Media Batman: Arkham Knight
- Thread starter Johnny Utah
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 32,452
- Reaction score
- 3,162
Yeah, maybe more of a cat face. 
I think it's the exposed nose, nostrils and upper lip that kill it for me. It's like there's an 80 year old Bruce Willis under that mask there or something. Maybe it would help if they closed the mouth hole up a bit. It's the same deal with Sideshow and their fugly Batman heads.
I think it's the exposed nose, nostrils and upper lip that kill it for me. It's like there's an 80 year old Bruce Willis under that mask there or something. Maybe it would help if they closed the mouth hole up a bit. It's the same deal with Sideshow and their fugly Batman heads.
More like grumpy cat face.
___
Now Riddler is the real rat face!
David Tennant is the Riddler?
FSLAR
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2013
- Messages
- 6,324
- Reaction score
- 47
No, what I said was in good fun, you are getting dull! Dull like that cardboard you call a CQC knife.
Riddler is kind of like a rat at times so it makes sense!More like grumpy cat face.
___
Now Riddler is the real rat face!
Legion19
Super Freak
jye4ever
Broke and happy
Poor Sefton trying not to zone out on her cleavage and thighs.
GasparZizou
Super Freak
I like that they showed the Joker being cremated, guess the DEAD DEAD DEAD wasn't enough
People still trying to fit Joker into the story was getting old.
I hope now the fans do believe AK is not Todd and is instead a new character like RS said.
People still trying to fit Joker into the story was getting old.
I hope now the fans do believe AK is not Todd and is instead a new character like RS said.
GasparZizou
Super Freak
According to some spoilery rumors, he is a new character, but he is related to Batman's existing lore, so it's not completely out of the blue.
Let's just say, if the rumors are true, his name makes a lot more sense.
Let's just say, if the rumors are true, his name makes a lot more sense.
So maybe tying back into the original game with Amadeus Arkham? That would make those journal entries more significant if they built up to a descendant becoming the Arkham Knight.
batfan08
Super Freak
Everything seems to be pointing to Jason, but I still think that it's an adult version of Damian. For one thing, he has the motive: he blames Batman for the death of his mother and grandfather. For another, he has the means. With the Jason theories, I'm left wondering how he managed to acquire the massive force that the Arkham Knight has brought together, whereas, with Damian, he would be the sole heir to the throne of the League of Assassins. Plus, I feel like they could get away with the "all-new character" thing, as well, because, one, we've never seen the Arkham Knight before, and, two, we've never seen an adult Damian before, in the context of being face to face with his father (I realize that he was Batman in #666 and so on, but that was after Bruce's death. It just makes too much sense, which is precisely why I'm probably wrong.
batfan08
Super Freak
I can accept the whole "the Batmobile tases them out of the way" thing as video game logic, but how the **** are they supposed to survive Batman driving over them while they're knocked out?
GasparZizou
Super Freak
You're onto something....
There's really nothing that points out to that, those are just theories based entirely on assumptions.Everything seems to be pointing to Jason, but I still think that it's an adult version of Damian. For one thing, he has the motive: he blames Batman for the death of his mother and grandfather. For another, he has the means. With the Jason theories, I'm left wondering how he managed to acquire the massive force that the Arkham Knight has brought together, whereas, with Damian, he would be the sole heir to the throne of the League of Assassins. Plus, I feel like they could get away with the "all-new character" thing, as well, because, one, we've never seen the Arkham Knight before, and, two, we've never seen an adult Damian before, in the context of being face to face with his father (I realize that he was Batman in #666 and so on, but that was after Bruce's death. It just makes too much sense, which is precisely why I'm probably wrong.
RS doesn't lie, as we've seen with the Joker, if they say it's a new character, I believe them. They're not Kojima.
batfan08
Super Freak
You're onto something....
There's really nothing that points out to that, those are just theories based entirely on assumptions.
RS doesn't lie, as we've seen with the Joker, if they say it's a new character, I believe them. They're not Kojima.
I said I'm probably wrong, so shut up.
GasparZizou
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 32,452
- Reaction score
- 3,162
I like that they showed the Joker being cremated, guess the DEAD DEAD DEAD wasn't enough
You just ****ing wait.
Joker has been in every Arkham game, this will be no different. Scarecrow and Arkham Knight are a red herring just like Hugo Strange, Clayface and Black Mask were in City and Origins.
GasparZizou
Super Freak
Do you really think RS would pull such a dumb, predictable, cheap, stale and tired move? I don't know, I kinda hold them in a higher esteem than that.
Similar threads
