveness of natural medicine is suppressed at the same time that the cures themselves are. They go hand in hand by implication. There have been bills introduced to regulate nutritional supplements as drugs, put forth by those who have vested interests in drug profits, and there have been people who have been cured of cancer with nutrition. If you decide to make the only acceptable proof of anything only what the mainstream media and science approves of, then no one will find any scientific proof.
You say you demand scientific proof, but those who want to sell drugs suppress the science that proves that natural methods are effective. As a result, there isn't any, because if there was, then drug profits would be greatly reduced.

 

[devilof76]

Just for you, I asked the media, the drug companies, and the scientific establishment to leave this thread.

Now, you can share the proof with us.

 

[Devil_666]

I'd like to see statistics on the number of people whose cancer went into remission when they changed their diet, and the number of people who died anyway when they changed their diet.

Those statistics don't exist.

Then after 50+ pages of tin-foil hat conspiracy theory drivel:

there isn't any.

 

[Blackthornone]

Then after 50+ pages of tin-foil hat conspiracy theory drivel:

There isn't any proof sanctioned by "established" sources because that is part of how the drug companies control the paradigm. I already mentioned Anne E. Frahm's success, which proves it can be done, but since there is no "proof" in an "official" established publication, there is nothing to show. It is a catch 22.

 

[devilof76]

Anne E. Frahm is dead.

 

[Devil_666]

It is a catch 22.

Actually it's just convenient for you and your conspiracy theory. You can't prove one, so you just add another on top of it to explain that one. It's like a snowball of crazy.

 

[Blackthornone]

Anne E. Frahm is dead.

Interesting. However that does not refute the fact that she was cancer free in 6 weeks by way of a nutritional program when conventional medicine had failed. Everyone dies someday.

 

[LordAzrael]

Explain to me how a single case "prooves" anything. You haven't excluded either natural remission or placebo effect from possible causes, both of which can be statistically proven as occurring.

 

[devilof76]

Exactly.

Interesting. However that does not refute the fact that she was cancer free in 6 weeks by way of a nutritional program when conventional medicine had failed. Everyone dies someday.

It was the nutritional program? How do you know?

Are you aware of what killed her?

 

[Wulf]

To answer your question Nova, yes definitely.

I've been on medicines my whole life and will be until the day i die. Luckily for me i was born in the UK and have my medical needs taken care of by the NHS.

May I ask what you have?

 

[devilof76]

Yes, definitely? So, then, you must have proof.

 

[Wulf]

Yes, definitely? So, then, you must have proof.

Wow, you are a very confrontational person.

 

[devilof76]

How can you tell?

 

[Wulf]

How can you tell?

Because I am one too!

 

[King Darkness]

Wow, you are a very confrontational person.

Understatement of the day.

You win a cookie.

 

[Wulf]

Understatement of the day.

You win a cookie.

 

[thenammagazine]

[ame]https://youtu.be/dyMXYE_50Ts[/ame]