- Joined
- Jul 28, 2019
- Messages
- 2,195
- Reaction score
- 1,556
I just saw this movie with my wife. I’m still in shock.. I don’t recall this movie being marketed as a musical?
Probably dropped 1000 on the inart joker pack. Sheesh I do not envy those guys rn.
GET OUT OF THE SHOWER, Jye! Before someone offers you their friendship!
lady Gaga.......I just saw this movie with my wife. I’m still in shock.. I don’t recall this movie being marketed as a musical?
the beginning is a really annoying cartoon sequence retelling the ending of the first one.Cartoon scene...? Horrors of horrors...
the beginning is a really annoying cartoon sequence retelling the ending of the first one.
it's an annoying musical.
it's in the style of Looney tunes with music and is being playful and silly and like a fairy taleOh god... it's starts the worst way possible. Like Roger Rabbit.
Sadly like me jye has to process what he saw and he probably took it harder then me. Probably laughing at the sky as we speakIs jye getting "Brendan Gleesoned" by this film as we speak?
I thought about that.Sadly like me jye has to process what he saw and he probably took it harder then me. Probably laughing at the sky as we speak
Or
He probably loved it and doesn’t know how to tell us
What if jye was so demoralized by the film that he cried, decided to stop being jye, and then was shivved on his way out of the theater?
It’s just funny how transparent everything is with this.
Definitely reminds me of Rob Zombie but also David Gordon Green and Jamie Lee Curtis and how they view the world and its fans.
Making something then not liking when the fans form their own opinions about it or when fans are vocal about a direction they didn’t like that was chosen.
It’s clear these people only view us as a well to run to when they want to fund a lavish purchase or want their name in the press again, washing their hands when it’s convenient. What does this film, RZ Halloween II and Halloween Ends have in common? They all feature insufferable characters, lack a coherent and cohesive story w/o a single badass in sight, in short, a waste of time and undeserving of the IP.
What kid wants to dress up as jail bait that got shanked in prison this Halloween?
That’s our supervillain?
In the context of what I was talking about- ghostbusters 2 is not a good reference. Ghostbusters 2 set out to be a safe satisfying sequel, similar in tone and general vibe as the first. A supernatural force will threaten to destroy the city and the ghostbusters will save the day. It was the exact opposite of risky. Taking an anti hero movie like joker and having the sequel be a musical that almost purposefully thumbs its nose at the first is a very nonintuitive decision. Wether or not the character growth was a retread of the first one is irrelevant to that. You can say having the same character growth was a bad decision, or making it a musical was a bad decision, or thumbing its nose at the first one and making it almost purposefully unsatisfying was a bad decision- but it is certainly bold and wildly outside the box from what anyone could imagine the sequel being. To say this movie didnt take risks is absolutely insane. The entire genre of the movie is a risk. If the creators just wanted to make money and satisfy their audience it would have gone a totally different direction but they clearly weren't interested in telling that kind of story. When you set out to make a sequel to joker and decide on it being a musical you know your already working uphill and the audience is going to fold its arms and doubt what you're trying to do. I didnt care for the movie but the spirit of the decision is what I'm saying I appreciate. Especially in todays movie climate where anything close to that almost never happens. I want to see more of these kinds of risky decision in movies. Not all movies need to be like this, but we need some. Most will fail, but the ones that dont will truly leave an impact.deep down at its core this movie is like Ghostbusters 2
there's not much growth, take out the bells and whistles and on the plot itself, as far as character growth, there is none.
in character development, Ghostbusters 2 didn't have any character growth, they are just exactly where they were in Ghostbusters 1 in terms of being down on their luck, at the beginning of that movie.
they are low on money and went their different ways, they get together to investigate and catch ghosts, like a spiritual remake of Ghostbusters 1 as far as character growth...
with this joker they kind of play it safe in that way, there's no real continuation or growth from the first one, he's down on his luck, treated like crap. abused by the system around him.
no, I would say that this movie didn't take any real risks. it took risks in making it a musical and bringing Gaga
but it almost had the same character structure as the first.
Enter your email address to join: