InArt: 1/6 Superman (Cavill)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Honestly what’s the point of this “Justin inspired” curl? I liked it sculpted more
IMG_0259.jpeg
 
It's kinda funny how much this sculpt reminds me of the OSK sculpt. Which is either a testament to how good that OSK sculpt was, or how much softer the Inart one looks now...
OSK sculpt is great, it doesn’t photograph well bc of softer paint but in person it looks truly good. There are bootlegs everywhere and ppl are mistaken all the time when they don’t give credit to the original release.
 
It's kinda funny how much this sculpt reminds me of the OSK sculpt. Which is either a testament to how good that OSK sculpt was, or how much softer the Inart one looks now...
OSK sculpt was definitely even softer than what we got here.
 
People mistaking bokeh and camera focusing with sculpt softness....
Heard the same exact thing in the Aragorn threads...
People never learn

The smaller something is, the harder it can be to get it really sharp in focus, unless you are shooting with your aperture closed all the way down.

The prototype looks so much sharper, partially because that is just the nature of prototypes, but the promotional photo is also in perfect focus.
The production shot on the right here is not completely in focus, and some of the "softness" of the sculpt is honestly just coming from that.

That being said, I think the production figure looks great.

536477-inart-superman-prototype-vs-final.jpg
 
I hope so, although I still think it flares out too much. I see people here talking about soft sculpts and speckled paint, while I'm wincing at how bad the cape still looks. We were so close to greatness. It's still better than HT attempt though.
 
Honestly what’s the point of this “Justin inspired” curl? I liked it sculpted more
View attachment 727914
Justin's suggestions have been nothing but crap honestly.

Justin also suggested the track system on the magnetic bases that still can't hold a figure.

Meanwhile, they ignored all our suggestions that would have made a much improved figure.
 
Sculpt softness aside, a lot of realism was lost on the hair and eyebrows due to paint difference.
You can’t prove that here, ppl are either blinded by excitement or acting dumb on purpose. Most of them saying they can’t see any difference. Personally I stopped arguing. Sculpt looks great but it doesn’t look as great as it used to and when I pay 400$ “mass production softening” can’t be an excuse. When InArt stepped in they promised “next level” realism. I don’t see it here. Their figures are great but I don’t see any reason them costing two times more than hot toys. Hope in person I’ll be blown away and I’m just complaining for no reason.

Justin's suggestions have been nothing but crap honestly.

Justin also suggested the track system on the magnetic bases that still can't hold a figure.

Meanwhile, they ignored all our suggestions that would have made a much improved figure.
Yep
 
Last edited:
Back
Top