BeefEaster
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2013
- Messages
- 1,267
- Reaction score
- 637
I liked the first movie but not enough to want to watch an extended version.
I even watched the version that was just the actors in their mo-cap suits running around on the bare sets with no CGI, lol (and yes that's a genuine thing in the box set special features.)I liked the first movie but not enough to want to watch an extended version.
According to Grace, the film needs to make a billion to break even.I can't imagine the claim that AWOW needs to clear 2 billion globally to break even is accurate. How could it be?
In my mind the threshold that it needs to exceed to have respectable earnings is Aquaman's box office (1.148 billion.) If it ends up making less than AM did four years ago then that will indeed be embarrassing, lol.
According to Grace, the film needs to make a billion to break even.
Okay so I just watched the Collector's Extended Edition and all it really has beyond the additional Special Edition scenes is the opening with Jake on Earth and then the extra backstory that Neytiri had a sister who was killed by marines in Grace's school. Other than possibly explaining why Neytiri's first instinct when she sees Jake for the first time is to murder him I don't know that the sister thing really adds anything to the story. She already loses her father on screen which is much more impactful than dialogue stating that she also lost a sister. So while the extra scenes are fun to watch I'd lean toward the Special Edition as the superior extended cut.I was not aware that there were two extended cuts only knew of one so which is the preferred?
Already at $555 million, more than halfway there.According to Grace, the film needs to make a billion to break even.
Did you just say… pt level bad in the year 2022? How dare youIt's so rare for a great filmmaker to stay great as they age. James Cameron is 68, the same age that George was when he turned SW over to Disney back in 2012. Can you imagine George releasing a SW film that he directed as good as AWOW on his own at that age? Hell George was 58 when AOTC came out. Peter Jackson was 51 when the first Hobbit film was released. Now I've always enjoyed the Hobbit flicks but I know that to many they are PT level bad.
It just makes me all that much more amazed at AWOW's quality considering Cameron's age and that even with 13 year gaps between films he still hasn't lost a step and to the contrary is still putting out work that blows away most other directors in their primes.
I read that same review from the Russo bros.Well, now I don't know what to think. Someone I know said they walked out of A2 halfway through and hated it.
Definitely a wise move for him to not watch the third act of a Jim Cameron flick, lol.Well, now I don't know what to think. Someone I know said they walked out of A2 halfway through and hated it.
Holy crap, lol.I read that same review from the Russo bros.
Definitely a wise move for him to NOT watch the third act of a Jim Cameron flick, lol.
It's okay though I can definitely see this movie not being everyone's cup of tea. As I think about I could totally see you feeling the same way as your buddy. It does indeed have a pretty high "Disney movie" vibe throughout a good portion of it (my Moana joke was actually pretty on the nose) but not modern Disney, more old school Disney with high stakes and some good fun "axe to the face" moments and dismembered arms flying through the air, lol.
Like seriously who does that….Definitely a wise move for him to not watch the third act of a Jim Cameron flick, lol.
Superman 4 for me.I've never walked out of a movie in my life -- though I wanted to from Cool World, closest I ever got.
And I agree, after getting halfway through I would assume the best stuff is just around the corner.
Enter your email address to join: