Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (March 24th, 2016)

[crows]

Mate, if you legitimately think you can see a camel-toe anywhere on that picture, I think probably you've never seen a ****** before. Either that or you're just puerile for the sake of it.

Edit: This forum SERIOUSLY censors the actual words for reproductive anatomy? What a joke.

Anyway, here's that picture without text:

all I see are two moose knuckles

 

[The Clown Prince of Crime]

Well, she said in an interview that there was no new technology to the suit, so it stayed the same. I would of preferred a more rustic, home made suit once he gets back to Gotham, since he lost the TDK suit after he was captured. Something like this from Zero Year, which is a similar story, except it's the Riddler who takes over Gotham.

As far as Batffleck, I'm sure they'll give him a new costume in the next film whether he needs one or not. Snyder gave Superman a new suit. The blue and grey suit with the yellow emblem would be a great design, especially in a Justice League film.

 

[GasparZizou]

I agree, except for the yellow emblem. My favorite will always be black emblem on gray batsuit. We already had plenty yellow emblem, yellow emblem doesn't fit with JL imo, I always thought it looked odd in JLA earth 2.

 

[clockwork463]

Insane Batman vs Superman and Batfleck theory | moviepilot.com

This has probably been posted, but thoughts on this anyone?

 

[GasparZizou]

Thanks for sharing, love crazy theories.

It's a cool read but I hope it's not true.

There's a theory right now that it's not really Bizarro or Doomsday but Omac the big muscle Batman and Superman will be fighting together, it doesn't really disprove that theory but it does detract from it a little.

 

[clockwork463]

Thanks for sharing, love crazy theories.

It's a cool read but I hope it's not true.

If bale actually showed up, that would be amazing.

 

[Sachiel]

Insane Batman vs Superman and Batfleck theory | moviepilot.com

This has probably been posted, but thoughts on this anyone?

Hilarious.

 

[DiFabio]

What a whacked theory.

 

[GasparZizou]

It is reaching hard.

Plus, that part about the toys, they're custom toys made by fans and the dude thinks they're too perfect to be home-made

Edit: Just read the long version, that dude doesn't seem to know a lot about comics.

Dropped.

 

[crows]

I never understood why they had so much trouble with the neck with the Burton movie (and the 3 movies after) ... You would think that a multi million production from such a big company like that would have found a way for Batman to turn his neck....

I understand they used rubber for the cowl, and their solution to that problem was to just not have batman turn around....but that seems like such a backwards solution to that problem lol

I never understood why they didn't just made the rubber thinner or something.

 

[jye4ever]

I think his theory is 100% on the money.

 

[GasparZizou]

I think it's a cool theory in general and at the beginning it makes a bit of sense, but once you start reading further into his "proof" it becomes increasingly more unbelievable.

 

[GasparZizou]

I never understood why they had so much trouble with the neck with the Burton movie (and the 3 movies after) ... You would think that a multi million production from such a big company like that would have found a way for Batman to turn his neck....

I understand they used rubber for the cowl, and their solution to that problem was to just not have batman turn around....but that seems like such a backwards solution to that problem lol

I never understood why they didn't just made the rubber thinner or something.

Because the rubber cracked easily, I remember seeing a documentary that as soon as the rubber showed some cracks or it was scratched, they had to dump that suit and get a new one, which was very expensive.

So I'm guessing they kept the rubber thick and made him turn his entire body to save batsuits.

 

[crows]

Because the rubber cracked easily, I remember seeing a documentary that as soon as the rubber showed some cracks or it was scratched, they had to dump that suit and get a new one, which was very expensive.

So I'm guessing they kept the rubber thick and made him turn his entire body to save batsuits.

did they say why it needed to be rubber?

 

[The Clown Prince of Crime]

Well, that explains the $450 million budget of BvS.

 

[GasparZizou]

did they say why it needed to be rubber?

Because they needed the sculpted muscles, and the best way to get that look is with rubber foam, that's why since Keaton it became the go to technique for the muscle suit, and it has improved ever since, but they largely pioneered with Keaton.

 

[jpuli28]

Insane Batman vs Superman and Batfleck theory | moviepilot.com

This has probably been posted, but thoughts on this anyone?

Affleck is Deathstroke, DS is Batman, Robin is Joker etc... Oh brother.

 

[jpuli28]

I think it's a cool theory in general and at the beginning it makes a bit of sense, but once you start reading further into his "proof" it becomes increasingly more unbelievable.

^ This.

 

[DiFabio]

I never understood why they had so much trouble with the neck with the Burton movie (and the 3 movies after) ... You would think that a multi million production from such a big company like that would have found a way for Batman to turn his neck....

I understand they used rubber for the cowl, and their solution to that problem was to just not have batman turn around....but that seems like such a backwards solution to that problem lol

I never understood why they didn't just made the rubber thinner or something.

Keaton, Kilmer, Clooney and Bale could move their head in the cowl.

It's just when they did, the face/mouth hole would move with it and look all warped and crappy. They also wanted to maintain the silhouette which is why they were one piece.






1:00-1:30

 

[GasparZizou]

^ This.

Yeah, I mean, all that has been done successfully in comics or animation, so it shouldn't come out of left field, and I actually think there's ground for this and the Robin theory, but it seems that dude wants to make people not believe.

Legit flat-earther rationale right there.