- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 28,502
- Reaction score
- 5,116
Only just catching up on this news story as I have been away on holiday for two weeks.
Absolutely tragic.
Absolutely tragic.
European cops.
Hey leave us alone.
Just because we shout STOP, and we have a stick and a can of deodorant to spray in your face, doesnt mean we arent capable in our Vauxhall Astra 1.9 diesels!
Not sure if anyone still reads this thread for actual info about the shootings or just for the politics, but excellent special section in today's Denver Post about the heroes of the incident, both alive and dead.
https://www.denverpost.com/heroes
My point was that he was using the stand your ground law as a defense... and yes I do know the damn law... and I was not trying to inflame people or push politics... I just wanted to share and see what you guys had to say.
I'm done... I didn't say anything that deserved any of the comments about me or the jumping to conclusions about what I meant by it. I said I was finished with this thread, but I just wanted to clarify my position for Devil so he understood why I posted the link.
But you guys can have the thread... enjoy bullying people with other opinions and making poo jokes.. it's all yours.
But cases like this show that the law is severely flawed and needs to be amended
... enjoy bullying people with other opinions and making poo jokes.. it's all yours.
THANK YOU.
I gotta ask. Is your go to response for whenever anyone disagrees with you or calls you post into question to say your going to leave the thread? How many times have you said that in this thread alone?
If you have a point you want to make then feel free to make it and deal with the people who are going to disagree with you. Everyone else in this thread has managed to do that just fine.
As for your point about knowing the "damn" law, how does a crazy guy misusing the law as defense for a cold blooded killing in any way make the law flawed?
Your words:
by the same premise, can I run you over with my car if I claim I was following the speed limit and had my seat belt on? If I claimed I followed all auto laws in my killing of you with my car, would you in turn call for the severely flawed auto laws to be amended, or would you say that I'm a ******* for thinking it was ok to run you over?
It would be like having to stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk. If a pedestrian decides to cross the street but not at a crosswalk it doesn't give the driver the go ahead to run the person over.I gotta ask. Is your go to response for whenever anyone disagrees with you or calls you post into question to say your going to leave the thread? How many times have you said that in this thread alone?
If you have a point you want to make then feel free to make it and deal with the people who are going to disagree with you. Everyone else in this thread has managed to do that just fine.
As for your point about knowing the "damn" law, how does a crazy guy misusing the law as defense for a cold blooded killing in any way make the law flawed?
Your words:
by the same premise, can I run you over with my car if I claim I was following the speed limit and had my seat belt on? If I claimed I followed all auto laws in my killing of you with my car, would you in turn call for the severely flawed auto laws to be amended, or would you say that I'm a ******* for thinking it was ok to run you over?
No... I just don't have the ability to come on here and express what I think when I am going against 5 or 6 people at the same time without losing my temper. It's a losing situation, so I don't want to stay in the thread if I am going to go off and end up with an infraction.
I'm done talking about this. That's all.
And Devil... I wasn't talking about you specifically...
whats the over/under on how long it takes DA to come back?
About how long it would take you to make a snide comment on it.
I'm not playing your game.
No matter what I say, no matter what I back it up with... It won't change anything. You guys won't back down off of your opinions, nor will I change mine. So why the _____* should I come on here and act as target of the week.
(btw... The law being flawed thing is my opinion... and I just think it must be clarified so that people stop trying to use it as a reason to murder others.)
Thanks for posting that, Prog!
then go. But you know your going to pop up again 5-10 pages later and make a comment, and then storm off when someone disagrees with you.
As for your opinion about the law, do you really think there are scores of people out there who are shooting up their neighborhoods in the name of stand your ground? So far I have heard of exactly two cases where the shooters claim of "stand your ground" was challenged. The first was the Travon Martin case, which was highly sensationalized through biased media, and the one you posted. In the first instance, it seems as if the actual evidence of the case supports the claim of stand your ground. In the one you posted, I don't think there is a sane person in the US that would see it as being even remotely possible of being a justified shooting.
so the next time you decide to pop in and grace us with your opinions I would love to know how the Stand Your Ground law is flawed and exactly how to fix it.
Glad you read it!
Whatever man.. I'm not going to try to debate you. And you won't see me in this thread in 5 or 10 pages... I honestly don't give a crap what you or anyone else thinks. Have fun debating amongst each other.