Are you saying some of them being robots is dumb?I forgot about that movie. It was so dumb. Some of the zombies were zombies but some of them were robots… for some reason.
Are you saying some of them being robots is dumb?I forgot about that movie. It was so dumb. Some of the zombies were zombies but some of them were robots… for some reason.
The whole movie was dumb.Are you saying some of them being robots is dumb?
Dumb in what context?The whole movie was dumb.
Dumb as in dog **** nonsense.Dumb in what context?
How so?Dumb as in dog **** nonsense.
Cringey, poorly written, hideous like every recent Snyder movie. No substance to anything in it, no characters or plot worth caring about.How so?
OK, I'll grant you that he's probably not too set in his ways as he's probably smart enough to realize he needs to keep his options open given the ever-changing landscape of the entertainment industry. But inserting chapter cards into an already filmed movie like JL is not the same as filming it with a episodic/series format in mind. If he had that in mind from day one he would have likely blabbed about it even before he "stepped aside" from JL and WB brought in Whedon, but instead it wasn't brought up until years later when he was desperate to get his version seen and willing to massage it into whatever form was necessary to make that happen on HBO.My point is that he is most likely not too set in his ways and doesn't think anything but feature films are beneath him or he probably wouldn't have suggested it. Plus he put ZSJL into an episodic format but now it's used as 6 parts of a movie.
Always glass half empty when it's Snyder isn't it.OK, I'll grant you that he's probably not too set in his ways as he's probably smart enough to realize he needs to keep his options open given the ever-changing landscape of the entertainment industry. But inserting chapter cards into an already filmed movie like JL is not the same as filming it with a episodic/series format in mind. If he had that in mind from day one he would have likely blabbed about it even before he "stepped aside" from JL and WB brought in Whedon, but instead it wasn't brought up until years later when he was desperate to get his version seen and willing to massage it into whatever form was necessary to make that happen on HBO.
Where are my Rebel Moon figures?
Where's 'Tarzan'?
Where's 'the Witch'...?
Where's dirty King Titus...?
I want the R-rated versions only!!! And I want that threesome!
Or the glass is twice as big as it needs to be lol...Always glass half empty when it's Snyder isn't it.
Even Jodorowsky was self aware enough to know his words were the equivalent of trying to spin his farts into Jungian alchemical gold, and tell people that's what they were smelling.I appreciate that in this mythos’ good vs. evil design the force of “good” shows up as Druidic in nature, i.e., through connection to the earth, the wild, Nature, etc. That’s fun to play with.JimmyC-3PO [on a primitive natural throne] in particular in that aspect.JimmyCp-3PO is to me a symbol of alchemical conjunction.
I'm not a fan of heist films, but it had zombies, so I watched it. They did a disservice to heist and zombie films, but still got a sequel which I watched with a group and thought was better than the first with all the stupid zombies.I got 20 mins into AOTD then noped the f outta there. Life’s too short.
Army of the Dead was okay. Didn't love or hate it. The spin-off although mildly entertaining but it has the type of humor I despise.I'm not a fan of heist films, but it had zombies, so I watched it. They did a disservice to heist and zombie films, but still got a sequel which I watched with a group and thought was better than the first with all the stupid zombies.
Better being a comparative statement and not any admission of it being good.
Naked Atticus Noble and the alien tentacled twins?
It wasnt very memorable, I just remember not outright hating it (I don't like heist movies), so what humor are you referring to?Army of the Dead was okay. Didn't love or hate it. The spin-off although mildly entertaining but it has the type of humor I despise.
Be aware of the distinct lack of good writers being utilized in today's entertainment industry. Synder might not be good at putting a script together but that's not for lack of trying.
Take a look at the majority of shows/films. The only effort put forth is pushing an agenda above all else. The theme of the content takes second place to that.
It's fine to criticize him for this but just apply that same logic to others.
I was actually.. Ok with this. But I attribute that to myself just absolutely despising 90% of zombie films. I hate zombies. I hate movies about them, generally.Army of the Dead was okay. Didn't love or hate it. The spin-off although mildly entertaining but it has the type of humor I despise.
I was actually.. Ok with this. But I attribute that to myself just absolutely despising 90% of zombie films. I hate zombies. I hate movies about them, generally.
Resident Evil and 30 days Later or whatever it was called, I liked. I find zombie horror extremely uninteresting, usually. It's far too simple of a plot. It requires characters you'd find interesting or entertaining to get through it, for me personally.
I liked a few characters from Snyder film on that. Saved it for me.
Zombies just bore the **** out of me. The film itself wasn't terribly amazing by any stretch of the imagination but I was entertained. Solid 6/10 for me. Was ok. Not good. Not bad.
Just ok. And I'm good with that.
I think the genre is more about placing the viewer in the film then it is about story telling often times.
Enter your email address to join: