Jazzinc 1/6 Batman 1989 Batmobile

The Buffinator said:

Pretty unbiased but I could only shake my head when he started fixating on insignificant stuff like (a) how the canopy "could" fall into the cockpit & cause wear and (b) how the gear shifters rattle when moved and aren't as smooth as he'd like. Keep sliding the canopy back & forth and flicking the shifter with your finger, I'm sure that will help remedy things lol. Anyone with a lick of common sense will be taking great care when opening & closing the canopy (and it won't be happening with any great frequency), and this is going to be static in peoples' displays, so there won't be any rattling of gear shifters. I get trying to be thorough, but please.

Honestly, due to it's location the flat spot near the center of the turbine housing (top center on the hood of a normal car) would probably bother me more than anything else he pointed out (assuming it would be visible with my room lighting). I wonder if he reached out to @JazzInc about that?

p.s. - He should really look up the definition of congruent before thinking about using it so frequently again.

Click to expand...

Nick D said:

I’m more than satisfied with my full refund, still, doesn’t make me pleased with their QC and possible future purchases from them if I were to. I’m not hired by HT to talk in an unfavorable way, I just don’t like bad QC.

Click to expand...

Bleah said:

Or you could do both? Bring the issues to light for others to be aware of and also reach out for a resolution. And if a satisfactory resolution was provided or not, give that information as well? Just like how most do it here?

Saying not to bring up issues publicly and instead doing it discreetly (behind the scenes even just for the company's sake) or just blasting out the issues without seeking resolution make both actions seem disingenuous. Shill or thrill behavior was it?

This is just my opinion, Mr. Mom's current actions seem to be trying to get back at Jazzinc for all the flak thrown at him when he reviewed the sample. Not a good look to be honest especially how the newest videos seem were out of spite. However, I would also say to his credit, if those issues with the sample weren't brought up, would the option be even offered to back out with a full refund or would the buyer be stuck with eating the NRD or worse, just being caught off guard with said issues when the Batmobile is received with not much options left on the table if unsatisfied? I know Jazzinc will provide and ship replacement for defective parts as I have received them before but I can't say for the whole car unless there is significant damage to it.

Click to expand...

HanFiredFirst said:

You didn’t get a car, you didn’t have any issues with it, you got a full refund on a preorder, but you’re still not happy and still questioning QC on a model you didn’t even receive. Got it

Click to expand...

joker's_wild said:

So if Hot Toys puts out crap, example the delorean, it's ok to rant about. Jazzinc puts out a product with defects, don't post, reach out behind the scene so it doesn't hurt the company's reputation. Got it, now I know

Click to expand...

joker's_wild said:

I did receive a car with QC issues, so now what's up?

Click to expand...

Hologram AI said:

This.

Very odd how hard people are working to tell him to just shut up about the issues and only tell Joost about it. Why would you not bring up the QC issues to the community the same way people do for INART and Hot Toys? What makes this so special?

He should be doing both though. Bring to light the issues you got with BOTH cars but also reach out to Joost to see if you can get it resolved. Then also mention to the community that he took care of it properly, if he does as he seems very open to doing so. If he doesn't, that's something that should be mentioned to the community as well. There's a middle ground here and yet many seem to be leaning hard in one direction.

Click to expand...